![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hi again Ed,
Thanks for your swift reply. The book you mention isn't in my library, I'll try to get hold of a copy. These however I *do* have, but while most of them mention CM, and some even have pictures, none of them has a picture of that rear cockpit: F-105 Thunderchief (Detail & Scale) Bert Kinzey F-105 Thunderchief, Warbirds Illustrated 49, Robert F. Dorr F-105 Thunderchief, Kev Darling F-105 Thunderchief in action, Lou Drendel F-105 Thunderchief in action, 2nd edition, Ken Neubeck Republic F-105 Thunderchief, David Anderton Thud, Lou Drendel Walk Around F-105Thunderchief, Ken Neubeck Century Series, Lou Drendel Century series fighters, F-100 Super Sabre - F-106 Delta Dart, Peter R. Foster Wild Weasel, The SAM suppression story, Larry Davis ....and of course When thunder rolled. As to why I would model a "fartin' Martin" : I'm currently modelling all aircraft types that caried out the Wild Weasel mission. Browsing through my documentation, I've found out that one of the aircraft modified to CM was later converted to a G-model and survived the war. In the 80ies Monogram made a kit of this particular G-type (nicknamed Mutley the Flying Dog), which I bought during my military service some 20 years ago. I thought it would be neat to have the two of them next to eachother on the shelf. A Ryan's Raider is also on my list, provided I can find another of these Monogram F-105F's. The T-StickII is not very high on my list, as it was never used in SEA, and the C&M conversion kit is more expensive than the kit itself. Anyhow, once more my sincere gratitude for your answer. Eventhough I'm not all that much the wiser, I think I now know enough to tackle the matter. After all: if *you* can't tell, who in IPMS Gent will be able to prove wrong my efforts? PS: take a look at my latest baby on: http://users.pandora.be/IPMS.GENT/ee...hantom%20E.htm Cheers, Steven "Ed Rasimus" wrote in message ... On Mon, 30 Aug 2004 10:14:48 GMT, "ikke" wrote: Ed, As I'm planning to build a model of a Combat Martin F-105F, I was wondering if you could shed some light on a question I cannot seem to find an answer to, inspite of the dozen books on the F-105 in my library and the mass of information on the Internet. Here is what I already know: the F-105F's that were modified for the Combat Martin programme received a large blade areal behind the rear cockpit and also had the rear ejection seat removed to make room for the electronics associated with the programme. What I don't know: was the rear cockpit also stripped of side consoles, stick and instrument panel? What shape and size were the block boxes that replaced the bang seat? Pictures availlable show nothing above the canopy sills. Would the entire back tub been covered with a tarp, like the "hell hole" behind the F-18 pilot? Perhaps you can point met to some pictures that show the interior of the rear cockpit? You've probably already checked Dennis Jenkin's "F-105 Thunderchief", pp 103-104 which offers a short description of the Combat Martin program and a pair of pix of the airplane with the blade antenna. That's all I know about the program as it was after my tenure in the F-105 and by the time I returned to Korat in the F-4 all of the CM aircraft had been modded to F-105G status. The text from Jenkin's says only that the seat and instrument panel were removed for the ALQ-59 comm jammer system. Certainly if the seat had to be removed, it can be assumed that the stick would come out as well--but, that's not a great mod. It's unlikely that the side consoles would be removed, because the constraint of the fuselage canopy rails would limit the size of the package that could be inserted (unless the CM system was multiple boxes rather than a single unit. I honestly don't know. Jenkin's reports further that the CM system was never employed over NVN and the airplanes were used as basic bomb-droppers, flown solo from the front seat (no real problem here, since the F-model was regularly flown that way in RTU by students). Because of the sensitivity of the equipment, the airplane was restricted in bombing parameters and target areas. (During the period in question, bombing of NVN was halted.) Why model a very minimal and apparently unsuccessful program? Why not a T-stick II or Ryan's Raider F-model? Ed Rasimus Fighter Pilot (USAF-Ret) "When Thunder Rolled" "Phantom Flights, Bangkok Nights" Both from Smithsonian Books ***www.thunderchief.org |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| VOR/DME Approach Question | Chip Jones | Instrument Flight Rules | 47 | August 29th 04 06:03 AM |
| A question on Airworthiness Inspection | Dave S | Home Built | 1 | August 10th 04 06:07 AM |
| Question | Charles S | Home Built | 4 | April 5th 04 10:10 PM |
| Question about Question 4488 | [email protected] | Instrument Flight Rules | 3 | October 27th 03 02:26 AM |
| Question For Ed Rasimus | Frank Hitlaw | Military Aviation | 2 | August 7th 03 06:03 PM |