![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#111
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Matt Whiting writes:
Chris Colohan wrote: Another data point -- I am not nearly as experienced as you are, but going through every item on the Citabria checklist takes me 20-30 minutes. Wow, you've got to get out of 1st gear. :-) I could preflight my 182, wash the windshield, change the oil and check the tire pressures in 10 minutes time. I didn't realize a Citabria was so complex. Does the preflight require ultrasonic inspection of the structure or some such? :-) I admit I am new to this, and I could probably go faster with experience. But I attribute most of this time to checking everything that can be seen, touched, or smelled that I can get my hands, eyes, or nose on. The plane I fly is kind of old and creaky -- and I am paranoid enough to check everything that reasonably can be checked without tools. Sometimes I find myself falling into habit, and doing a check quickly -- when I notice this, I force myself to slow down and do the check again purposefully. Sometimes I notice things on the second time which my eyes skimmed over on the first check. My instructor also provided a 10-page checklist for me to use on the preflight. Perhaps this is more detailed than average? (My instructor claims that the checklist started off much shorter, but grew every time something went wrong over his many years of flying Citabrias...) One other data point -- about half of the time I fly the Citabria I find a minor problem (not major enough to affect airworthiness, but worth fixing: screw missing on a wing root fairing, underinflated tire, slightly low on oil, etc.) This plane is based at a busy club, and many other pilots fly the plane in between my flying sessions. I take this as a good sign -- my preflight technique is noticing problems which other pilots are missing, before they become more major problems. (Alternative explanations: 1. all of these minor problem occurred right before I want to go flying; 2. other pilots noticed these problems but didn't think they were worth writing them down as squawks.) Chris -- Chris Colohan Email: PGP: finger Web: www.colohan.com Phone: (412)268-4751 |
#112
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Chris Colohan wrote:
Matt Whiting writes: Chris Colohan wrote: Another data point -- I am not nearly as experienced as you are, but going through every item on the Citabria checklist takes me 20-30 minutes. Wow, you've got to get out of 1st gear. :-) I could preflight my 182, wash the windshield, change the oil and check the tire pressures in 10 minutes time. I didn't realize a Citabria was so complex. Does the preflight require ultrasonic inspection of the structure or some such? :-) I admit I am new to this, and I could probably go faster with experience. But I attribute most of this time to checking everything that can be seen, touched, or smelled that I can get my hands, eyes, or nose on. The plane I fly is kind of old and creaky -- and I am paranoid enough to check everything that reasonably can be checked without tools. Sometimes I find myself falling into habit, and doing a check quickly -- when I notice this, I force myself to slow down and do the check again purposefully. Sometimes I notice things on the second time which my eyes skimmed over on the first check. My instructor also provided a 10-page checklist for me to use on the preflight. Perhaps this is more detailed than average? (My instructor claims that the checklist started off much shorter, but grew every time something went wrong over his many years of flying Citabrias...) A 10 page preflight checklist is simply ridiculous. All of the checklists for my Skylane, including the emergency ones that I made up myself since Cessna didn't provide much of any, were less than 10 pages. Matt |
#113
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
well.....just food for thought all of the major cell phone carriers sell a
program that can be downloaded to many phones that has TFR's as well as full weather its called Pilot My-cast https://secure.my-cast.com/pilot.jsp Dave Zera Co-Chariman Safety / Flight Line AirVenture 2006 "Bob Fry" wrote in message ... "JD" == John Doe writes: JD I had my first experience with a VIP TFR last weekend. Bush JD was in town and I had gotten an email from AOPA notifying me JD of the TFR in my area. Bush was in Sacto a few weeks ago and I too got the AOPA notification by email. Because of that, and checking the extent of that TFR, I decided not to risk it and simply didn't fly that weekend. But for the TFR I violated, I didn't get a notice from AOPA. Why, I'm not sure. And the local newspaper had nothing about Cheney's visit until afterwards so I didn't know he was in town. JD Luckily, I've learned to check NOTAMS prior to every flight, JD and following the procedures, the TFR didn't delay me at all JD in getting on my way. I rarely check NOTAMS or get a briefing for local VFR flights, and quite honestly I doubt I'll change my habits. The FAA should recognize that using NOTAMs alone are not enough. Maybe they should take email addresses and locations from pilots (kinda like AOPA) and send notices when a TFR is going to pop up in a given area. Maybe they could reserve a frequency just to broadcast important area NOTAMs. Pilots would get in the habit of checking it before takeoff and during flight. Maybe area NOTAMs could be added on to AWOS broadcasts. Something? |
#114
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
David J. Zera wrote:
well.....just food for thought all of the major cell phone carriers sell a program that can be downloaded to many phones that has TFR's as well as full weather its called Pilot My-cast https://secure.my-cast.com/pilot.jsp Looks pretty good except it works for every phone known to man except the one I JUST got two weeks ago. I'n stuck with it for two years, too. Damn. -- Mortimer Schnerd, RN VE |
#115
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 09 Jul 2006 00:59:47 GMT, "Mortimer Schnerd, RN"
wrote: David J. Zera wrote: well.....just food for thought all of the major cell phone carriers sell a program that can be downloaded to many phones that has TFR's as well as full weather its called Pilot My-cast https://secure.my-cast.com/pilot.jsp Looks pretty good except it works for every phone known to man except the one I JUST got two weeks ago. I'n stuck with it for two years, too. It works with my phone, but I'd have to change providers to use it with that phone which doesn't make sense. Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member) (N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair) www.rogerhalstead.com Damn. Roger |
#116
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Nice idea, but doesn't work with my phone.
I still haven't got the letter from the FAA detailing my punishment, but after talking to the FSDO a few times I know what to expect: - 30 day license suspension for violating the TFR, NASA ASRS form doesn't work to suspend penalty - Another 15 days added by local FSDO for failing to get complete information before flight; actually serving the penalty is waived by ASRS Other things I learned, most from AOPA's web site: - When asked to return a phone call, whether the tower, ATC, or the FAA, a pilot is under absolutely no legal requirement to do so. - And in fact you're often better off not to call back. Even the FSDO guy admitted that they lessen their add-on penalty if they're not sure they have the right person. In other words, being stand-up and not concealing anything simply makes you an easy target and a chump. I would probably call back for a tower or class C controller, but probably won't for anything else in the future. - If you decide to call for a briefing before every flight, you can ask for just NOTAMs and TFRs. However this may not protect you from the add-on penalty for not getting complete info before flight. - FSS briefers can and do fail to report vital information, most often if it's out of their region. Two local pilots, after hearing about me, related tales of neglected information (a safety TFR and a malfunctioning VOR) that would be pretty important to flight safety. They knew about these only by chance, and when they asked the FSS briefer about them, the response they got was "Oh yea, thanks for reminding me!" (TFR) and "Oh, does anybody use VORs anymore?" But at least you'll be on record and your legal butt will be safe, if not your physical butt. More when I get the letter....sometime. |
#117
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mortimer,
The list that Digital cyclone keeps on supported phone is really out of date. depending on your carrier access the download pages on the phone's web. My sprint phone (mm9000) is not listed on the supported pages BUT it is supported and downloadable from Sprint's site. I believe that you will find that you can download and use it! Dave Zera Co-Chariman Safety / Flight line AirVenture 2006 "Mortimer Schnerd, RN" wrote in message ... David J. Zera wrote: well.....just food for thought all of the major cell phone carriers sell a program that can be downloaded to many phones that has TFR's as well as full weather its called Pilot My-cast https://secure.my-cast.com/pilot.jsp Looks pretty good except it works for every phone known to man except the one I JUST got two weeks ago. I'n stuck with it for two years, too. Damn. -- Mortimer Schnerd, RN VE |
#118
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bob Fry wrote:
- FSS briefers can and do fail to report vital information, most often if it's out of their region. Two local pilots, after hearing about me, related tales of neglected information (a safety TFR and a malfunctioning VOR) that would be pretty important to flight safety. They knew about these only by chance, and when they asked the FSS briefer about them, the response they got was "Oh yea, thanks for reminding me!" (TFR) and "Oh, does anybody use VORs anymore?" But at least you'll be on record and your legal butt will be safe, if not your physical butt. I discovered a wonderful example of that recently. R-5206 is about 15 miles from White Plains (HPN). It's active mostly in July and August, but "O/T by NOTAM", and it does indeed get activated from time to time year round. You would think calling FSS and asking for a "notams in a 25 mile radius around HPN" would get you the information that R-5206 was hot, right? WRONG! It turns out, that R-5206's notams are filed under IGN (Kingston VOR), and IGN is more than 25 miles from HPN, so the notam doesn't show up in the 25-mile briefing. What idiocy! I've been flying in the area for 10 years and only found this out a couple of months ago, pretty much by accident. I asked a student of mine to give me the highlights of his briefing. I knew 5206 was hot because I saw the notam (I typically ask duats for a 50-mile radius, and IGN falls within that). He gave me a complete weather rundown, but didn't mention the notam. I asked him about 5206, and he said the briefer didn't say anything about it. At this point, I started to suspect he hadn't really gotten a briefing, so I made him get another one, and put it on speaker while I listened. He did, and sure enough, the briefer said nothing about 5206. Before he hung up, I asked specifically about 5206 and got the notam telling us it was hot. It wasn't until sometime later that I put two and two together and figured out the IGN bit. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Busted TFR, what to expect? | bob | General Aviation | 98 | July 9th 06 04:00 PM |
CAP SAREX what to expect? | Robert M. Gary | Piloting | 8 | August 22nd 05 02:16 PM |
Class B busted...My problem or the controller's ? | Antoņio | Piloting | 130 | June 4th 05 02:59 PM |
IFR to & from CLT - Delays and Fees to Expect | David | Instrument Flight Rules | 6 | August 21st 04 04:57 AM |
Busted IFR Checkride | Jon Kraus | Instrument Flight Rules | 77 | May 4th 04 02:31 PM |