![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Was flying a C-54E up until the forest service tanker massacre last week.
Hopefully it will be fixed and I will have a airtanker pilot career of more than 3 weeks duration. Ron Tanker 65, C-54E (DC-4) Silver City Tanker Base |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Was flying a C-54E up until the forest service tanker massacre last week. Hopefully it will be fixed and I will have a airtanker pilot career of more than 3 weeks duration. Ron, I was thinking about you when I heard the decision to ax all the old firebombers in the fleet. Any word yet on how soon they will replace them, or how they will provide qualified pilots for the "new" firebombers? That 747 firebomber is freakin' amazing. Good luck in the future. v/r Gordon |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Krztalizer" wrote in message ... | | Was flying a C-54E up until the forest service tanker massacre last week. | | Hopefully it will be fixed and I will have a airtanker pilot career of more | than 3 weeks duration. | | | Ron, I was thinking about you when I heard the decision to ax all the old | firebombers in the fleet. Any word yet on how soon they will replace them, or | how they will provide qualified pilots for the "new" firebombers? That 747 | firebomber is freakin' amazing. | | Good luck in the future. | v/r | Gordon Is the 747 firebomber a serious proposition ??????? I first thought it was a Photoshop fantasy - then a proof of concept - but is it actually something that sober people are actually doing the numbers on ? Cheers Dave Kearton |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Is the 747 firebomber a serious proposition ???????
I first thought it was a Photoshop fantasy - then a proof of concept - but is it actually something that sober people are actually doing the numbers on ? Cheers Dave Kearton They have an aircraft tanked up, and have done lots of drops. I think there are some situations that it can be good in, but I can think of a whole lot of others too it might not be that great. However, a lot of the concerns expressed about it being too big, were also said when the B-17 was being introduced into forest fire work. Ron Tanker 65, C-54E (DC-4) Silver City Tanker Base |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Is the 747 firebomber a serious proposition ??????? Dave, would I ever lie to you? ![]() no comments, all the rest of you bums out there. G |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Ron, I was thinking about you when I heard the decision to ax all the old firebombers in the fleet. Any word yet on how soon they will replace them, or how they will provide qualified pilots for the "new" firebombers? That 747 firebomber is freakin' amazing. Good luck in the future. v/r Gordon The contracts were cancelled after the NTSB published a report saying that there was not a system in place to assure airworthyness, and the Forest Circus took that to mean they are the ones liable if anything goes wrong. The western governors are up in arms, and congress might work on some kind of emergency measure to bring the FAA into it somehow for some kind of inspection program that they sign off on. The planes have been inspected heavily over the past 2 years, and are probably safer than anytime since they came out of the factory. The planes are not grounded, we flew them back to the home base, they could still be hired by states if they want. but I am optimistic something will be soon soon to bring them back in operation. As for that 747 system, thats an evergreen project, with some rumors of homeland security funding. They are tanking up some additional planes now too apparently, so I kinda suspect something fishy might be going on there. I was out your way 2 weeks ago out of San Bernardino. Flew on a fire on camp pendleton, temecula, riverside, and others during that busy week there. The fleet has to be replaced soon, and hopefully forest service and congress will help, because at the low ball rates the FS pays, they only maintain the planes they have. 50 hours in the C-54 and hoping for more! Ron Tanker 65, C-54E (DC-4) Silver City Tanker Base |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ron" wrote in message ... Ron, I was thinking about you when I heard the decision to ax all the old firebombers in the fleet. Any word yet on how soon they will replace them, or how they will provide qualified pilots for the "new" firebombers? That 747 firebomber is freakin' amazing. Good luck in the future. v/r Gordon The contracts were cancelled after the NTSB published a report saying that there was not a system in place to assure airworthyness, and the Forest Circus took that to mean they are the ones liable if anything goes wrong. The western governors are up in arms, and congress might work on some kind of emergency measure to bring the FAA into it somehow for some kind of inspection program that they sign off on. The planes have been inspected heavily over the past 2 years, and are probably safer than anytime since they came out of the factory. The planes are not grounded, we flew them back to the home base, they could still be hired by states if they want. but I am optimistic something will be soon soon to bring them back in operation. As for that 747 system, thats an evergreen project, with some rumors of homeland security funding. They are tanking up some additional planes now too apparently, so I kinda suspect something fishy might be going on there. I was out your way 2 weeks ago out of San Bernardino. Flew on a fire on camp pendleton, temecula, riverside, and others during that busy week there. The fleet has to be replaced soon, and hopefully forest service and congress will help, because at the low ball rates the FS pays, they only maintain the planes they have. 50 hours in the C-54 and hoping for more! I hope you enjoyed them.....I know I did in the Rescue versions we flew, and I hope you have many more. She's almost as good and forgiving a bird as the gooney, an earlier Douglas contribution to aviation history. George Z. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I was out your way 2 weeks ago out of San Bernardino. Flew on a fire on camp pendleton, temecula, riverside, and others during that busy week there. That area is such a tinderbox, I believe it will be keeping firefighters in business forever. :\ Thanks for helping - sure not looking forward to late summer here. I'm betting you'll be invited back. v/r Gordon |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Krztalizer" wrote in message ... Was flying a C-54E up until the forest service tanker massacre last week. Hopefully it will be fixed and I will have a airtanker pilot career of more than 3 weeks duration. Ron, I was thinking about you when I heard the decision to ax all the old firebombers in the fleet. Any word yet on how soon they will replace them, or how they will provide qualified pilots for the "new" firebombers? That 747 firebomber is freakin' amazing. Good luck in the future. v/r Gordon Up here in BC, we are still using a couple of Mars flying boats !!!! for fire fighting, they still look pretty impressive. They often send them South of the 49th to help out . BMC |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Garamondextended" wrote in message Any fliers on this NG? Any at all? Started in a Thomas-Morse-Boeing MB-3 Scout, then Curtiss JN-4 Curtiss Tanager Piper Cub Aeronca Waco Howard N3N SNJ Lysander AT-7, 9,10,11 B-24 B-25 A-26 B-17 B-47 C-45 Beech 18 C-46 C-47 C-54 C-97 T-29 Sabreliner KingAir Staggerwing Beech |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
For Fliers Only | ArtKramr | Military Aviation | 37 | December 4th 03 09:33 PM |