![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() " jls" wrote in message ... http://www.glcq.com/bush_at_arpc1.htm GW Bush is a waste of human flesh. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
From: " jls"
Date: 8/23/2004 7:10 AM Central Daylight Time Message-id: http://www.glcq.com/bush_at_arpc1.htm I got as far as the ARPC gag. For those who never served during that time frame let me explain. The site said Bush never finished his 6 year commitment. The authour has no idea what that means. During that time ALL males 18 and over had a 6 year obligation unless excused for valid reasons (conscientious objector, medical etc). This means if one signed up for 3 years active duty in the Army and completed those 3 years and got out he STILL had 3 years inactive reserves before being released. If Bush didn't serve his 6 years in either Guard, active or reserves the remaining time was INACTIVE reserve. The six year obligation was the same for officers, warrants and enlisteds. As an aside retirees have a 10 year inactive reserve obligation upon retirement. Think what you want about Bush, but wild accusations and name calling proves absoultely nothing. Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
From: "Ray"
Date: 8/23/2004 2:16 PM Central Daylight Time Message-id: k.net On 23-Aug-2004, (B2431) wrote: I got as far as the ARPC gag. For those who never served during that time frame let me explain. The site said Bush never finished his 6 year commitment. The authour has no idea what that means. During that time ALL males 18 and over had a 6 year obligation unless excused for valid reasons (conscientious objector, medical etc). This means if one signed up for 3 years active duty in the Army and completed those 3 years and got out he STILL had 3 years inactive reserves before being released. If Bush didn't serve his 6 years in either Guard, active or reserves the remaining time was INACTIVE reserve. The six year obligation was the same for officers, warrants and enlisteds. As an aside retirees have a 10 year inactive reserve obligation upon retirement. Actually, you don't retire until you have 30 years in. If you transfer to the Fleet Reserve at say 22 years, you only have 8 years of inactive service until you're officially retired. Think what you want about Bush, but wild accusations and name calling proves absoultely nothing. Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired Ray U.S. Navy retired I guess I will reread my retirement papers. I retired with about 21 years and I think I got a 10 year commitment. You are probably right. It's been a long time. Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() From: " jls" Date: 8/23/2004 7:10 AM Central Daylight Time Message-id: http://www.glcq.com/bush_at_arpc1.htm I got as far as the ARPC gag. For those who never served during that time frame let me explain. The site said Bush never finished his 6 year commitment. The authour has no idea what that means. During that time ALL males 18 and over had a 6 year obligation unless excused for valid reasons (conscientious objector, medical etc). This means if one signed up for 3 years active duty in the Army and completed those 3 years and got out he STILL had 3 years inactive reserves before being released. If Bush didn't serve his 6 years in either Guard, active or reserves the remaining time was INACTIVE reserve. The six year obligation was the same for officers, warrants and enlisteds. As an aside retirees have a 10 year inactive reserve obligation upon retirement. Think what you want about Bush, but wild accusations and name calling proves absoultely nothing. Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired On the contrary Dan, I proves a great deal...just not about Bush. Bob Reed www.kisbuild.r-a-reed-assoc.com (KIS Builders Site) KIS Cruiser in progress...Slow but steady progress.... "Ladies and Gentlemen, take my advice, pull down your pants and Slide on the Ice!" (M.A.S.H. Sidney Freedman) |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
From: osite (RobertR237)
Date: 8/23/2004 8:51 PM Central Daylight Time Message-id: From: " jls" Date: 8/23/2004 7:10 AM Central Daylight Time Message-id: http://www.glcq.com/bush_at_arpc1.htm I got as far as the ARPC gag. For those who never served during that time frame let me explain. The site said Bush never finished his 6 year commitment. The authour has no idea what that means. During that time ALL males 18 and over had a 6 year obligation unless excused for valid reasons (conscientious objector, medical etc). This means if one signed up for 3 years active duty in the Army and completed those 3 years and got out he STILL had 3 years inactive reserves before being released. If Bush didn't serve his 6 years in either Guard, active or reserves the remaining time was INACTIVE reserve. The six year obligation was the same for officers, warrants and enlisteds. As an aside retirees have a 10 year inactive reserve obligation upon retirement. Think what you want about Bush, but wild accusations and name calling proves absoultely nothing. Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired On the contrary Dan, I proves a great deal...just not about Bush. Bob Reed I hadn't look at it that way. You are correct. Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "B2431" wrote in message ... From: osite (RobertR237) Date: 8/23/2004 8:51 PM Central Daylight Time Message-id: From: " jls" Date: 8/23/2004 7:10 AM Central Daylight Time Message-id: http://www.glcq.com/bush_at_arpc1.htm I got as far as the ARPC gag. For those who never served during that time frame let me explain. The site said Bush never finished his 6 year commitment. The authour has no idea what that means. During that time ALL males 18 and over had a 6 year obligation unless excused for valid reasons (conscientious objector, medical etc). This means if one signed up for 3 years active duty in the Army and completed those 3 years and got out he STILL had 3 years inactive reserves before being released. If Bush didn't serve his 6 years in either Guard, active or reserves the remaining time was INACTIVE reserve. The six year obligation was the same for officers, warrants and enlisteds. As an aside retirees have a 10 year inactive reserve obligation upon retirement. Think what you want about Bush, but wild accusations and name calling proves absoultely nothing. Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired On the contrary Dan, I proves a great deal...just not about Bush. Bob Reed I hadn't look at it that way. You are correct. Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired Any of you guys recall NG's with 4 year active reserve commitments in the late 60's, early 70's? I don't. Every single NG I knew was on 6 year ACTIVE reserve status. I'm sure many of them would have enjoyed getting cut loose early too. ![]() Phil |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
From: "PAW"
Date: 8/25/2004 1:22 AM Central Daylight Time Message-id: "B2431" wrote in message ... From: osite (RobertR237) Date: 8/23/2004 8:51 PM Central Daylight Time Message-id: From: " jls" Date: 8/23/2004 7:10 AM Central Daylight Time Message-id: http://www.glcq.com/bush_at_arpc1.htm I got as far as the ARPC gag. For those who never served during that time frame let me explain. The site said Bush never finished his 6 year commitment. The authour has no idea what that means. During that time ALL males 18 and over had a 6 year obligation unless excused for valid reasons (conscientious objector, medical etc). This means if one signed up for 3 years active duty in the Army and completed those 3 years and got out he STILL had 3 years inactive reserves before being released. If Bush didn't serve his 6 years in either Guard, active or reserves the remaining time was INACTIVE reserve. The six year obligation was the same for officers, warrants and enlisteds. As an aside retirees have a 10 year inactive reserve obligation upon retirement. Think what you want about Bush, but wild accusations and name calling proves absoultely nothing. Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired On the contrary Dan, I proves a great deal...just not about Bush. Bob Reed I hadn't look at it that way. You are correct. Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired Any of you guys recall NG's with 4 year active reserve commitments in the late 60's, early 70's? I don't. Every single NG I knew was on 6 year ACTIVE reserve status. I'm sure many of them would have enjoyed getting cut loose early too. ![]() Phil The commitment was a total of 6 years. I know people who did Guard fo 6 years and and some who did 4 years. Never having done Guard I'm not sure how they did it. Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
I wonder if Chris Thomas is a real pilot? Anybody know? | Badwater Bill | Home Built | 116 | September 3rd 04 05:43 PM |
Pilot Error? Is it Mr. Damron? | Badwater Bill | Home Built | 3 | June 23rd 04 04:05 PM |
Single-Seat Accident Records (Was BD-5B) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 41 | November 20th 03 05:39 AM |
Effect of Light Sport on General Aviation | Gilan | Home Built | 17 | September 24th 03 06:11 AM |