![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#91
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
...AND the tax subsidies. Don't forget about the tax subsidies to GA!
|
#92
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"twenty twenty-five" should be interpreted the same way as "twenty
three" or "twenty nine". ![]() So, for a woman, it means 35, 33, or 39... No. It means 45. Jose -- There are more ways to skin a cat than there are cats. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
#93
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Peter R. writes:
That is actually very bad advice to those pilots who value their medical certificate. A real pilot knows not to place the responsibilities of normal healthcare in the hands of the same doctor who signs one's medical certificate. Hmm ... how come? -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#94
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Unless her birthday was between August 17 (the date of her
self-proclaiming "in my 20's" post) and today, then she is still in her 20's... I guess it is in the realm of possibility but the odds are against her... Please just let me be right on this one!! My wife will tell you I don't get to be right that often. ;-) Emily, Rachel or whatever her name is is in her 20's and I was correct in my assessment.. Gotta love Google Group's searches... Gary Drescher wrote: "Peter R." wrote in message ... Emily wrote: Jon Kraus wrote: I can tell by your posts that you aren't out of your twenties yet. Am I wrong? Yes. And honestly, that "I'm so mature I think I can tell when people are young" isn't mature, it's just annoying. Nothing personal, but you did imply you were twenty-something in a previous post, found here in Google's archives: http://tinyurl.com/jeyy4 It's possible to have been in your twenties previously, but no longer. --Gary |
#95
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I don't know... she's already lied about her age.... ;-)
Dave S wrote: Based on your version of events being 100% truthful and accurate, |
#96
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Gary Drescher wrote:
It asks both. It asks if you've ever been diagnosed for the specified conditions, and it asks if you've ever had the specified conditions. how would you know if you have never been diagnosed? (I am not talking about common sense or being smart here, but about plausible deniability) --Sylvain |
#97
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Mortimer Schnerd, RN" mschnerdatcarolina.rr.com wrote:
They do not send letters out to every physician in the state asking: "do you know this person?". they don't have to; unless she paid the visit cash, the info is known to the health insurance; in turn the health insurance companies share information, not only between themselves, but also with whatever information aggregator is willing to pay for it; in turn, anyone willing to pay lexis-nexis -- or whoever else -- fee, has access to it too. The funny part is that these info are kept for who knows how long, and by people who have no obligation to keep it accurate... Now where it becomes really fun is that a physician doesn't actually need to have met you in person before contributing to your medical file (I found out for instance that I was described as a female patient -- which I am not -- in one of the record of an hospital where spent several months following an accident -- i.e., it's not as if they didn't have time to have a look) --Sylvain |
#98
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Sylvain" wrote in message ... "Mortimer Schnerd, RN" mschnerdatcarolina.rr.com wrote: They do not send letters out to every physician in the state asking: "do you know this person?". they don't have to; unless she paid the visit cash, the info is known to the health insurance; in turn the health insurance companies share information, not only between themselves, but also with whatever information aggregator is willing to pay for it; in turn, anyone willing to pay lexis-nexis -- or whoever else -- fee, has access to it too. The funny part is that these info are kept for who knows how long, and by people who have no obligation to keep it accurate... Now where it becomes really fun is that a physician doesn't actually need to have met you in person before contributing to your medical file (I found out for instance that I was described as a female patient -- which I am not -- in one of the record of an hospital where spent several months following an accident -- i.e., it's not as if they didn't have time to have a look) --Sylvain HIPPA Laws: http://www.hhs.gov/ocr/privacysummar...ipaa%20laws%22 Covers what can and can't be shared and by whom. Jay B |
#100
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Peter R. wrote:
Mxsmanic wrote: Emily writes: This wasn't an AME. Then see a doctor who is. I doubt that she will concur with this armchair diagnosis of depression. Better yet, find an AME who is also a psychiatrist, if such exist. That is actually very bad advice to those pilots who value their medical certificate. A real pilot knows not to place the responsibilities of normal healthcare in the hands of the same doctor who signs one's medical certificate. He's giving medical advice now? What you said cannot be made clear enough to people who do not know. DO NOT use an AME as your normal doctor. NEVER. EVER. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
medical question: childhood heart murmur | [email protected] | Piloting | 43 | August 8th 05 03:42 AM |
Question about medical certificate and Zyban... | [email protected] | Piloting | 27 | July 28th 05 03:57 PM |
Student Pilot Who Gets 5 Months for Lying on His Application for Medical | [email protected] | Home Built | 2 | June 30th 05 03:00 AM |
Sport Pilot cuts off special issuance at the knees | Juan~--~Jimenez | Home Built | 40 | August 10th 04 01:19 PM |