Nuther SR-22 crash/incident?

"Matt Whiting" wrote in message
...
Please don't ascribe Peter's sense of personal responsibility (or lack
thereof) to all Americans. That couldn't be farther from the truth.

Please don't ascribe Thomas' perception of my sense of personal
responsibility to me. It couldn't be farther from the truth.

(Matt Whiting wrote)
That would be "you're" welcome as in "you are" welcome. Correctly
someone's English is always dangerous as you almost always make a mistake
of your own in the process. The preceeding contains "your" used
correctly.

P.S. I'm sure someone better in English than me can find at least one
mistake in what I wrote above. :-)


All procedes from the preceeding post will go to the National Spelling Bee.


Montblack

"Matt Whiting" wrote

That would be "you're" welcome as in "you are" welcome. Correctly
someone's English is always dangerous as you almost always make a mistake
of your own in the process. The preceeding contains "your"
used correctly.

That was also a joke. See the g ???

Try to keep up.
--
Jim in NC

Peter Duniho wrote:
"Matt Whiting" wrote in message
...

Please don't ascribe Peter's sense of personal responsibility (or lack
thereof) to all Americans. That couldn't be farther from the truth.


Please don't ascribe Thomas' perception of my sense of personal
responsibility to me. It couldn't be farther from the truth.

Not so. You clearly wrote that a pilot who was using the brakes
incorrectly wasn't completely to blame for wearing out the brakes and
the maker of the airplane should bear some of the blame. I disagree
completely. That is the attitude that Thomas was ascribing to all
Americans and I am an American and I don't share that attitude at all.
If there is a correct means provided by the manufacturer to use the
brakes, and the pilot isn't using that method, then the pilot is 100% to
blame.

Matt

Morgans wrote:

"Matt Whiting" wrote


That would be "you're" welcome as in "you are" welcome. Correctly
someone's English is always dangerous as you almost always make a mistake
of your own in the process. The preceeding contains "your"
used correctly.


That was also a joke. See the g ???

Try to keep up.

As was mine. Did you see the smiley? Try to keep up.

Matt

"Matt Whiting" wrote in message
...
Please don't ascribe Thomas' perception of my sense of personal
responsibility to me. It couldn't be farther from the truth.

Not so.

Yes so.

You clearly wrote that a pilot who was using the brakes incorrectly wasn't
completely to blame for wearing out the brakes and the maker of the
airplane should bear some of the blame.

So what? What does that have to do with the question of liability lawsuits
and a sense of personal responsibility?

I disagree completely.

Yes, of course you do.

That is the attitude that Thomas was ascribing to all Americans and I am
an American and I don't share that attitude at all.

The problem here is that the "attitude" that you're making ignorant
generalizations about has nothing to do with what I wrote. This thread had
nothing to do with "liberals" or "conservatives" until you stuck your "take
any chance to bash the other side" nose into it.

If there is a correct means provided by the manufacturer to use the
brakes, and the pilot isn't using that method, then the pilot is 100% to
blame.

I refer you to my question to Thomas about the satisfactory nature of the
Wright Flyer for the personal aircraft market (which he conveniently
ignored).

You've started yourself down a slipperly slope, and the logical conclusion
of your black & white view is ridiculous.

Pete

"Matt Whiting" wrote

As was mine. Did you see the smiley? Try to keep up.

Nice attempt at a save, but I'm not buying it. The smiley was in your P.S.,
after you make a joke about someone else finding a problem in you post.
--
Jim in NC

Morgans wrote:
"Matt Whiting" wrote

As was mine. Did you see the smiley? Try to keep up.


Nice attempt at a save, but I'm not buying it. The smiley was in your P.S.,
after you make a joke about someone else finding a problem in you post.

That's OK as I wasn't selling anything.

Matt

Morgans,

The things that stop cars and airplanes are called brakes, not breaks.


Sorry, that one got mixed up. Now, gimme a brake, will ya? g

--
Thomas Borchert (EDDH)

Peter,


You see a connection that does not exist.

Again: We disagree on that. And that's ok, for me. Apparently, it's not for you
(see below). Tough luck.

You may recall the lawsuit against the maker of vacuum pumps after the crash of
an airplane. Same thing as your brake theory: The inherent design...

Uh...you are really a piece of work. You opened the personal invectives
with a direct accusation of my "American attitude",

I didn't realize that saying "that's a very American way of looking at it" is
an accusation or a personal insult. If so, I apologize - while being amazed.

Hope you don't think anyone can take you seriously.

Who's the piece of work now? Get used to the fact that there are ways to see
things beyond yours. Oh, and you are indeed representing yourself quite nicely
here.

--
Thomas Borchert (EDDH)