If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#131
|
|||
|
|||
"sleepy6" wrote in message ... You forget....If you make an accusation, you have the responsibility of proving it. I did. I told him what he has to do to prove me wrong. That was... what... 2-3 weeks ago? For the record, I've never had a truck at SnF. =8) Looks like Chuck explained it pretty well in his post even though he had no obligation to explain anything. The current truck was bought after the latest Sun N Fun. Titles to previous trucks went with the trucks when they were sold. Oh, of course, how could I forget that private parties and corporations don't keep records of vehicles they used to own? chuckle If you believe that you're more gullible than the rest of the RAH gaggle combined. Others have posted that Chucks trucks were there along with the CGS trailer and Chucks personal plane. No, others have posted that they saw those things, not one of them knows who owns them. All he has to do is post a simple title (copy of which I'm sure he has on file or can obtain in a few minutes with one phone call) and evidence that the vehicle was at SnF. It's not your job. It's his, so I'll be saying so long to this little sideshow thread of yours... Juan |
#132
|
|||
|
|||
In article liHlb.3725$e01.10447@attbi_s02, Juan.Jimenez says...
Better than proving that you are the Pathological Liar of Cleveland. Wrong again jaun I don't live in Cleveland haven't for about 33 years .Boy your just a font of wrong info. |
#133
|
|||
|
|||
Juan,
Excuse me, but where I come from, if you make the accusations, you have to supply the proof..... Red "Juan.Jimenez" wrote in message news:ICHlb.2908$Fm2.5495@attbi_s04... "sleepy6" wrote in message ... You forget....If you make an accusation, you have the responsibility of proving it. I did. I told him what he has to do to prove me wrong. That was... what... 2-3 weeks ago? For the record, I've never had a truck at SnF. =8) Looks like Chuck explained it pretty well in his post even though he had no obligation to explain anything. The current truck was bought after the latest Sun N Fun. Titles to previous trucks went with the trucks when they were sold. Oh, of course, how could I forget that private parties and corporations don't keep records of vehicles they used to own? chuckle If you believe that you're more gullible than the rest of the RAH gaggle combined. Others have posted that Chucks trucks were there along with the CGS trailer and Chucks personal plane. No, others have posted that they saw those things, not one of them knows who owns them. All he has to do is post a simple title (copy of which I'm sure he has on file or can obtain in a few minutes with one phone call) and evidence that the vehicle was at SnF. It's not your job. It's his, so I'll be saying so long to this little sideshow thread of yours... Juan |
#134
|
|||
|
|||
From: "Juan.Jimenez"
Date: 10/22/2003 9:48 PM Central Daylight Time Message-id: CjHlb.3733$e01.11248@attbi_s02 "ChuckSlusarczyk" wrote in message ... Funny you should say that but that's just what I'm doing. jaun laid a big egg by they way by attributing some none existent family members to me and his reference to Juvenile court. He's been very careful up to now but he crossed the line. What line, the court line? ROFL! Juan, I have no dog in this fight, but bringing up family members, real or imagionary, in such a manner as to imply negative things about them is immature, unfair and is usually resorted to by someone who can't prove his case. At the very least it is demeaning to you and everyone else concerned. I suggest an apology is in order. Dan, U. S. Air Force, retired |
#135
|
|||
|
|||
|
#136
|
|||
|
|||
On Thu, 23 Oct 2003 02:50:06 GMT, "Juan.Jimenez"
wrote: "ChuckSlusarczyk" wrote in message ... Ousterhout got??? Somehow you don't seem the type to strike fear into the hearts of anyone let alone Ousterhout. So check Google. There was no response from him after I set him straight. Juan, my lack of response means only that I'm not responding to you -- a tactic which I believe eveyone should use. - J.O.- |
#137
|
|||
|
|||
In article , John Ousterhout
writes: Ousterhout got??? Somehow you don't seem the type to strike fear into the hearts of anyone let alone Ousterhout. So check Google. There was no response from him after I set him straight. Juan, my lack of response means only that I'm not responding to you -- a tactic which I believe eveyone should use. - J.O.- John, I am SHOCKED! I just knew you were hiding in the closet somewhere shaking in fear of Jaun! Gawd, what a funny picture! (Not of you in a closet, you kicking Jaun's ass!) Bob Reed www.kisbuild.r-a-reed-assoc.com (KIS Builders Site) KIS Cruiser in progress...Slow but steady progress.... "Ladies and Gentlemen, take my advice, pull down your pants and Slide on the Ice!" (M.A.S.H. Sidney Freedman) |
#138
|
|||
|
|||
In article , andy asberry
writes: You're lying again. How pathetic to watch a grown man lying and squirming like a little kid caught with his hand in the cookie jar. Does your therapist know about this behaviour of yours? http://groups.google.com/groups?selm...uy.com&oe=UTF- 8&output=gplain One Juan Jimenez, a self-proclaimed aviation writer, has publicly stated that the proprietor of an airplane manufacturing company has lied AGAIN. That indicates at least two lies. A pattern, a habitual liar. As a consumer who is contemplating the purchase of an airplane of the type manufactured by the said proprietor, I certainly don't want to get involved with a habitual liar. Therefore, I won't consider buying from him. Of course, if Mr. Jimenez is wrong or has lied himself, I would think the manufacturer would be entitled to compensation for lost revenue and damaged reputation. But Jaun's lawyer would argue that since Jaun is a total idiot and the only one who believes that he is a writer of any kind, how could anyone be damaged by something he said. Think about it...anyone stupid enough to believe anything that Jaun would say is really way too stupid to be flying anything. Bob Reed www.kisbuild.r-a-reed-assoc.com (KIS Builders Site) KIS Cruiser in progress...Slow but steady progress.... "Ladies and Gentlemen, take my advice, pull down your pants and Slide on the Ice!" (M.A.S.H. Sidney Freedman) |
#139
|
|||
|
|||
"sleepy6" wrote in message
... You forget....If you make an accusation, you have the responsibility of proving it. I did. I told him what he has to do to prove me wrong. That was... wha t... 2-3 weeks ago? Lets see if I understand this....You accuse Chuck of not bringing his truck or other items that he owns to Sun N Fun because someone might make a legal attempt to grab it. Lots of folks see Chuck there with his truck, trailer and airplane so now you claim Chuck doesn't own them? Hey Chuck, who is this friend that keeps loaning you stuff for years at a time? Will he loan me a Hawk like yours? I'll settle for the use of a new truck for a couple of years For the record, I've never had a truck at SnF. =8) An attempt at humor or are you just confused agian? Looks like Chuck explained it pretty well in his post even though he had no obligation to explain anything. The current truck was bought after the latest Sun N Fun. Titles to previous trucks went with the trucks when they were sold. Oh, of course, how could I forget that private parties and corporation s don't keep records of vehicles they used to own? chuckle If you bel ieve that you're more gullible than the rest of the RAH gaggle combined. Well lets see, I privately have owned numerous vehicles over the last 45 years and I have no proof at all of any but the ones I currently drive. When I traded the others in I had to give up the titles, nobody gave me any paperwork that proved I once owned them and nothing requires me to keep any such proof. My company currently has 4 trucks but over the years we have owned a bunch. They show up on the old inventories and the old depreciation sheets for tax purposes but the titles went with the trucks when the trucks left. What state lets you keep the title for a vehicle that you sold and why would you keep that title if you could? Have you ever sold or traded in a vehicle? Others have posted that Chucks trucks were there along with the CGS trailer and Chucks personal plane. No, others have posted that they saw those things, not one of them kno ws who owns them. He either owns the stuff or he has great friends that loan him stuff for years at a time Your job would be to prove that he doesn't own them to prove your accusation. If you could furnish that proof and then people might take you serious. All he has to do is post a simple title (copy of which I'm sure he has on file or can obtain in a few minutes with one phone call) and evidence that the vehicle was at SnF. It's not your job. It's his, so I'll be saying so long to this little sideshow thread of yours... Juan Thats where you are confused. It's your job to prove what you claim and once agian all you do is spout the same nonsense and no proof. I am giving you the perfect chance to prove your accusation and really embarass Chuck. All you have to do is post proof that Chuck has a reason to avoid taking his stuff to Sun N Fun. Looks to me like Chuck makes the trip every year with his stuff and nothing has stopped him from taking it back home. BTW The inuendos about some females (who apparently exist only in your imagination since you never posted anything to prove otherwise) are entirely out of place. It appears like you have no proof of any of your wild claims so you just resort to insults and even wilder inuendos about his family. This certainly did not give you any credibility so your credibility still stands at zero. Right now it looks like you are a pathetic little worm who is jealous of Chucks success. BS doesn't cut it. Show us something to back up your accusations or crawl back in your hole. |
#140
|
|||
|
|||
In article ,
sleepy6 says... Well lets see, I privately have owned numerous vehicles over the last 45 years and I have no proof at all of any but the ones I currently drive. When I traded the others in I had to give up the titles, nobody gave me any paperwork that proved I once owned them and nothing requires me to keep any such proof. My company currently has 4 trucks but over the years we have owned a bunch. They show up on the old inventories and the old depreciation sheets for tax purposes but the titles went with the trucks when the trucks left. Hey Bob he knows that,that's why he says what he does. He wants me to prove the impossible .I have no titles any more for my red Dodge Ram or my Blue one which I traded in a couple weeks ago.So he bravely states he wants to see the titles from the trucks I took to SnF. What state lets you keep the title for a vehicle that you sold and why would you keep that title if you could? Have you ever sold or traded in a vehicle? From the sound of it if he can't afford to put a few bucks down to prove he's right I doubt he ever bought a new truck let alone 3 in 6 years .If he had he be aware of how titles work. He either owns the stuff or he has great friends that loan him stuff for years at a time Your job would be to prove that he doesn't own them to prove your accusation. If you could furnish that proof and then people might take you serious. Hey Bob I got a lot of great friends but I ain't got any that will loan me a new truck every few years no questions asked LOL!! Let alone an airplane or a 30 ' trailer etc. Wonder if I could get those friends to pay for my booth at SnF this year :-) Thats where you are confused. It's your job to prove what you claim and once agian all you do is spout the same nonsense and no proof. I am giving you the perfect chance to prove your accusation and really embarass Chuck. All you have to do is post proof that Chuck has a reason to avoid taking his stuff to Sun N Fun. Looks to me like Chuck makes the trip every year with his stuff and nothing has stopped him from taking it back home. ....and I'll be there again next year and guess who won't be ? zoom won't be there again. LOL!!! BTW The inuendos about some females (who apparently exist only in your imagination since you never posted anything to prove otherwise) are entirely out of place. I suppose if I did a criminal record search of all the jiminezes I'd probably come up with a ton of names and I would also bet a lot of them are named jaun as well. So I if I were use jauns logic against him as he does me I could say what's the criminal charges your hiding? He's a real joke. It appears like you have no proof of any of your wild claims so you just resort to insults and even wilder inuendos about his family. This certainly did not give you any credibility so your credibility still stands at zero. Right now it looks like you are a pathetic little worm who is jealous of Chucks success. BS doesn't cut it. Show us something to back up your accusations or crawl back in your hole. Your right I think envy is at the bottom of most of this .It would seem both jaun and zoom have never got any bonified recognition for any achievements in aviation so they try to ride on the coat tails of those who have. Either by sucking up to them or attacking them. It gives meaning to their otherwise lack luster lives. See ya Chuck |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
what's a good country for a homebuilt aircraft? | Lukas | Home Built | 17 | September 25th 03 06:53 PM |
bulding a kitplane maybe Van's RV9A --- a good idea ????? | Flightdeck | Home Built | 10 | September 9th 03 07:20 PM |
A Good Story | Badwater Bill | Home Built | 15 | September 3rd 03 03:00 PM |
Good degreaser? | Michael Horowitz | Home Built | 15 | July 17th 03 05:49 PM |
War Stories: Good degreaser? | B2431 | Home Built | 1 | July 16th 03 03:18 PM |