![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
For years the ASA had three classes. A, B and C. A tasks were designed for SSA contests practice and followed those rules. B was around 70% of A tasking and C kept new to contest flying pilots within glide of the home airport while getting them used to contest rules.
When you won or came close to winning B class for the year you were moved up to A the next and those at the bottom. Of A were given the choice to go down to B. C class was hardly used but did come in handy at times. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Thanks. My brainstorm was a thought about the couple low performance regional contests we've done. It's not unusual for a pilot to sometimes ask if we accept low performance pilots not just low performance gliders. Often this kind of a joking question but not always. The real goal in my mind is to try to get a bunch of gliders in the same class that all have semi close achieved speeds. This makes it more fun for the competitors in my opinion.
I was thinking of a formula that would consider glider handicap and pilot ability. Using the ranking list seemed like a natural way to judge pilot ability although that won't always be a sure bet. We have usually used a 1.115 (Standard Austria SH-1) handicap as the cutoff for "Low Performance". I spit balled a formula that would allow anyone with 1.115 handicap or higher to participate and give the option for gliders as good as a Std Cirrus depending on ranking list. Formula i thought up is: SSA Handicap - (Pilot Ranking *1.115/1000) = 1 So anyone up to National Champions can fly the "regular" low performance gliders. Higher performance than that it is a sliding scale until someone with a 0 ranking can compete in a Std. Cirrus. I'd be interested to hear peoples thoughts on this type of formula for defining a Sport Class subset. Of course, if the new guy in the Cirrus wanted to, they could always fly against the ASW-27's and other higher performance gliders in the rest of sports class. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Splitting PowerFLARM | [email protected] | Soaring | 7 | December 13th 12 01:27 PM |
| US Contest Rules Pilot Poll | [email protected] | Soaring | 6 | October 15th 12 08:12 PM |
| 2012 SSA Contest Pilot Ranking list? | Mike[_37_] | Soaring | 10 | January 16th 12 02:37 PM |
| US SSA Contest Pilot Opinion Poll | Ken Sorenson | Soaring | 19 | October 6th 10 08:03 PM |
| Air show features demonstrations of crowd-pleasing skill | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | September 20th 04 11:09 PM |