A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Any fliers?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old May 17th 04, 01:01 AM
Ron
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Was flying a C-54E up until the forest service tanker massacre last week.

Hopefully it will be fixed and I will have a airtanker pilot career of more
than 3 weeks duration.


Ron
Tanker 65, C-54E (DC-4)
Silver City Tanker Base

  #2  
Old May 17th 04, 02:25 AM
Krztalizer
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Was flying a C-54E up until the forest service tanker massacre last week.

Hopefully it will be fixed and I will have a airtanker pilot career of more
than 3 weeks duration.


Ron, I was thinking about you when I heard the decision to ax all the old
firebombers in the fleet. Any word yet on how soon they will replace them, or
how they will provide qualified pilots for the "new" firebombers? That 747
firebomber is freakin' amazing.

Good luck in the future.
v/r
Gordon
  #3  
Old May 17th 04, 02:31 AM
Dave Kearton
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Krztalizer" wrote in message
...
|
| Was flying a C-54E up until the forest service tanker massacre last week.
|
| Hopefully it will be fixed and I will have a airtanker pilot career of
more
| than 3 weeks duration.
|
|
| Ron, I was thinking about you when I heard the decision to ax all the old
| firebombers in the fleet. Any word yet on how soon they will replace
them, or
| how they will provide qualified pilots for the "new" firebombers? That
747
| firebomber is freakin' amazing.
|
| Good luck in the future.
| v/r
| Gordon



Is the 747 firebomber a serious proposition ???????


I first thought it was a Photoshop fantasy - then a proof of concept - but
is it actually something that sober people are actually doing the numbers on
?



Cheers


Dave Kearton




  #4  
Old May 17th 04, 02:50 AM
Ron
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Is the 747 firebomber a serious proposition ???????


I first thought it was a Photoshop fantasy - then a proof of concept - but
is it actually something that sober people are actually doing the numbers on
?



Cheers


Dave Kearton


They have an aircraft tanked up, and have done lots of drops. I think there
are some situations that it can be good in, but I can think of a whole lot of
others too it might not be that great.

However, a lot of the concerns expressed about it being too big, were also said
when the B-17 was being introduced into forest fire work.


Ron
Tanker 65, C-54E (DC-4)
Silver City Tanker Base

  #5  
Old May 17th 04, 05:22 AM
Krztalizer
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Is the 747 firebomber a serious proposition ???????



Dave, would I ever lie to you?

no comments, all the rest of you bums out there.

G
  #6  
Old May 17th 04, 02:49 AM
Ron
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Ron, I was thinking about you when I heard the decision to ax all the old
firebombers in the fleet. Any word yet on how soon they will replace them,
or
how they will provide qualified pilots for the "new" firebombers? That 747
firebomber is freakin' amazing.

Good luck in the future.
v/r
Gordon


The contracts were cancelled after the NTSB published a report saying that
there was not a system in place to assure airworthyness, and the Forest Circus
took that to mean they are the ones liable if anything goes wrong.

The western governors are up in arms, and congress might work on some kind of
emergency measure to bring the FAA into it somehow for some kind of inspection
program that they sign off on. The planes have been inspected heavily over the
past 2 years, and are probably safer than anytime since they came out of the
factory.

The planes are not grounded, we flew them back to the home base, they could
still be hired by states if they want. but I am optimistic something will be
soon soon to bring them back in operation.

As for that 747 system, thats an evergreen project, with some rumors of
homeland security funding. They are tanking up some additional planes now too
apparently, so I kinda suspect something fishy might be going on there.

I was out your way 2 weeks ago out of San Bernardino. Flew on a fire on camp
pendleton, temecula, riverside, and others during that busy week there.

The fleet has to be replaced soon, and hopefully forest service and congress
will help, because at the low ball rates the FS pays, they only maintain the
planes they have.

50 hours in the C-54 and hoping for more!



Ron
Tanker 65, C-54E (DC-4)
Silver City Tanker Base

  #7  
Old May 17th 04, 03:05 AM
George Z. Bush
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Ron" wrote in message
...

Ron, I was thinking about you when I heard the decision to ax all the old
firebombers in the fleet. Any word yet on how soon they will replace them,
or
how they will provide qualified pilots for the "new" firebombers? That 747
firebomber is freakin' amazing.

Good luck in the future.
v/r
Gordon


The contracts were cancelled after the NTSB published a report saying that
there was not a system in place to assure airworthyness, and the Forest Circus
took that to mean they are the ones liable if anything goes wrong.

The western governors are up in arms, and congress might work on some kind of
emergency measure to bring the FAA into it somehow for some kind of inspection
program that they sign off on. The planes have been inspected heavily over

the
past 2 years, and are probably safer than anytime since they came out of the
factory.

The planes are not grounded, we flew them back to the home base, they could
still be hired by states if they want. but I am optimistic something will be
soon soon to bring them back in operation.

As for that 747 system, thats an evergreen project, with some rumors of
homeland security funding. They are tanking up some additional planes now too
apparently, so I kinda suspect something fishy might be going on there.

I was out your way 2 weeks ago out of San Bernardino. Flew on a fire on camp
pendleton, temecula, riverside, and others during that busy week there.

The fleet has to be replaced soon, and hopefully forest service and congress
will help, because at the low ball rates the FS pays, they only maintain the
planes they have.

50 hours in the C-54 and hoping for more!


I hope you enjoyed them.....I know I did in the Rescue versions we flew, and I
hope you have many more. She's almost as good and forgiving a bird as the
gooney, an earlier Douglas contribution to aviation history.

George Z.


  #8  
Old May 17th 04, 05:19 AM
Krztalizer
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


I was out your way 2 weeks ago out of San Bernardino. Flew on a fire on camp
pendleton, temecula, riverside, and others during that busy week there.


That area is such a tinderbox, I believe it will be keeping firefighters in
business forever. :\

Thanks for helping - sure not looking forward to late summer here. I'm betting
you'll be invited back.

v/r
Gordon
  #9  
Old May 18th 04, 05:37 PM
Brian Colwell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Krztalizer" wrote in message
...

Was flying a C-54E up until the forest service tanker massacre last week.

Hopefully it will be fixed and I will have a airtanker pilot career of

more
than 3 weeks duration.


Ron, I was thinking about you when I heard the decision to ax all the old
firebombers in the fleet. Any word yet on how soon they will replace

them, or
how they will provide qualified pilots for the "new" firebombers? That

747
firebomber is freakin' amazing.

Good luck in the future.
v/r
Gordon


Up here in BC, we are still using a couple of Mars flying boats !!!! for
fire fighting, they still look pretty impressive. They often send them South
of the 49th to help out .

BMC


  #10  
Old May 18th 04, 04:30 PM
Tom Swift
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Garamondextended" wrote in message
Any fliers on this NG? Any at all?


Started in a Thomas-Morse-Boeing MB-3 Scout, then
Curtiss JN-4
Curtiss Tanager
Piper Cub
Aeronca
Waco
Howard
N3N
SNJ
Lysander
AT-7, 9,10,11
B-24
B-25
A-26
B-17
B-47
C-45
Beech 18
C-46
C-47
C-54
C-97
T-29
Sabreliner
KingAir
Staggerwing Beech


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
For Fliers Only ArtKramr Military Aviation 37 December 4th 03 09:33 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:33 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.