If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#111
|
|||
|
|||
gun discharge in cockpit.
On Mon, 24 Mar 2008 17:56:49 -0700 (PDT), Dan
wrote: On Mar 24, 8:35 pm, Roger wrote: 3. ALWAYS keep the gun unloaded until ready to use. My wife's is always ready to use. That is whey after sticking my "Ready to use" is meant to be interpreted in context. A concealed carry handgun is loaded because it may be used at any time. Therefore it is being "used" as it is being carried. Whenever you pick up a gun, immediately engage the safety, and, if the And how pray tell do you do this with a model 12 trap gun or Glock 9mm? The Glock safety is a trigger safety, period. The is no manual safety, thus no safety to engage/disengage. So keep your damn finger off the trigger and thereby avoid disengaging the safety. Although considered a safety the problem is it's not a true safety in the sense of preventing an accidental firing. (Unlike the 1911 which blocks the firing pin) If you drop it and something hits the trigger from the front it'll fire and don't go sticking it in your belt.:-)) Bottom line -- only point it at things you don't mind killing. Minding and intending have little to do with each other. If some one broke into our home in the middle of the night I would deeply regret the resutls of my intentions. No kidding. If you haven't worked through the scenarios beforehand, you'll lose. The preps certainly have no compunction about offing you. Best plan is to determine the extent of legal use of deadly force in your jurisdiction and then plan to that contingency. Self defense is the only option in MI. Protection of property is not. At night you only need fear for your life. You are still going to have to explain as does every officer. At least you no longer have to prove you exhausted all avenues of escape. Careful what you shoot at , it may shoot back. Then be fast and accurate. I'm not faster than a ricochet Don't try to lecture me on firearms, Roger. I have more ten times more And where was I doing that? That is one of the problems with Usenet. We reply in first person and it sounds like a lecture. hours on ranges than you have hours in your Deb. I've only seen one AD on a trap range and I've been around a very long time. It went off when the action closed on a semi auto. (don't remember if it was a Remington 1100 or Winchester 1400). Hands were clear of the trigger guard and barrel down range. Could have been a high primer... who knows. Scared the guy with the shotgun more than any one else. There was an AD at the MI State trap shoot one year. Not sure of the details, but the weather IIRC was light rain, the guy with the shot gun closed the action and dropped the thing either when mounting it to his shoulder of closing the action. It went off when it hit the ground. Unfortunately it landed with the barrel pointed to the rear. Fortunately it was in the mud and although it blasted a guy in the back the dirt took up a lot of the power. The only guns I can think of that would pivot like that when closing would be a single or double barrel but as I said, I wasn't there. Now the old Winchester predecessor of the model 12 (don't remember the model number but it had an open hammer) those were notorious for going off when closing the action. They also didn't have a disconnector. Roger (K8RI) Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member) (N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair) www.rogerhalstead.com |
#112
|
|||
|
|||
gun discharge in cockpit.
On Mar 26, 7:56*am, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
"Matt W. Barrow" wrote : "WingFlaps" wrote in message news:4e6254b3-c090-4df5-b316-38ba32bf4272 @d21g2000prf.googlegroups.com... On Mar 25, 11:36 am, "Matt W. Barrow" wrote: On Mar 24, 5:58 pm, Bertie the Bunyip wrote: Dan wrote innews:ebef48ed-3f45-4584-b2c2- What does Dudley have to do with it? Nothing. Matt thinks in his tiny mind that anyone who talks to me is somehow enabling me. It's because he doesn't understand trolling. And you certainly do you demented POS. :: :: Oooh such anger! :: Can you insult me so eloquently too *-pretty please? Pootyhead! Hey, you didn't call me a pootyhead. That's 'cos he doesn't have warm slippery feelings for you. Cheers |
#113
|
|||
|
|||
gun discharge in cockpit.
On Mar 26, 8:01*am, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
WingFlaps wrote in news:05bdb035-545c-445a-b2ad- : On Mar 25, 11:51*am, "JGalban via AviationKB.com" u32749@uwe wrote: Vaughn Simon wrote: * Yet again...politics! * Just for the record, I did not grow up with Dick Cheney :-) * A couple of guys I know did wind up accidentally shooting their friend s on hunting trips. * Evolution in action? Technically, that's natural selection. Right. Wish there was more... Cheers |
#114
|
|||
|
|||
gun discharge in cockpit.
On Mar 26, 1:49 am, Roger wrote:
The Glock safety is a trigger safety, period. The is no manual safety, thus no safety to engage/disengage. So keep your damn finger off the trigger and thereby avoid disengaging the safety. Although considered a safety the problem is it's not a true safety in the sense of preventing an accidental firing. (Unlike the 1911 which blocks the firing pin) If you drop it and something hits the trigger from the front it'll fire and don't go sticking it in your belt.:-)) By "true safety" I suppose you mean a separate switch that blocks the action in some way (There is no safety designed, manufactured, or sold that "prevents accidental firing" -- or at least that had better be your attitude while handling firearms). That's simply defining 'safety" too narrowly. Even the 1911 has a grip safety. The Glock trigger safety has been proven in various field tests and in daily use by the FBI, NYPD, DEA, and about 60% of all Law Enforcement agencies in the US. If you think about it, there's no better place for a safety -- the only time there should be 3-7 lbs of pressure pulling back directly on that trigger is when you want to fire. An no -- it doesn't go off if you drop it, it catches on your belt, etc, etc etc. If it does you're the victim of your own carelessness. Anyone who carries a firearm in their belt without a holster is asking for trouble. Self defense is the only option in MI. Protection of property is not. At night you only need fear for your life. You are still going to have to explain as does every officer. At least you no longer have to prove you exhausted all avenues of escape. You're confirming my statement that you should "determine the extent of legal use of deadly force for your jurisdiction..." And that includes townships. Just because the state law provides some definition of "self defense" doesn't mean your township or city doesn't have more restrictive or more loosely defined laws. Once you've figured out what the rules are, rehearse your actions mentally and from time to time physically ("Should I turn on a light? Use a Flashlight? Stand at the top of the stairs?") so that when you hear something at 3 AM you can act as you planned in your woozy, startled state. The worst thing you can do is follow Uncle Ned's advice to shoot the guy as he runs away and drag him into the house. In nearly all jurisdictions in the United States, an intruder in your house at night warrants the use of deadly force. Also nearly universal is that you can't shoot an old lady who cut you off on the turnpike (Texas is exempt, I think). Bottom line -- learn the law before you have to explain your actions in court. If you own or carry a firearm for self defense, you'd better be prepared to deal with the consequences. Careful what you shoot at , it may shoot back. Then be fast and accurate. I'm not faster than a ricochet Ridiculous. There's not an item in my (and I'm sure your) house that will cause a direct ricochet of the typical expanding self-defense round -- unless you have a huge collection of Battleship steel cuttings hanging on your walls. And where was I doing that? That is one of the problems with Usenet. We reply in first person and it sounds like a lecture. Please forgive my misinterpretation. Dan Mc |
#115
|
|||
|
|||
gun discharge in cockpit.
On Mar 26, 8:32 am, Clark wrote:
As designed the 1911 & 1911A1 do not have firing pin blocks. As far as I know only the Model 80 Colt 1911 has a firing pin block. There may be/probably are other pistols based on the 1911 design that have firing pin blocks but do not count on any 1911 form pistol to have a firing pin block. I think you're right (though the last time I tore down a 1911 was 1990). They are fine pistols, I just can't feel the same attachment so many do (to the point of veneration). Maybe it's due to so many awful, old, worn issue versions I fired. Dan Mc |
#116
|
|||
|
|||
gun discharge in cockpit.
Dan wrote:
Maybe it's due to so many awful, old, worn issue versions I fired. Dan Mc That's probably it. Stop by a local gunshop and check out a Kimber. It is real hard to believe it's the same design. |
#117
|
|||
|
|||
gun discharge in cockpit.
On Mar 26, 10:09 am, Gig 601XL Builder
wrote: Dan wrote: Maybe it's due to so many awful, old, worn issue versions I fired. Dan Mc That's probably it. Stop by a local gunshop and check out a Kimber. It is real hard to believe it's the same design. Those are very nice -- Springfield Armory, Para Ordnace, even Smith & Wesson are in the 1911 game. My personal, totally biased preference is a Sig 229 in 9mm -- lots of rounds, plenty of punch, cheap practice ammo, flawless feed, solid feel, perfect machining, compact size --a really, really nice pistol. The .40 is a decent compromise, but the more I shoot, the more I realize the 9mm cartridge is probably the best overall compromise handgun round. Keep in mind -- a handgun is something you use to fight your way to your long gun. I don't plan on plinking wild drugged up tribesmen, so a 45 just doesn't fit my mission profile. H&Ks are nice, but I don't have much expereince with those. Dan Mc |
#118
|
|||
|
|||
OT gun discharge in cockpit.
I fired it without a recoil pad.
Once. Never again! I've never seen or heard of anyone firing this in any other position than prone, with a bi or tripod and recoil pad. |
#119
|
|||
|
|||
OT gun discharge in cockpit.
On Mar 26, 1:13 pm, "Jon Woellhaf" wrote:
I fired it without a recoil pad. Once. Never again! I've never seen or heard of anyone firing this in any other position than prone, with a bi or tripod and recoil pad. Can I ask.. what were you thinking??!?!? Or was there a girl watching? ;-) |
#120
|
|||
|
|||
OT gun discharge in cockpit.
Dan wrote:
On Mar 26, 1:13 pm, "Jon Woellhaf" wrote: I fired it without a recoil pad. Once. Never again! I've never seen or heard of anyone firing this in any other position than prone, with a bi or tripod and recoil pad. Can I ask.. what were you thinking??!?!? No kidding. Are you able to use your arm yet. The Semi-Auto version isn't near as bad. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Static Discharge | gman | Piloting | 12 | March 24th 07 07:56 PM |
IFR static discharge | [email protected] | Home Built | 0 | April 2nd 06 08:06 PM |
The Vanishing Honorable Discharge | Otis Willie | Naval Aviation | 0 | October 29th 04 02:58 AM |