If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#141
|
|||
|
|||
Aerodynamics of Towing
On 17 Mar, 16:16, Darryl Ramm wrote:
Gravitational potential energy gained by soaring (climbing in lift) or by winching/towing/motorglider engine is the power source for gliding flight. So what's the power source when climbing in a thermal, when gravitational potential enegry is decreasing? If you take a 500m launch, you have 4,905kJ/kgof potential energy to play with - no more and no less. As we all know, that's about enough energy to keep a glider flying for ten minutes or so. For flights of any longer, another power source is needed, and though gravitational potential may be used as a store from time to time, it is only the store, not the source. Ian |
#142
|
|||
|
|||
Aerodynamics of Towing
On 17 Mar, 17:30, Bob Cook wrote:
I don't like your use of the word power below however. *Force, energy and power are not the same. *People often confuse them. Mind you, it's amazing how many people think the power source for soaring flight is gravity. I don't. I used "power" because I meant "power"! Ian |
#143
|
|||
|
|||
Aerodynamics of Towing
Darryl Ramm wrote:
On Mar 17, 8:53 am, The Real Doctor wrote: On 17 Mar, 12:30, Bob Cook wrote: OK, all this talk about the aerodynamics of towing brings me to something about the aerodynamics of gliding! The following question came up at a recent club meeting. I believe the question was originally on the Bronze Badge Exam. Q) What force provides the forward motion necessary to move a glider through the air? a) lift b) centripetal force c) gravity I contend that it is a flawed question, and that none of the choices for answers are (completly) correct! It's a flawed question because, as Newton pointed out, NO force is required for steady motion. Mind you, it's amazing how many people think the power source for soaring flight is gravity. Ian No force? Newton's first law tells you that for constant velocity the forward component of lift must match the drag (or the glider would accelerate or decelerate, and if so then the second law tells you how much). There is drag force so a forward force is required to counter that or the glider would decelerate, and something has to overcome that force. And that is the forward component of lift. Answer (a) is clearly the best answer and this question as is I think is a suitable test of a basic understanding of what is going on. Gravitational potential energy gained by soaring (climbing in lift) or by winching/towing/motorglider engine is the power source for gliding flight. Thankfully we have several ways to charge that power source. Darryl Yebbut...imagine a glider magically inserted into earth's atmosphere after global warming has removed all grabbity. What gets it moving? Bob - going to gather my chicken's eggs, now - W. |
#144
|
|||
|
|||
Aerodynamics of Towing
All of the energy to maintain a glider in steady flight through still
air is derived from gravity - there is no other source of energy. Potential energy of the glider is converted to kinetic energy in the form of forward motion in order to overcome drag. In a 1000 lb sailplane with a 40:1 glide, the wings will develop about 25 lbs of forward thrust to overcome drag and about 1,000.3 lbs of total lift. The glide angle is about 1.5 degrees. I don't understand why people have a problem understanding this - it's a very similar problem to a ball rolling down an inclined plane. Just basic physics! Mike |
#145
|
|||
|
|||
Aerodynamics of Towing
On Mar 17, 11:13*am, The Real Doctor
wrote: On 17 Mar, 16:16, Darryl Ramm wrote: Gravitational potential energy gained by soaring (climbing in lift) or by winching/towing/motorglider engine is the power source for gliding flight. So what's the power source when climbing in a thermal, when gravitational potential enegry is decreasing? If you take a 500m launch, you have 4,905kJ/kgof potential energy to play with - no more and no less. As we all know, that's about enough energy to keep a glider flying for ten minutes or so. For flights of any longer, another power source is needed, and though gravitational potential may be used as a store from time to time, it is only the store, not the source. Ian Say what? Gravitational potential energy *increases* not decreases as the glider climbs. And that "store" is the transfer mechanism that allows the glider to glide. There is no other mechanism. With no gravity, even with an atmosphere (which would be difficult to arrange), your glider could not glide. Even if you could arrange to launch the glider with some airspeed drag would eventually slow it down to a dead stop. Any air currents would move the glider around but you would not be able to soar/glider based on those. (OK some forms of dynamic soaring might be possible). When you are climbing in a thermal the source of power (or increase in energy, if you prefer but power is a perfectly correct term) is the force of the raising airmass lifting the glider against gravitational pull. The energy gained is just the difference in gravitational potential energy between the different altitudes, the average power spent doing this is that difference in potential energy divided by the time to climb. Yes the force to deliver that energy/power came from somewhere i.e. the glider had a tiny but real effect on the raising air mass. Want some ball park numbers? A 400kg (880 pounds) glider climbing in a strong thermal at 5 meters per second (~ 10 knots). Is gaining energy at a rate = g * M * v ~ 9.8 m/s2 * 400 kg * 5 m/s = 19 kW or 26 horsepower. Guy's this has wandered into junior-high school level physics. Time to either let Bob's chickens' contribute to this thread or let it die. Darryl |
#146
|
|||
|
|||
Aerodynamics of Towing
In message
, The Real Doctor writes On 17 Mar, 12:30, Bob Cook wrote: OK, all this talk about the aerodynamics of towing brings me to something about the aerodynamics of gliding! The following question came up at a recent club meeting. *I believe the question was originally on the Bronze Badge Exam. Q) What force provides the forward motion necessary to move a glider through the air? a) lift b) centripetal force c) gravity I contend that it is a flawed question, and that none of the choices for answers are (completly) correct! It's a flawed question because, as Newton pointed out, NO force is required for steady motion. Mind you, it's amazing how many people think the power source for soaring flight is gravity. Ian If gravity isn't acting why does the glider need to produce lift with it's wings? -- Surfer! Email to: ramwater at uk2 dot net |
#147
|
|||
|
|||
Aerodynamics of Towing
Indeed this has degraded into junior high physics and if I remember
most junior high students got poor grades in physics.... I think I'll pull out the chickens... If Bob's chicken is sliding down a hill.. what force causes it to continue sliding? It is gravity. There is no forward component of lift that contributes to forward motion. By definition lift is perpendicular to the direction of motion and drag is parallel. How can lift make anything move forward if it acts perpendicular to the line of motion? In steady state gliding flight, Net Lift is equal to Weight times the cosine of the gliding angle. This value will "always" be less than weight. Please don't try to sound smart and point out the obvious answer that if the angle is zero, lift equals weight. True, but then it fails to satisfy the condition: Steady state gliding flight. As for the thread that this originally morphed into. Why does my glider handle so poorly when being pulled slowly on tow? The answer lies in the dynamics of the tow. It's not obvious when the towing force is steady state. The clue is in how the glider behaves when the tow force is changing because of gusts and the fact that you are trying to maintain position behind the towplane during a climb. The wing will see a greater variation in angle of attack as a function of changes in rope tension at low airspeed than it does at higher speed. Combining this effect with low dynamic pressure results in reduced aileron effectiveness and therefore poor handling. -Kevin |
#148
|
|||
|
|||
Aerodynamics of Towing
On Mar 17, 2:41*pm, KevinFinke wrote:
Indeed this has degraded into junior high physics and if I remember most junior high students got poor grades in physics.... I think I'll pull out the chickens... If Bob's chicken is sliding down a hill.. what force causes it to continue sliding? It is gravity. There is no forward component of lift that contributes to forward motion. By definition lift is perpendicular to the direction of motion and drag is parallel. How can lift make anything move forward if it acts perpendicular to the line of motion? In steady state gliding flight, Net Lift is equal to Weight times the cosine of the gliding angle. This value will "always" be less than weight. Please don't try to sound smart and point out the obvious answer that if the angle is zero, lift equals weight. True, but then it fails to satisfy the condition: Steady state gliding flight. As for the thread that this originally morphed into. Why does my glider handle so poorly when being pulled slowly on tow? The answer lies in the dynamics of the tow. It's not obvious when the towing force is steady state. The clue is in how the glider behaves when the tow force is changing because of gusts and the fact that you are trying to maintain position behind the towplane during a climb. The wing will see a greater variation in angle of attack as a function of changes in rope tension at low airspeed than it does at higher speed. Combining this effect with low dynamic pressure results in reduced aileron effectiveness and therefore poor handling. -Kevin Sorry back to the hen house for you. Lift is *not* perpendicular to the direction of motion. Lift is perpendicular to the airflow. That small difference is going to get you in trouble in these arguments. The chicken sliding down the hill is propelled forward by the component of the force pushing up on it from the sloped surface in response to gravity pushing it down onto that surface. Gravity operates vertically down through the center of mass and without that sloping surface the chicken would not move forward. There is a component of this force vector pushing forward and the chicken moves forward down the slope. This is exactly analogous to the lift vector pointed forward on the glider and the forward component of that vector providing the force to overcome drag in forward flight. Gravity operates on the glider though it's center of mass, without that lift vector pointed forward the glider would not (continue to) move forward. Gravity, without the thrust vector leaning forward, does not explain how a glider glides through the air, however Gravity is what provides the power/energy to do this (or store for that energy if you prefer). The above discussion applies equally to chickens and African or European swallows. However I actually think you are onto a good line of reasoning about the on-tow issue. Darryl |
#149
|
|||
|
|||
Aerodynamics of Towing
Jim White had it right, way back several weeks ago. What makes it work is
MAGIC. At 22:41 17 March 2009, Darryl Ramm wrote: On Mar 17, 2:41=A0pm, KevinFinke wrote: Indeed this has degraded into junior high physics and if I remember most junior high students got poor grades in physics.... I think I'll pull out the chickens... If Bob's chicken is sliding down a hill.. what force causes it to continue sliding? It is gravity. There is no forward component of lift that contributes to forward motion. By definition lift is perpendicular to the direction of motion and drag is parallel. How can lift make anything move forward if it acts perpendicular to the line of motion? In steady state gliding flight, Net Lift is equal to Weight times the cosine of the gliding angle. This value will "always" be less than weight. Please don't try to sound smart and point out the obvious answer that if the angle is zero, lift equals weight. True, but then it fails to satisfy the condition: Steady state gliding flight. As for the thread that this originally morphed into. Why does my glider handle so poorly when being pulled slowly on tow? The answer lies in the dynamics of the tow. It's not obvious when the towing force is steady state. The clue is in how the glider behaves when the tow force is changing because of gusts and the fact that you are trying to maintain position behind the towplane during a climb. The wing will see a greater variation in angle of attack as a function of changes in rope tension at low airspeed than it does at higher speed. Combining this effect with low dynamic pressure results in reduced aileron effectiveness and therefore poor handling. -Kevin Sorry back to the hen house for you. Lift is *not* perpendicular to the direction of motion. Lift is perpendicular to the airflow. That small difference is going to get you in trouble in these arguments. The chicken sliding down the hill is propelled forward by the component of the force pushing up on it from the sloped surface in response to gravity pushing it down onto that surface. Gravity operates vertically down through the center of mass and without that sloping surface the chicken would not move forward. There is a component of this force vector pushing forward and the chicken moves forward down the slope. This is exactly analogous to the lift vector pointed forward on the glider and the forward component of that vector providing the force to overcome drag in forward flight. Gravity operates on the glider though it's center of mass, without that lift vector pointed forward the glider would not (continue to) move forward. Gravity, without the thrust vector leaning forward, does not explain how a glider glides through the air, however Gravity is what provides the power/energy to do this (or store for that energy if you prefer). The above discussion applies equally to chickens and African or European swallows. However I actually think you are onto a good line of reasoning about the on-tow issue. Darryl |
#150
|
|||
|
|||
Aerodynamics of Towing
At 18:16 17 March 2009, The Real Doctor wrote:
Ian, YOU did use the term "power" correctly. What I didn't like about it was that the question I posed referred to force. (OK, so you gave us some additional information) I agree that a sailplane, in gliding flight, in still air, has no "power" at all. (Although, as you said, some wrongly believe that gliders are "gravity powered") By some of the responses, I think I am correct in assuming that some confuse power, energy, and force. So I again ask, (not to Ian, but to some of the others who answered my question with "gravity",) how can gravity alone, a force which acts vertically downward, impart forward motion to a glider or anything for that matter? Cookie I don't. I used "power" because I meant "power"! Ian |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Seeking towplanes for Region 9 | [email protected] | Soaring | 0 | May 17th 06 12:03 AM |
US:Restricted Towplanes | Judy Ruprecht | Soaring | 8 | November 5th 04 11:27 PM |
Standard Nationals Need Towplanes | C AnthMin | Soaring | 5 | July 14th 04 12:46 AM |
Take-upReels on Towplanes | Nyal Williams | Soaring | 9 | April 21st 04 12:39 AM |
Helicopters and Towplanes | Burt Compton | Soaring | 6 | September 11th 03 05:21 PM |