A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

IMI versus MM Fab Riggers



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old December 5th 17, 06:32 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
JS[_5_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 624
Default IMI versus MM Fab Riggers

I've used the Cobra manual, Cobra electric, Udo Rumpf with and without lateral adjustment, Steve Koerner with and without lateral adjustment, an old style Mark Mocho rigger, and a couple of home made ones.
Will use an IMI electric in a week.
Not a fan of the gas strut versions of any of them. Thought the one Udo made for my 26E was the best.
The training wheels that you spin out of the way can be a problem, but so can the tricycle gear if the glider has a lot of dihedral.
ASW20 will be easy to rig. Anything with spar end spiggots (mostly old but plenty are still made, like New Ventus and JS3) are more difficult.
With any rigger, get flat free wheels or make the wheels flat free. Some older Koerner ones had low capacity wheels that fail, believe MM has fixed that.
Jim


On Tuesday, December 5, 2017 at 7:22:41 AM UTC-8, wrote:
Steve invented the 3 wheeler which won't flip over in most cases. With a 2 wheeler, a problem arises during disassembly when wing is lifted off the tool to shove it into the trailer............the out-rigger wheels are retracted and you must remember to extend them or the stand will fall over as you lift the wing, prior to shoving it into the trailer. If the tool falls over it will most likely strike your fuselage! Ask me how I know this to be true!

The 3 wheeler with lateral adjustment does have a hidden flaw. Steve's original design didn't have lateral adjustment and the vertical post was welded in a stable location. The lateral modification alllowes the vertical post to move well past the "stable" location of the original design. If the operator forgets to lock the lateral adjustment, a slight wind can/will allow the rig to move all the way to the "unstable" end position and the wing and tool can flip over.........ask me how I know this?
All in all, I believe the 3 wheeler to be the better design, but both models demand your un-divided attention!
Hope this helps,
JJ


  #2  
Old December 5th 17, 09:02 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
chuck[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9
Default IMI versus MM Fab Riggers

Agree with JS on the Udo rig. Any idea where he got his crank mechanism?
Chuck
  #3  
Old December 5th 17, 11:21 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Jock Proudfoot
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 91
Default IMI versus MM Fab Riggers

At 20:02 05 December 2017, chuck wrote:
Agree with JS on the Udo rig. Any idea where he got his crank

mechanism?
Chuck


Mercedes car jack from the junk yard for the first few. Later he bought
them new from a car dealer.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LPV versus LNAV/VNAV versus LNAV+V Wyatt Emmerich[_2_] Instrument Flight Rules 6 December 17th 07 02:38 AM
F-8 versus F-4 Doug \Woody\ and Erin Beal Naval Aviation 43 October 12th 05 09:49 PM
F-8 versus F-100 Doug \Woody\ and Erin Beal Naval Aviation 6 May 16th 05 11:01 PM
"zero" versus "oscar" versus "sierra" Ron Garret Piloting 30 December 20th 04 09:49 AM
Self-Riggers and disassembly of wings Stewart Kissel Soaring 11 August 19th 03 03:56 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:09 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.