![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#101
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jay Honeck" wrote in message news:e9HSd.16228$4D6.7303@attbi_s51... You know, Peter, I can't decide which is worse: Having a person in academic authority like Churchill teaching this kind of tripe to our youth, or having a relatively intelligent member of our society like you exercising moral relativism (on such a grand scale!) in defense of an indefensible position. "In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist. We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or democratic processes. We should take nothing for granted. Only an alert and knowledgeable citizenry can compel the proper meshing of the huge industrial and military machinery of defense with our peaceful methods and goals, so that security and liberty may prosper together." ---- President Dwight D. Eisenhower (Republican), 1961. You give our youth way too little credit. They can read President Eisenhower, they can read Ward Churchill, they can listen to President Bush, and they will do their own research to reach closer to the truth. If it is indeed tripe, if the position is indefensible... it won't take that long for it to be abandoned by the students. Try to suppress an idea, no matter how obnoxious, and it raises their suspicion that you have something to hide. You may brainwash a few to one ideology, and you may brainwash a few to another, but the vast majority will make up their own mind quite well. The term "Academic authority" may be applicable to a 10-year-old, but I doubt very much that your average University student holds ANY prof as being "authority", especially in political and social disciplines. |
#102
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Icebound" wrote in message ... "Jay Honeck" wrote in message news:e9HSd.16228$4D6.7303@attbi_s51... You know, Peter, I can't decide which is worse: Having a person in academic authority like Churchill teaching this kind of tripe to our youth, or having a relatively intelligent member of our society like you exercising moral relativism (on such a grand scale!) in defense of an indefensible position. "In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist. We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or democratic processes. We should take nothing for granted. Only an alert and knowledgeable citizenry can compel the proper meshing of the huge industrial and military machinery of defense with our peaceful methods and goals, so that security and liberty may prosper together." ---- President Dwight D. Eisenhower (Republican), 1961. You give our youth way too little credit. They can read President Eisenhower, they can read Ward Churchill, they can listen to President Bush, and they will do their own research to reach closer to the truth. If it is indeed tripe, if the position is indefensible... it won't take that long for it to be abandoned by the students. Try to suppress an idea, no matter how obnoxious, and it raises their suspicion that you have something to hide. You may brainwash a few to one ideology, and you may brainwash a few to another, but the vast majority will make up their own mind quite well. The term "Academic authority" may be applicable to a 10-year-old, but I doubt very much that your average University student holds ANY prof as being "authority", especially in political and social disciplines. I know this adds nothing to the discussion, but I just have to say great post! Michael |
#103
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
("Icebound" wrote)
snip "In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist. We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or democratic processes. We should take nothing for granted. Only an alert and knowledgeable citizenry can compel the proper meshing of the huge industrial and military machinery of defense with our peaceful methods and goals, so that security and liberty may prosper together." ---- President Dwight D. Eisenhower (Republican), 1961. It is my understanding that Ike wanted to use the term Congressional-Military-Industrial Complex (or something similar) but was talked out of it. It was the critical role Congress plays, in that corrupting process, that Eisenhower was warning future generations to be on guard against. Again, it is my understanding that the gist of the threat was gutted when 'Congressional' was removed from the text. Also, I seem to recall that Ike wrote a fair amount of that speach himself. Montblack |
#104
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Peter Duniho" wrote in message ... "Jay Honeck" wrote in message news:e9HSd.16228$4D6.7303@attbi_s51... [...] I'll say this about it, though: Your post better illustrates everything that is wrong with the Left, and its "nothing is black and white in a gray world" philosophy, than anything I could have ever said. And your post (and John's) simply affirms exactly what I said would happen. Thank you very much for proving my point. You're probably too old for you to ever get over the "Left versus Right" mentality. If you haven't done it by now, you probably never will. But suffice to say, it's not a useful way to think about things. Pete You know, it is kind of interesting. It used to be everything Red was bad, and there was no blue, it was just USA... |
#105
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Icebound" wrote in message ... You give our youth way too little credit. They can read President Eisenhower, they can read Ward Churchill, they can listen to President Bush, and they will do their own research to reach closer to the truth. If it is indeed tripe, if the position is indefensible... it won't take that long for it to be abandoned by the students. Try to suppress an idea, no matter how obnoxious, and it raises their suspicion that you have something to hide. You may brainwash a few to one ideology, and you may brainwash a few to another, but the vast majority will make up their own mind quite well. The term "Academic authority" may be applicable to a 10-year-old, but I doubt very much that your average University student holds ANY prof as being "authority", especially in political and social disciplines. You've got that right! |
#106
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Montblack" wrote in message ... (Waiting for the President of Harvard angle in this thread) Women teachers should never be given tenure? |
#107
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Montblack" wrote in message ... ("Steven P. McNicoll") I'm done. I'm not surprised. Bye. Bye. Do you like my hat? I do not like that hat. I like your hat. I like your cat. Is the cat there? It the cat anywhere? (First Amendment according to Dr. Suess) |
#108
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Matt Barrow" wrote in message ... "Montblack" wrote in message ... ("Steven P. McNicoll") I'm done. I'm not surprised. Bye. Bye. Do you like my hat? I do not like that hat. I like your hat. I like your cat. Is the cat there? It the cat anywhere? The cat is in the hat |
#109
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Peter Duniho" writes:
You're probably too old for you to ever get over the "Left versus Right" mentality. If you haven't done it by now, you probably never will. But suffice to say, it's not a useful way to think about things. I don't think age is the factor for being unable to see different viewpoints (let alone accept some). Rather, it's intellectual isolation; perhaps a fear, akin to religionists, that a new idea may upset one's belief system. You might find out that everything you thought you knew, you didn't. Anyway, thanks for pointing out the uselessness of "left vs. right", a.k.a. us vs. them, good vs. evil, right vs. wrong. Binary choices are good for digital computers and little else. |
#110
|
|||
|
|||
![]() ("Chris" wrote) Do you like my hat? I do not like that hat. I like your hat. I like your cat. Is the cat there? It the cat anywhere? The cat is in the hat Dogs are in the tree. (NAC) Necessary Aviation Content: There's a dog piloting a helicopter at the cat-free tree "party." Montblack |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Bush Pilots Fly-In. South Africa. | Bush Air | Home Built | 0 | May 25th 04 06:18 AM |
Veteran fighter pilots try to help close training gap | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | December 2nd 03 10:09 PM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |
Israeli Air Force to lose Middle East Air Superiority Capability to the Saudis in the near future | Jack White | Military Aviation | 71 | September 21st 03 02:58 PM |