If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#91
|
|||
|
|||
" jls" wrote:
The intelligence services fed Bush all he needed in the English language: two times in August before the "big bombs" on 9-11 he received warnings of specific credible threats. You haven't posted squat in terms of evidence of any "specific credible threats"... but don't let that disturb your attempt to rewrite history. Of course, you can continue to ignore the dozens of FBI investigations that were underway due to the NON-specific threats that WERE contained in the inelligence briefs. And you can restore some of your credibility by simply posting a credible citation of a "specific credible threat" that you seem to think existed. That won't happen, of course, but it's important to give you the opportunity. Mark "ball's in your court" Hickey |
#92
|
|||
|
|||
Mark Hickey wrote:
And you can restore some of your credibility by simply posting a credible citation of a "specific credible threat" that you seem to think existed. Nope. That won't help. Even if there was a direct and credible threat, what was Bush supposed to do? Shut down the entire American commercial air fleet? Oh, yeah. That would go over like a lead balloon. JLS must not only point out a knowledge of a specific threat, but he must give some indication of what reasonable measures could have been taken to alleviate that threat. I know people are going to die horrible deaths today. Some may even crash their airplanes. Unfortunately, I dont' know who or where they are. There's just a threat. Now what can I do about it? |
#93
|
|||
|
|||
"Mark Hickey" wrote in message ... " jls" wrote: The intelligence services fed Bush all he needed in the English language: two times in August before the "big bombs" on 9-11 he received warnings of specific credible threats. You haven't posted squat in terms of evidence of any "specific credible threats"... but don't let that disturb your attempt to rewrite history. Oh, dear. Don't you just talk like a kept woman defending her benefactor --- while he's a global laughingstock for his indifference to daily briefings putting him on notice that the little muslim goat would do something spectacular here in the USA, like butt down the Taj Mahals of American corporatocracy. Of course, you can continue to ignore the dozens of FBI investigations that were underway due to the NON-specific threats that WERE contained in the inelligence briefs. The intelligence services and the FBI are culpable too, but your Preznit still had enough info to act, and glaringly didn't. These words seem to be apposite: "From a distance, it looks as if the warning [of 9-11] came but they all were on vacation." Of course it might do you well, if you can comprehend better than Bushism can, to read the entire article: http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB116/ And you can restore some of your credibility by simply posting a credible citation of a "specific credible threat" that you seem to think existed. I already have and you choose to spin on it--- even more pitifully than Condoleeza did. That won't happen, of course, yapyapyap How many terrorist cells right here in the good ol' "safe" USA did Bush get warning of? And how many more inculpating PDB's is he concealing to CHA? Pathetic. And now *AIN'T* it really safe since Americans are being punished with Constitution-bashing abortions like the Patriot Act and stupid GA flight restrictions because of conspicuous thugs like Mohammed Atta and Marwan al-Shehri --- so conspicuous that Bush never even had a clue. Yeah, these trained Arab terrorists were making spectacles of themselves going around the country bragging, spending profigately, learning in our flight simulators and on our airports how to steer airliners but not take off or land them, recruiting from hundreds of other islamic freaks lingering like little trojan horses inside our borders, reeking with hostile mohammedanism, and chatting by cellphones with their holy father, Osama. Oh, if you read right carefully (better than Bush I suspect) you see that his press guys like Ari can leave out a preposition here and there and change the whole meaning in the minds of the American public. |
#94
|
|||
|
|||
" jls" wrote:
.... nothing of substance. I didn't think you could come up with anything showing there was a credible and actionable threat. Thanks for playing anyway. Mark "everyone else on the left let this dead horse lay in November" Hickey |
#95
|
|||
|
|||
"Mark Hickey" wrote in message ... " jls" wrote: ... nothing of substance. I didn't think you could come up with anything showing there was a credible and actionable threat. Thanks for playing anyway. Mark "everyone else on the left let this dead horse lay in November" Hickey You don't even reply to the posts--- you simply stamp your amateurish spin on them. So go back to aggravating the trade imbalance with China. That's your motivation and makes you so cozy with the neo-fascists and neo-conservaloons anyway. You probably can't even weld titanium yourself or ride a bike, just farm that out to "aerospace welders" in China, heheheh. BTW, what aircraft are you building? Nothing I bet. These words seem to be apposite: "From a distance, it looks as if the warning [of 9-11] came but they all were on vacation." Of course it might do you well, if you can comprehend better than Bushism can, to read the entire article: http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB116/ And you can restore some of your credibility by simply posting a credible citation of a "specific credible threat" that you seem to think existed. I already have and you choose to spin on it--- even more pitifully than Condoleeza did. That won't happen, of course, yapyapyap How many terrorist cells right here in the good ol' "safe" USA did Bush get warning of? And how many more inculpating PDB's is he concealing to CHA? Pathetic. And now *AIN'T* it really safe since Americans are being punished with Constitution-bashing abortions like the Patriot Act and stupid GA flight restrictions because of conspicuous thugs like Mohammed Atta and Marwan al-Shehri --- so conspicuous that Bush never even had a clue. Yeah, these trained Arab terrorists were making spectacles of themselves going around the country bragging, spending profigately, learning in our flight simulators and on our airports how to steer airliners but not take off or land them, recruiting from hundreds of other islamic freaks lingering like little trojan horses inside our borders, reeking with hostile mohammedanism, and chatting by cellphones with their holy father, Osama. Oh, if you read right carefully (better than Bush I suspect) you see that his press guys like Ari can leave out a preposition here and there and change the whole meaning in the minds of the American public. |
#96
|
|||
|
|||
" jls" wrote:
Of course it might do you well, if you can comprehend better than Bushism can, to read the entire article: http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB116/ And like I keep saying, there's no credible threat, certainly nothing indicating that terrorists are about to fly planes into skyscrapers. What is it about that you don't understand? Mark "there are none so blind as those who will not see" Hickey |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Diamond DA-40 with G-1000 pirep | C J Campbell | Instrument Flight Rules | 117 | July 22nd 04 05:40 PM |
Diamond DA-40 with G-1000 pirep | C J Campbell | Piloting | 114 | July 22nd 04 05:40 PM |
Pilot Error? Is it Mr. Damron? | Badwater Bill | Home Built | 3 | June 23rd 04 04:05 PM |
Ex-Navy pilot sent to prison for smuggling Ecstasy Ex-Navy pilot sent to prison for smuggling Ecstasy | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | June 16th 04 10:28 PM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 01:27 PM |