A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Presidential TFR @ Kill Devil Hills



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #91  
Old December 17th 03, 03:58 PM
Dave
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Tom Sixkiller" wrote in message
...

"R. Hubbell" wrote in message
news:7oGDb.18330$pY.11414@fed1read04...
On Tue, 16 Dec 2003 13:05:39 GMT Dave S

wrote:

Ok.. at the risk of interrupting the partisanship here...

What makes you think that if the next prez is a Democrat that the SS..
er Secret Service will not still insist on a 60 mile diameter bubble?



You're really trying to spoil all the fun! We can only hope that the
next president will be more enlightened.


Not unless we gat an alien being from another planet in the race.


Not allowed of course because you need to have been born in the USA. I knew
the system was flawed somehow.


  #93  
Old December 17th 03, 04:19 PM
C J Campbell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Montblack" wrote in message
...
| ("MikeM" wrote)
| Bush is an IDIOT!
|
|
| Bush has the great (double) misfortune of being:
|
| 1. One of our least intelligent Presidents.

Still smarter than you.

| 2. Following one of the most intelligent Presidents this country has ever
| had.
|

Not saying much. The guy allowed himself to be blackmailed by an intern, for
crying out loud.

If intelligence had anything to do with it, they would make ME president!


--
Christopher J. Campbell
World Famous Flight Instructor
Port Orchard, WA


If you go around beating the Bush, don't complain if you rile the animals.



  #94  
Old December 17th 03, 04:22 PM
Wdtabor
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Does the constitutional right to bear arms extend to fitting up your Warrior
or other suitable flying platform with heat seeking missiles cannon etc so
that you can defend yourself from aggressors?


Yes. What part of "Shall not be infringed." do you not understand?

and does your right to protect
yourself override the FARs in that you can modify your plane accordingly.


Let's see, does a regulatory agency override the Constitution?

They may be able to require that the modifications are performed to certain
standards if you wish to overfly populated areas, but the second amendment is
pretty clear.

Don

--
Wm. Donald (Don) Tabor Jr., DDS
PP-ASEL
Chesapeake, VA - CPK, PVG
  #95  
Old December 17th 03, 05:08 PM
John Harlow
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Does anyone else find it ironic that the President's very presence at
the celebration of 100 years of powered flight has shut down almost
2,000 square miles of airspace? Couldn't he have phoned it in?



Sadly, my letter to CNN pointing this out had no effect. Damn right wing
media continues to kiss Bush's ass.


  #96  
Old December 17th 03, 05:21 PM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Montblack" wrote in message
...

Steven - just jumping in on your post because I deleted the other replies
already.

1. I don't think GW is dumb, stupid or inept.
2. I *do* think raw intellect is something you can get a sense of - much
like charisma, warmth and sincerely.

3. Intellect is not the end all in setting up a successful

administration.

4. For example: GW doesn't answer questions with a strong command of the
situation (news conferences/interviews/etc). Clinton owned those

situations
for the better part of 8 years. This is where 75% of my "Presidential
Intellect" observations come from.

If there are maybe 10 criteria that Bush, and all former Presidents are
scored on - and intellect is one of them, then I sincerely believe Bush
would rank near the bottom (compared to past Presidents) in that one
category - raw intelligence.

Now it comes down to definitions of intellect.


What did Bush do to cause you to conclude he is one of our least intelligent
Presidents? What did Clinton do to cause you to conclude he is one of our
most intelligent Presidents?


  #97  
Old December 17th 03, 05:21 PM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"John Harlow" wrote in message
...

Sadly, my letter to CNN pointing this out had no effect. Damn right wing
media continues to kiss Bush's ass.


You think CNN is right wing?


  #98  
Old December 17th 03, 05:30 PM
Booger
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Tom Sixkiller" wrote in message
...

"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message
nk.net...

"Montblack" wrote in

message
...

Bush has the great (double) misfortune of being:

1. One of our least intelligent Presidents.
2. Following one of the most intelligent Presidents this country has

ever
had.


Bush is clearly more intelligent than Clinton. Now, you'll of course
disagree with that, but if you examine their administrations you find

that
Bush has accomplished more in three years than Clinton did in eight.

At least he didn't screw up as much stuff as Clinton did (and yes, he did
lay the ground work for running the 90's boom into the ditch).

I shudder to think what would have happened, post 9/11, if Gore had been

in
office.

That said, I'll not vote to re-elect Bush, but I also shudder to think

where
we'll end up with Dean, or worse yet, Hillary in office.


So if Dean or Hillary scare you so much, vote for Bush.


  #99  
Old December 17th 03, 05:31 PM
Wdtabor
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


What did Bush do to cause you to conclude he is one of our least intelligent
Presidents? What did Clinton do to cause you to conclude he is one of our
most intelligent Presidents?


Bush's trail is littered with the political corpses of opponents who were sure
they were smarter than him.

Don

--
Wm. Donald (Don) Tabor Jr., DDS
PP-ASEL
Chesapeake, VA - CPK, PVG
  #100  
Old December 17th 03, 05:43 PM
R. Hubbell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Wed, 17 Dec 2003 12:09:32 GMT Bob Noel wrote:

In article yyRDb.23619$pY.15803@fed1read04, "R. Hubbell"
wrote:

How many hours did he log as PIC? Most pilots brag about that, in
fact
most
consider that to be the defining metric.

what military pilots do you hang around with? I've never
met a military pilot that brags about hours.


Brag is probably the wrong word but number of hours is a metric that gets
tossed around a bit. But never heard any mention of Dubya's hours as
PIC.


Well, in my limited experience (I'm not former military, and
I only worked with USAF folks, including numerous current and former
USAF pilots), I've never ever heard one discuss their hours.
I've heard about guys talk about birdstrikes, missions (peacetime
and war), aircraft characteristics, but not the number of hours.

Come to think of it, the only pilots I know of that talk about
hours like they mean anything are student pilots and recently
minted private pilots. Of course, everyone talks about the
crusty old 20,000+ pilots.



So how many hours does Dubya have as PIC?
That's what we're talking about.

R. Hubbell


--
Bob Noel

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Lockheed wins Presidential helicopter contract Tiger Naval Aviation 0 January 29th 05 05:24 AM
American nazi pond scum, version two bushite kills bushite Naval Aviation 0 December 21st 04 10:46 PM
Hey! What fun!! Let's let them kill ourselves!!! [email protected] Naval Aviation 2 December 17th 04 09:45 PM
What is the reasoning behind the smaller radius vice presidential TFR? Larry Dighera Piloting 38 November 19th 03 04:04 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:03 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.