![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#91
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Somehow, looking at the Thiert web site, it doesn't look like they are
selling very many engines yet. Mike Schumann "C J Campbell" wrote in message ... "Mike Schumann" wrote in message nk.net... I'm surprised there isn't more interest in the diesel version in the US. What percentage of DA40s sold in Europe are diesel vs. gas? I believe it is 100%. |
#92
|
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message ... Dude wrote: Let me add that the bizjet guys get WHATEVER they want at these FBO's. I am NOT kidding. If they complain about piston traffic, it will be noted, and something may change. Some FBO's simply give these guys whatever they want, Period. I have heard it from the FBO and airport managers that I talk to. One comment was that the biz jet crowd did not want any "looky lou's" around as they came and went. This FBO leased the surrounding land to keep other business from being too close, as well as started to harrass one of their tenants, a flight school, about the foot traffic on the ramp. The school was locked out in an attempt to get them to leave their lease. I didn't fall off the turnip truck yesterday. Sure, the biz jet crowd wants a nice, upscale FBO. So, isn't that the American Way? Also, if the airport has any federal grant money in it, the fair use conditions are beyond the control of the airport manager. Ya, right. Lets's see. You can't get a hangar, you can't get a tie down, your parking area at the FBO is over Yonder, yes sir, we have avgas at $4.50 a gallon, shall we top it off for you? Yes, well since the flight school was closed due to noise complaints, we don't sell much avgas, so we charge a lot for the few folks left becuase the truck still costs the same. Yes sir, the field on the other side of town does have it for half that price, I tell everyone they should buy it there. Fair use my ... Don't depend on that to support you. My home field, KCRQ, was extensive light aircraft and biz jet operations. In fact, it also has several commuter flights a day. It all seems to work quite well and has for many years. I am happy for you, I will try to talk my wife into moving so we can join you. Seriously, I know lots of airports just like that, but I also know many others where the fights are just beginning to boil. I think the stakes are higher near metro areas where land is more valuable. I will concede that the primary noise complaints come from light aircraft pilots who fail to maintain altitude on downwind leg, something the biz jet pilots avoid doing. You may be correct, I always thought it was the amount of time they spent overhead. You can't hear a piston plane inside your house, but even when you can here a jet inside, its quick. Sometimes a small plane can buzz around for a while getting a picture or something, and even bother me. |
#93
|
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message ... Not so, my closest airport just announced plans to kick almost half the GA tenants off the field to make the airlines happy. The cities want the bizjets and the airlines because they see the revenue. We are just an irritation. One local municipal has made a commitment to support "limited" piston GA activity because someone persuasive pointed out that a lot of jet owners and wealthy home owners also had prop planes. Also, the press has been full of majors, and the politicians they have lobbied, attacking GA. I separated "airlines" from "biz jets." Apparently, you don't see the difference. After your snipping, and your short response, I don't understand what you are getting at here. |
#94
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ahh, but they, Thielert, have no plans to support the engine in the US (
nor does Superior). They think the plane manufacturers should do this. Textron is delighted, as this will mean that they can continue to control the business that has the best chance of defeating them. Diamond has decided to offer Lycoming engines as an alternate for the Twin Star (which must really please Textron) btw- It's enough horsepower for the skyhawk and cherokee planes. "Thomas Borchert" wrote in message ... Dude, The Centurion could, if well supported, and up to its marketing, replace about every engine in the 140 to 180 HP range. IMHO, the Centurion 1.7 simply is lacking the necessary power. 135 HP is not enough. The sma design has its problems, namely weight, size and price. But Thielert has seen the light: A V8, 300-HP version is in the works for 2006, and a 6-cylinder around-200-HP version is at least rumoured about. -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
#95
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dude,
Diamond has decided to offer Lycoming engines as an alternate for the Twin Star (which must really please Textron) Diamond has been bitten before when introducing a new engine to the US market, the Rotax. So they're careful. The US market is strongly in the grip of what I like to call "pilot inertia", as evident here in the group. "We've always done it that way, so we'll keep doing it that way" is strong in the pilot community. Also, a large part of the Twin Star market in the US is the training market - and that market simply won't accept one-lever operation, since it doesn't train for the real world of twin ops. btw- It's enough horsepower for the skyhawk and cherokee planes. Well, yes, kind of, at least in the case of the Cherokee. We have a commercial Thielert-172 operator at my home field doing sightseeing flights and such - he absolutely LOVES it. -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
#96
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mike,
I'm surprised there isn't more interest in the diesel version in the US. What percentage of DA40s sold in Europe are diesel vs. gas? It is not offered in the US. Simple as that. -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
#97
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mike,
it doesn't look like they are selling very many engines yet. Define "very many" in the GA market. -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
#98
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thomas Borchert wrote:
Diamond has decided to offer Lycoming engines as an alternate for the Twin Star (which must really please Textron) Diamond has been bitten before when introducing a new engine to the US market, the Rotax. So they're careful. It's not only this. First, as you've mentioned, the Thielert engine has not very much power. So there is still a demand for the stronger Lycoming engine. Second, Diamond is well aware that the first buyers of the Thielert engine are beta testers. They have never made a secret out of this. So they decided to sell the Diesel version only near their factory until they have collected enough experience. Makes a lot of sense to me. Stefan |
#99
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Tom Sixkiller wrote: Aren't they also heavier, i.e., pound of engine weight per HP generated? Every one of which I've read is heavier than an equivalent gas engine, especially with all the accessories installed. Since some of the new diesel designs are 2-stroke, and most gas engines are 4-stroke, though, some of the newer ones may actually come in lighter than the equivalent gasoline engine (if they ever make it to production). George Patterson In Idaho, tossing a rattlesnake into a crowded room is felony assault. In Tennessee, it's evangelism. |
#100
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
G.R. Patterson III wrote:
Aren't they also heavier, i.e., pound of engine weight per HP generated? Every one of which I've read is heavier than an equivalent gas engine, especially with all the accessories installed. Since some of the new diesel designs are 2-stroke, and most gas engines are 4-stroke, though, some of the newer ones may actually come in lighter than the equivalent gasoline engine (if they ever make it to production). Help me out here. Why "especially with all the accessories installed"? Why is a 2-stroke cycle engine lighter than a 4-stroke? Thanks. Dave |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Revisiting lapse rates (From: How high is that cloud?) | Icebound | Instrument Flight Rules | 5 | November 26th 04 09:41 PM |
Question, Diamond distance as unsuccessful triangle. | Roger | Aviation Marketplace | 1 | November 22nd 04 07:34 PM |
Cessna 182T w. G-1000 pirep | C J Campbell | Instrument Flight Rules | 63 | July 22nd 04 07:06 PM |
Diamond DA-40 with G-1000 pirep | C J Campbell | Instrument Flight Rules | 117 | July 22nd 04 05:40 PM |
P-38 Exhaust | Stephen Harding | Military Aviation | 10 | April 19th 04 07:03 AM |