A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Setback for Rutan



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #2  
Old June 24th 04, 03:13 AM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"B2431" wrote in message
...

How did this one not qualify?


The X Prize flights require three people aboard or a pilot and ballast
equivalent to two people. Melvill flew solo and carried no ballast.


  #3  
Old June 23rd 04, 02:47 PM
Jim Yanik
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Peter Kemp wrote in
news
Looks like the flight did not go to plan.

According to BBC reports quoting Rutan there were severe control
problems that forced the pilot (ok, ok, astronaut) to resort to backup
controls just after boost (uncommanded roll) and again near Apogee
(nothing specific mentioned).

He says they're not flying again until they know what the hell
happened, and the next flight will not now be the first for the
X-Prize, but another test flight.

Can't say I blame him, and Starchaser (the next closest IIRC) are 18
months away, so time isn't that critical.

Peter Kemp


What sort of maneuvering controls do they have for when the SS1 is out of
the atmosphere and the aero control surfaces don't work? If any.

--
Jim Yanik
jyanik-at-kua.net
  #4  
Old June 23rd 04, 03:55 PM
Peter Stickney
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
Jim Yanik writes:
Peter Kemp wrote in
news
Looks like the flight did not go to plan.

According to BBC reports quoting Rutan there were severe control
problems that forced the pilot (ok, ok, astronaut) to resort to backup
controls just after boost (uncommanded roll) and again near Apogee
(nothing specific mentioned).

He says they're not flying again until they know what the hell
happened, and the next flight will not now be the first for the
X-Prize, but another test flight.

Can't say I blame him, and Starchaser (the next closest IIRC) are 18
months away, so time isn't that critical.


What sort of maneuvering controls do they have for when the SS1 is out of
the atmosphere and the aero control surfaces don't work? If any.


There's a Reaction Contol System (RCS), for Roll, Pitch adn Yaw. I
don't have any specifics on it - Rutan says that it's a "Cold Gas"
system, which is usually compressed gas, but could potentially be
HTP (High Test Peroxide). The RCS can control attitude, but can't
change the trajectory.


--
Pete Stickney
A strong conviction that something must be done is the parent of many
bad measures. -- Daniel Webster
  #5  
Old June 23rd 04, 02:38 PM
Jeff Crowell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Peter Kemp wrote:
According to BBC reports quoting Rutan there were severe control
problems that forced the pilot (ok, ok, astronaut) to resort to backup
controls just after boost (uncommanded roll) and again near Apogee
(nothing specific mentioned).


From where I sit, let's call him a a pilot... he WAS driving, after all,
not just watching the pretty lights.

Melville and Rutan were on Leno last night, pilot said the problem
was with the trim system near/at apogee, not control system, though
ISTR someone mentioning right after the flight that they had had
some roll instability during the flight, and right after launch it looked
in the video as if the plane (spacecraft?) was rolling back and forth
about 40-50 degrees each way from vertical.


Jeff


  #6  
Old June 23rd 04, 04:15 PM
Alan Minyard
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Wed, 23 Jun 2004 07:38:39 -0600, "Jeff Crowell" wrote:

Peter Kemp wrote:
According to BBC reports quoting Rutan there were severe control
problems that forced the pilot (ok, ok, astronaut) to resort to backup
controls just after boost (uncommanded roll) and again near Apogee
(nothing specific mentioned).


From where I sit, let's call him a a pilot... he WAS driving, after all,
not just watching the pretty lights.

Melville and Rutan were on Leno last night, pilot said the problem
was with the trim system near/at apogee, not control system, though
ISTR someone mentioning right after the flight that they had had
some roll instability during the flight, and right after launch it looked
in the video as if the plane (spacecraft?) was rolling back and forth
about 40-50 degrees each way from vertical.


Jeff

At apogee there would be almost no control authority (lack of sufficient air
molecules). Do they have a thruster system for control at that altitude??

Al Minyard
  #7  
Old June 23rd 04, 05:14 PM
Robert Briggs
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Alan Minyard wrote:

At apogee there would be almost no control authority (lack of sufficient air
molecules). Do they have a thruster system for control at that altitude??


If there is *any* remotely usable control authority then the thing ain't
in space for any reasonable value of "space".
  #8  
Old June 23rd 04, 06:46 PM
Peter Stickney
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
Robert Briggs writes:
Alan Minyard wrote:

At apogee there would be almost no control authority (lack of sufficient air
molecules). Do they have a thruster system for control at that altitude??


If there is *any* remotely usable control authority then the thing ain't
in space for any reasonable value of "space".


A couple or three points:
Control Authority doesn't have to mean aerodunamic controls - SS1
has a cold-gas RCS system for attitude control a very low EAS.

There is no such thing a "a reasonable value of 'space'".
It's not like there's a definite dividing line between Atmosphere
adn Vacuum - the density of the atmosphere thrails off as height
increases, but it doesn't entirely go away. Aerodynamic drag, and
the variations in that that occur was the Earth's atmosphere expands
and contracts due to Solar Radiation, are a significant factor in
the lifetime of an orbiting satellite. (Remember Skylab). That
Orbital Decay that you hear so much of is mostly caused by
atmospheric drag.

(By the same token, I'd like to punch Eugene Sanger, or his
translators, in the nose for starting that whole like of crap about
"skipping" off the Earth's atmosphere with a lifting spacecraft. It
doesn't and can't happen that way. The only way to change your vector
with such a craft while re-entering is to fly up, rather than bounce
up - you've got to be flying fast enough, in thick enough air, to
allow a normal pull-up. (As a reference, note that Columbia had
almost reached an EAS that would have allowed a pull-up, but hadn't
yet))

The definition of where "space" starts is completely arbitrary. The
USAF specifies it as 50 miles MSL. The FAI specifies it as 100 km.

--
Pete Stickney
A strong conviction that something must be done is the parent of many
bad measures. -- Daniel Webster
  #9  
Old June 23rd 04, 06:35 PM
Peter Stickney
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
Alan Minyard writes:
On Wed, 23 Jun 2004 07:38:39 -0600, "Jeff Crowell" wrote:

Peter Kemp wrote:
According to BBC reports quoting Rutan there were severe control
problems that forced the pilot (ok, ok, astronaut) to resort to backup
controls just after boost (uncommanded roll) and again near Apogee
(nothing specific mentioned).


From where I sit, let's call him a a pilot... he WAS driving, after all,
not just watching the pretty lights.

Melville and Rutan were on Leno last night, pilot said the problem
was with the trim system near/at apogee, not control system, though
ISTR someone mentioning right after the flight that they had had
some roll instability during the flight, and right after launch it looked
in the video as if the plane (spacecraft?) was rolling back and forth
about 40-50 degrees each way from vertical.


Jeff

At apogee there would be almost no control authority (lack of sufficient air
molecules). Do they have a thruster system for control at that altitude??


Yes - there's a cold-gas RSC system. See my response to Jim Yanik's
post on this thread.


--
Pete Stickney
A strong conviction that something must be done is the parent of many
bad measures. -- Daniel Webster
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:45 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.