America's Army Sucks, Fact

Rubbish. Soldiers from all over the empire were needed to subdue a
handful of Boers. The only difference between Germans and Boers is
numbers. Boers are top-quality fighters. Tough as nails.

True,Boer war a foretaste what was coming as Boers,unlike populations british
colonies,were continrntal Europeans.
But still British managed to subdue Boers without help from US,USSR etc.

Soldiers all over empire were obviously present during both world wars.

Note that in neither WW1 nor WW2 did Germany fight on its
own. In WW1 it allied with the Austro-Hungarian Empire
and Turkey. In WW2 its allies included Italy, Rumania, Hungary
and Bulgaria

Care to name British allies including British colonies?

The Boers were rather fewer in number than Germans

Surely,but Brits proved to be hardly capable of dealing with a such opponent,in
spite of long and glorious colonial experience.
BTW wo were those Boers,an African.Indian or Arab tribe maybe?

Not to mention slavemasters


Weren't Greeks and Romans too slavemasters?

The Germans never achieved criticality in a reactor.

Yeah right,I am sure you have never heard location names like
Klein-Machnow,Lichterfelde,Pilsen,Kummersdorfthe places that even Hitler's
personal bodyguard Engel was not allowed to enter and escort Hitler inside.
If you think Germans never achived criticality then you must ask US government
"where Hiroshima and Nagazaki bombs came from?"

Remember the "Bismark"? or the "Tirpitz"? or any other German
ship of WWII? That little Navy with "garbage" for ships sank virtually
all of them. And, despite your parroting of Nazi propaganda, the UK
was never in danger of "choking". Also note that the UK produced

Do you remember PoW and Repulse or Yamato ?
After Mitchell demo it was clear that the fate of Battleship was sealed but all
navies and Admirals continued to order them,they were their "showboats".
I am sure if US had used battleships the way they supposed to be used,like
Brits,Germans and Japsen and forgat new threats, above list might include names
like New Jersey etc.

No, history doesn't bother me like it does you. You are the loon that
keeps trying to assert that the US ruled forever and invented
everything. You can't admit that most of our modern a/c, designs, and
space program came from the Reich. It's a fact pal and the German

You are forgetting something,in US image is eveything,on other hand in central
European cultures substance and thinking are highly valued commodities.
The most powerful image maker of US is also most powerful weapon of US,namely
Hollywood.
But in an era when the knowledge and information are available to almost
everyone at real time and almost at no cost ,everybody can see that the "King
is naked" in spite of rhe efforts of image makers.
Of course,the similarities with Guetenberg's printing press are purely
coincidental.

Why did they lose?

If you pick a fight with 14 ordinary guys,you get beaten up at the end,even if
you were Mike Tyson.

WHAT wind tunnel data?

Do you know why ALL F111s were produced WITH a major design flaw ?

In article , Kevin Brooks
writes

"Peter Twydell" wrote in message
...
In article , robert
arndt writes

snip

Rob

p.s. Can't wait for the two pinheads to chime in too- Keith Willshaw
and Al Minyard.


Is it any wonder that many people regard the Germans as arrogant?

Actually, Arndt is (sadly) a USian--I doubt modern Germans would accept the
likes of him over there, being apparently quite a bit smarter in their usual
interpretation of WWII events and developments than he exhibits.

If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck,...

Brooks


Brooks


Rob

--
Peter

Ying tong iddle-i po!



--
Peter

Ying tong iddle-i po!

"Denyav" wrote in message
...
Note that in neither WW1 nor WW2 did Germany fight on its
own. In WW1 it allied with the Austro-Hungarian Empire
and Turkey. In WW2 its allies included Italy, Rumania, Hungary
and Bulgaria

Care to name British allies including British colonies?


Not offhand but the fact that we were rather better
at recruiting allies than Germany reflects rather
well on the diplomatic aspects of the war.

The Boers were rather fewer in number than Germans

Surely,but Brits proved to be hardly capable of dealing with a such
opponent,in
spite of long and glorious colonial experience.
BTW wo were those Boers,an African.Indian or Arab tribe maybe?

Not to mention slavemasters


Weren't Greeks and Romans too slavemasters?

Indeed but that was 200 years previously.

Keith




----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

"Denyav" wrote in message
...
Why did they lose?

If you pick a fight with 14 ordinary guys,you get beaten up at the
end,even if
you were Mike Tyson.

And would be judged to be a moron.

Keith




----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---