Propeller Efficiency

On Apr 18, 11:01*pm, Nomen Nescio wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

From: "Morgans"

I had heard a few years back that audio aficionados had been going back to
some
tube technology, and you are the first specific instance that I had heard of.

Tubes never really went away in the area of music CREATION.
They tend to emphasize the uneven overtones (5ths and maj. 3rds) and give
sound a certain "warmth".
My "amp of choice" for my guitars is still an old, 1970 vintage Fender Quad Reverb.
An added benefit is that when I fire it up in the winter......it heats my house.

I always liked my Heathkit Amp, until the sound of caps gassing up, (then
blowing over/open, or whatever you want to call it) was almost as frequent as
the sound of clear music.

Hey! I built one of those.
It was still working when I sold it in the late 70's.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: N/A

iQCVAwUBSAmjwpMoscYxZNI5AQEnWQP+Oe9q4YSSnjksD57K54 pH2YAY+lro2BI1
bYa98twCwFuJYUVOQD9ADeS3uILptE06dJ0xPfimvpbJJ9JSww NMxPcxAQiBfWsU
J1kydz7OqwKnaqBwBbxyEY6qqGM8IVRhAS3rxpbURm4Nkh0GAS 6PqwsgTXTzZ2Mb
4qurrbdFu+E=
=A+Dt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Ok you guys... This is bringing back alot of wonderful memories of my
early years. I built some heathkit stuff, bought them from Olson
electronics in Miami Fla.. Ahhh, the smell of solder and the feeling
one gets when you plug it in for the first time and it doesn't smoke
or trip the breaker,,, Actually they were those screw in fuses back
then... Seems to me I killed more of the green fuses then the red
ones, but I digress......... I also agree on the fine sound of the
fender amp. I had a Strat and a bandmaster amp in another life and
those days were a great time, and the beginning of my hearing
loss. :)). Thanks for reminding me....

Now back to your regular scheduled programming. !!!!!!!!!!!!

Ben.

Le Chaud Lapin wrote in news:edd2455b-2fd7-410f-
:

On Apr 18, 11:20*pm, Nomen Nescio wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

From: Le Chaud Lapin

If you spent as much time trying to _DO_ your project as you are
spending _TALKING_ about it, you'd be halfway to failure by now.

But, if I'm wrong, I'll offer you a little advice.
Success will get every opponent to shut up.
And 3/4 of them will claim that they had faith in you, all along.

Sounds fair.

I loaded SolidWorks onto laptop yesterday. As mentioned, I will report
either success or failure, whichever occurs.


Do hurry, I'll be holding my breath.


Bertie

Nose, Bertie, nose. Hold your nose.

On Apr 19, 8:10 am, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
Le Chaud Lapin wrote in news:edd2455b-2fd7-410f-
:



On Apr 18, 11:20 pm, Nomen Nescio wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

From: Le Chaud Lapin

If you spent as much time trying to _DO_ your project as you are
spending _TALKING_ about it, you'd be halfway to failure by now.

But, if I'm wrong, I'll offer you a little advice.
Success will get every opponent to shut up.
And 3/4 of them will claim that they had faith in you, all along.

Sounds fair.

I loaded SolidWorks onto laptop yesterday. As mentioned, I will report
either success or failure, whichever occurs.

Do hurry, I'll be holding my breath.

Bertie

Tina wrote in news:28aa8896-13e0-4772-9a1f-
:

Nose, Bertie, nose. Hold your nose.


Ah, he's roadkill....


Bertie

On Apr 19, 12:46*am, Le Chaud Lapin wrote:
On Apr 18, 7:49*pm, Tina wrote:

More words. "Fiddling" indeed. Where's the meat? Where's the bun? The
first posting has demonstrated there's neither, This is a classic "and
then magic happens" just before a result is claimed.

A Skunkworks is needed, The odor is already here.

I will know sooner or later if the part that matters is feasibe or not
and give introduction here.

Putting model into SolidWorks.

-Le Chaud Lapin-

Can't you at least post a drawing or something before then?

Personally I think what you're really needing is anti-grav drive.
There was a German guy working on the theory of it. Burkhard Heim was
his name. He died, though, before completing his work. But here's a
start:

http://www.rialian.com/rnboyd/burkhard-heim.htm

Now you have to be able to read German and most physicists don't
really grasp his mathematics and system of physics, but you'd probably
make pretty good progress once you had the anti-grav drive part down
pat. The rest should be a piece of cake.

Anyway the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics awarded
a prize for a paper on the concept:

http://space.newscientist.com/articl...yperspace.html

New Scientist mentions Sandia Labs and the US Military looking into it
though, so you may simply be too late (alas!).

Still, there may be a homebuilt market for similar technology, so your
efforts might not be entirely wasted.

In article
,
wrote:

On Apr 19, 12:46*am, Le Chaud Lapin wrote:
On Apr 18, 7:49*pm, Tina wrote:

More words. "Fiddling" indeed. Where's the meat? Where's the bun? The
first posting has demonstrated there's neither, This is a classic "and
then magic happens" just before a result is claimed.

A Skunkworks is needed, The odor is already here.

I will know sooner or later if the part that matters is feasibe or not
and give introduction here.

Putting model into SolidWorks.

-Le Chaud Lapin-

Can't you at least post a drawing or something before then?

Personally I think what you're really needing is anti-grav drive.
There was a German guy working on the theory of it. Burkhard Heim was
his name. He died, though, before completing his work. But here's a
start:

http://www.rialian.com/rnboyd/burkhard-heim.htm

Now you have to be able to read German and most physicists don't
really grasp his mathematics and system of physics, but you'd probably
make pretty good progress once you had the anti-grav drive part down
pat. The rest should be a piece of cake.

Anyway the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics awarded
a prize for a paper on the concept:

http://space.newscientist.com/articl...-into-hyperspa
ce.html

New Scientist mentions Sandia Labs and the US Military looking into it
though, so you may simply be too late (alas!).

Still, there may be a homebuilt market for similar technology, so your
efforts might not be entirely wasted.


THe above type of concept is what we would need in order to fly to other
planets and the stars on a routine basis. It certainly piques the
imagination!

--
Remove _'s from email address to talk to me.

On Apr 19, 2:34*pm, wrote:
On Apr 19, 12:46*am, Le Chaud Lapin wrote:
Can't you at least post a drawing or something before then?

I will as soon as I figure out a configuration that works. The ones I
have conceived so far might have power-output problems, even for one-
seat aircraft. There is a lot of math, with cyclic dependendies that
has to be worked out.

Personally I think what you're really needing is anti-grav drive.
There was a German guy working on the theory of it. Burkhard Heim was
his name. He died, though, before completing his work. But here's a
start:

http://www.rialian.com/rnboyd/burkhard-heim.htm

Now you have to be able to read German and most physicists don't
really grasp his mathematics and system of physics, but you'd probably
make pretty good progress once you had the anti-grav drive part down
pat. The rest should be a piece of cake.

Anyway the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics awarded
a prize for a paper on the concept:

http://space.newscientist.com/articl...ke-a-leap-into...

Hmmm...never seen that before.

New Scientist mentions Sandia Labs and the US Military looking into it
though, so you may simply be too late (alas!).

Still, there may be a homebuilt market for similar technology, so your
efforts might not be entirely wasted.

My still-in-thought idea is far less exotic. Everything is based
Newtonian physics.

whats this ****?
Nomen Nescio explained on 4/19/2008 :
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: N/A

iQCVAwUBSAmjwpMoscYxZNI5AQEnWQP+Oe9q4YSSnjksD57K54 pH2YAY+lro2BI1
bYa98twCwFuJYUVOQD9ADeS3uILptE06dJ0xPfimvpbJJ9JSww NMxPcxAQiBfWsU
J1kydz7OqwKnaqBwBbxyEY6qqGM8IVRhAS3rxpbURm4Nkh0GAS 6PqwsgTXTzZ2Mb
4qurrbdFu+E=
=A+Dt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

On Sun, 20 Apr 2008 03:05:55 -0400, clint
wrote:

whats this ****?
Nomen Nescio explained on 4/19/2008 :
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: N/A

iQCVAwUBSAmjwpMoscYxZNI5AQEnWQP+Oe9q4YSSnjksD57K54 pH2YAY+lro2BI1
bYa98twCwFuJYUVOQD9ADeS3uILptE06dJ0xPfimvpbJJ9JSww NMxPcxAQiBfWsU
J1kydz7OqwKnaqBwBbxyEY6qqGM8IVRhAS3rxpbURm4Nkh0GAS 6PqwsgTXTzZ2Mb
4qurrbdFu+E=
=A+Dt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


It's a PGP signature. If you have a PGP decoder and download his
public key it's used to prove the message came from who it says it did
since nobody else's private key will encrypt to the appropriate string
above. Eliminates people forging posts since they either won't post
with a PGP key (rules the post in as a forgery if the real user always
posts a key), or the string won't validate against the real user's
public key.

On 2008-04-20, Peter Clark wrote:
It's a PGP signature. If you have a PGP decoder and download his
public key it's used to prove the message came from who it says it did
since nobody else's private key will encrypt to the appropriate string
above.

Except for one minor detail: since the guy hides behind an anonymizer,
there's no information gained from the fact that the message passes the
signature test, since all it proves is that the same anonymous coward posted
each one.
--
Jay Maynard, K5ZC http://www.conmicro.com
http://jmaynard.livejournal.com http://www.tronguy.net
Fairmont, MN (FRM) (Yes, that's me!)
AMD Zodiac CH601XLi N55ZC (ordered 17 March, delivery 2 June)