A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

F/A-22 IRST?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 2nd 04, 03:00 AM
phil hunt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Sun, 29 Aug 2004 22:11:54 -0400, Kevin Brooks wrote:

The F-22 was to have an IRST, but it was subsequently deleted from the
program.


Do you happen to know why?

--
"It's easier to find people online who openly support the KKK than
people who openly support the RIAA" -- comment on Wikipedia
(Email: zen19725 at zen dot co dot uk)


  #2  
Old September 3rd 04, 02:17 AM
Scott Ferrin
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Thu, 2 Sep 2004 02:00:02 +0100, (phil hunt)
wrote:

On Sun, 29 Aug 2004 22:11:54 -0400, Kevin Brooks wrote:

The F-22 was to have an IRST, but it was subsequently deleted from the
program.


Do you happen to know why?



$$$$$
  #3  
Old September 3rd 04, 05:40 AM
Kevin Brooks
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"phil hunt" wrote in message
.. .
On Sun, 29 Aug 2004 22:11:54 -0400, Kevin Brooks

wrote:

The F-22 was to have an IRST, but it was subsequently deleted from the
program.


Do you happen to know why?


IIRC, it was mostly money and project timeline concerns; it was thought that
as the aircraft's primary weapons and other sensors adequately (or more than
adequately) support its BVR mission, and along with its stealthiness, that
it was not a "have to have" item in the initial operational version. It may
have also been influenced by sensor fusion concerns--it will already have
what is probably the most complex and ambitious sensor fusion capability
flying, and adding another sensor into the mix could have been more trouble
than it is worth at this time. I believe the IRST will likely be included in
future spirals, and a FLIR/target designation capability will undoubtedly be
added in the first spiral.

Brooks



  #4  
Old September 3rd 04, 08:32 PM
Dweezil Dwarftosser
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

phil hunt wrote:

On Sun, 29 Aug 2004 22:11:54 -0400, Kevin Brooks wrote:

The F-22 was to have an IRST, but it was subsequently deleted from the
program.


Do you happen to know why?


Probably because every IR search-and-track mechanism
ever made has failed to be worth its cost.
(Very short range, complicated electronics, sometimes-
dunious operation.)
  #5  
Old September 3rd 04, 08:35 PM
Kevin Brooks
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Dweezil Dwarftosser" wrote in message
...
phil hunt wrote:

On Sun, 29 Aug 2004 22:11:54 -0400, Kevin Brooks

wrote:

The F-22 was to have an IRST, but it was subsequently deleted from the
program.


Do you happen to know why?


Probably because every IR search-and-track mechanism
ever made has failed to be worth its cost.
(Very short range, complicated electronics, sometimes-
dunious operation.)


The LMCO AIRST destined (at one time) for the F-22 is based upon the IRST
used in the F-14, which from what I have read is not a very bad system. Cost
was the major reason AIRST was dumped.

Brooks


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Delivery of Raptor delayed Henry J Cobb Military Aviation 48 July 22nd 04 02:45 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.