Command Responsibility and Bush Failures

Then please explain why I wasn't drawn to pot smoking, cheating on my wife
with
a fat woman or lying under oath during the Clinton administration.


So you have been since?

Walt

"WalterM140" wrote in message
...
Ditto on weapons of mass destruction supposedly held by Saddam.

When the head of the CIA says its a "slam dunk" case, who should argue with
him?

Please point us to some documentation that head of the CIA says its
a "slam dunk" case.

That's what Woodward's book "Plan of Attack" says.

That's not all. Here are a few more links that prove the point:

http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/...woodward.book/
http://www.antiwar.com/orig/prather.php?articleid=2383
http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=38198
http://www.wnd.com/news/printer-frie...TICLE_ID=38198
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1124110/posts

There's a lot more but that ought to prove that an awful lot of people heard and
reported the statement. If anyone needs an audio tape of the statement, they
can probably find one somewhere in Google if it's worth the effort.

George Z.

WASHINGTON (AFP) - A leading military newspaper said that US Defense
Secretary Donald Rumsfeld set the tone for the prisoner abuse scandal
in Iraq by refusing to give captives rights due prisoners of war under
the Geneva Conventions.

"This was a failure that ran straight to the top," said the editorial
appearing in the May 17 edition of the Military Times weeklies.

"Accountability here is essential -- even if that means relieving top
leaders from duty in a time of war," it said.

Owned by Gannett, the Military Times publishes the Army, Navy and Air
Force times, weeklies that are widely read by servicemembers and
distributed on US military bases around the world.

The editorial said the soldiers caught in photographs and videos
abusing prisoners at the Abu Ghraib prison are referred to around the
Pentagon as "the six morons who lost the war."

"But the folks in the Pentagon are talking about the wrong morons," it
said.

Responsibility, it said, "extends all the way up the chain of command
to the highest reaches of the military hierarchy and its civilian
leadership."

"The entire affair is a failure of leadership from start to finish,"
it said.

"Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld set the tone early in this war by
steadfastly refusing to give captives the rights accorded to prisoners
of war under the Geneva Convention," it said.

"From the moment they are captured, prisoners are hooded, shackled and
accorded no rights whatsoever. The message to the troops: Anything
goes."

The editorial also faults General Richard Myers, the chairman of the
Joint Chiefs of Staff, for trying to persuade CBS television to
refrain from airing the images while failing to read the army's own
damning internal report detailing the abuses.

"On the battlefield, Myers' and Rumsfelds' errors would be called a
lack of situational awareness -- a failure that amounts to
professional negligence," it said.

"George Z. Bush" wrote in message ...
"WalterM140" wrote in message
...
Ditto on weapons of mass destruction supposedly held by Saddam.

When the head of the CIA says its a "slam dunk" case, who should argue with
him?

Please point us to some documentation that head of the CIA says its
a "slam dunk" case.

That's what Woodward's book "Plan of Attack" says.

That's not all. Here are a few more links that prove the point:

http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/...woodward.book/
http://www.antiwar.com/orig/prather.php?articleid=2383
http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=38198
http://www.wnd.com/news/printer-frie...TICLE_ID=38198
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1124110/posts


Those all refer back to Woodward's book "Plan of Attack". In fact
most of those are copies of the same article published on multiple
web pages.


There's a lot more but that ought to prove that an awful lot of people heard and
reported the statement.

There is NOTHING in there to indicate that anyone other than Bush
and Tenet allegedly heard or reported the statement. McLaughlin
hould have heard it, has he said he did? Woodwards says he interviewed
75 people, he does not say that 75 people confirmed the statement.
Tenet has covered for Bush befor.

Tenet has covered for Bush befor.

No one has ever shown any hard evidence that the US intelligence
abotu WMDs in Iraq was substantively in error. It has only been
shown that the public statements were contrary to fact.

If anyone needs an audio tape of the statement, they
can probably find one somewhere in Google if it's worth the effort.

But could you authenticate it?

--

FF