A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

More on Bush in the Air Guard



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 13th 04, 10:10 PM
ian maclure
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 11:14:54 +0000, WalterM140 wrote:


More on Bush in the Air Guard

http://www.glcq.com/bush_at_arpc1.htm

SUMMARY

An examination of the Bush military files within the context of US Statutory
Law, Department of Defense regulations, and Air Force policies and procedures
of that era lead to a single conclusion: George W. Bush was considered a
deserter by the United States Air Force.


[snip]

Then post the USAF document ( all of it ) that spells this out.
There ought to be one if what you claim is true.
There ought to be a document somewhere that specifically
addresses the particulars of the case in question and states
your conclusion in black and white.
What?
You can't?
I'm shocked I tell you, shocked!

IBM

__________________________________________________ _____________________________
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Accounts Starting At $6.95 - http://www.uncensored-news.com
The Worlds Uncensored News Source

  #2  
Old July 14th 04, 12:55 AM
Fred the Red Shirt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

(WalterM140) wrote in message ...
More on Bush in the Air Guard

http://www.glcq.com/bush_at_arpc1.htm

SUMMARY

... ARPC then designated Bush as AWOL
and a “non-locatee” (i.e. a deserter) who had failed to satisfactorily
participate in TXANG, and certified him for immediate induction through his
local draft board. ...


Only the 'summary' on that site indicates that ARPC did this. No
evidence to support that conclusion is cited.

Crimony, there is no reason to make stuff up to criticize Baby Bush.
just stick to the facts. That's enough.

--

FF
  #3  
Old July 15th 04, 01:34 AM
B2431
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

What part of rec.aviation.military do you not understand?

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Juan Jiminez is a liar and a fraud (was: Zoom fables on ANN ChuckSlusarczyk Home Built 105 October 8th 04 12:38 AM
Bush's guard record JDKAHN Home Built 13 October 3rd 04 09:38 PM
Two MOH Winners say Bush Didn't Serve WalterM140 Military Aviation 196 June 14th 04 11:33 PM
bush rules! Be Kind Military Aviation 53 February 14th 04 04:26 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:19 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.