|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
June 9th 14, 08:33 AM
posted to rec.aviation.soaring
|
|||
|
|||
Electronic vs. Pneumatic TE
W dniu poniedziałek, 9 czerwca 2014 07:49:33 UTC+2 użytkownik SoaringXCellence napisał:
Just got a LX V7 and was wondering about opinions regarding the TE function. I have a pneumatic TE in the glider, but was just wondering if the electronic might be better. The whole TE concept is really a mathematical process and if the unit has a good Pitot and Static source it should be able to get the TE without a probe, just by calculation. I've had false reading with some pneumatic system due to yaw (poor coordination, I know), which the electronic system may be able to avoid. What's your opinion? many years ago i made such analog device for hang-glider based on speed (propeller fan) and hang-glider loads (transfer kinetic and geopotential energy) and compensation worked well sensitiveness was about 10 cm/s 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Electronic versus Pneumatic compensation (conclusions) | [email protected] | Soaring | 0 | September 26th 05 06:02 PM |
| Electronic versus Pneumatic compensation (follow-up) | [email protected] | Soaring | 4 | September 20th 05 07:21 PM |
| Electronic versus Pneumatic compensation (follow-up) | [email protected] | Soaring | 2 | September 20th 05 07:04 AM |
| Electronic versus Pneumatic compensation in LX7000 | [email protected] | Soaring | 8 | September 15th 05 03:49 AM |
| Pneumatic switching? | bumper | Soaring | 5 | March 15th 05 03:58 AM |
Hybrid Mode
