Landing without flaps

"Jim Logajan" wrote in message
.. .
Dan wrote:
My suggestion was that the Air Force replace the mower guys with
sheep.

If you had suggested goats your idea might have been implemented.
;-)

Yeah, I'm thinking the same thing Jim. I think the Air Force had "other"
reasons for passing on the sheep.

Now we just have to wonder if Dan really wanted them for mowing the grass.

On Mar 7, 4:43*pm, "Maxwell" luv^2^fly^99@^cox.^net wrote:
"Jim Logajan" wrote in message

.. .

Dan wrote:
My suggestion was that the Air Force replace the mower guys with
sheep.

If you had suggested goats your idea might have been implemented.
;-)

Yeah, I'm thinking the same thing Jim. I think the Air Force had "other"
reasons for passing on the sheep.

Now we just have to wonder if Dan really wanted them for mowing the grass.

You mean he's a closet........................................
knitter?

Cheers

buttman wrote in news:e15473b8-11ae-4778-a67f-
:



How many times do I have to say this? I don't care what you think of
me.


I think maybe about 1,000 more times.

I'm closer to being convinced every time you do.



Bertie

"Ken S. Tucker" wrote in
:

On Mar 4, 7:35 pm, george wrote:
On Mar 5, 4:06 pm, Dudley Henriques wrote:

You noticed that too huh??? :-)))) Well, I guess the extra weight
helps to get that ole airplane down again on the remaining runway
when you pull that ole mixture back on a student right after
rotation :-))))

I still can't believe that some-one claiming to be a pilot made the
'pull mixture on takeoff' statement and is still here

What's a typo, or it there a reason?

Oh you know, it't the entry to the "triple outside inverted spoin on
takeoff"

BTW, here's a video of that x-wind landing...
http://www.thestar.com/News/World/article/309221
(It ****es me off it's an amateur video, for the price
of a bit of tape, one would think all landings should
be properly video taped, cheap ****in' ****s).


What, so ubes like you could misinterpret them down at the 7-11?

Anyway, the rudder steering seems odd to me,

Yeah, right fjukktard.


Bertie

"Ken S. Tucker" wrote in
:




A 7-11 can afford video survalience



Got caught shoplifting chaw again eh?


Bertie

WingFlaps wrote in
:

On Mar 6, 8:49*am, "Ken S. Tucker" wrote:
On Mar 5, 6:17 am, Gig 601XL Builder
wrote:





Ken S. Tucker wrote:
On Mar 4, 7:35 pm, george wrote:
On Mar 5, 4:06 pm, Dudley Henriques wrote:

You noticed that too huh??? :-)))) Well, I guess the extra
weight he
lps
to get that ole airplane down again on the remaining runway
when you

pull that ole mixture back on a student right after rotation
:-))))
I still can't believe that some-one claiming to be a pilot made
the 'pull mixture on takeoff' statement and is still here

What's a typo, or it there a reason?

BTW, here's a video of that x-wind landing...
http://www.thestar.com/News/World/article/309221
(It ****es me off it's an amateur video, for the price
of a bit of tape, one would think all landings should
be properly video taped, cheap ****in' ****s).

Anyway, the rudder steering seems odd to me,
based on squinty frame advance...grrrr.
Ken

Weren't you the guy that was also suggesting that the runway be
subject to a walk down before every take-off?

For major airports, radar is being developed,
but I think dogs could do it faster and better.


Hey that was my idea! Do you like it really? I worry though, will dog
**** on the airport runway be a problem when projected by jet blast?
What do you think?


Well, obviously they would wear diapers.


Bertie

buttman wrote in
:


.

The gallant Dan rolls in wearing his finest white knight armor to
defend the honor of his fair maiden Dudly. How touching.


I thnk I'm starting to se how little you care.. Do go on.

Bertie

buttman wrote in news:40ecef62-ab94-4c32-aa89-
:

On Mar 4, 7:46 pm, Dan wrote:

In your case, I think you spend far too much time typing defensive
tomes.

Dan

Well that kind of what happens when you have about a dozen people
following you around throwing stones in glass houses.


At, fjukkwit, at.


Bertie

buttman wrote in news:24e58b46-6e28-45c9-93fb-
:

On Mar 4, 6:57 pm, Dudley Henriques wrote:

I have nothing against you personally. I don't even know you. You don't
use your actual name and the stage personna you've chosen souns like it
came from a 2 year old.

You think I don't know that? I picked this name for that very reason.
I don't play that name game crap. It don't matter what name appears
above my posts, the meaning stays the same.

Just a vast difference in opinion
between you and me as to how flight instruction should be performed.

You're darn right. If a student comes to me asking about somethi9ng,
I'll do my best to explain it to him in terms he or she can
understand. I'll never just bluntly say "This is how it is" without
any kind of reasoning, which is the technique you seem to prefer. I've
asked you how many times now to point out what exactly you find so
appaling about my ability to be an instructor? All I ever get from you
is "You are downright dangerous", "You damage this profession", "I
would never fly with you", these are very loaded words to be using
without any kind of backup whatsoever.

You don't post here because you care about safety. You don't post here
because you care about instructing. You don't even post here because
you care about aviation. You post here so you can call out people like
myself on weak bases such as my freaking internet chitchat handle.
Your existence here has never, and will never be anything more than a
huge ego stroke.

Hey,I never called you on yournhandle and I can see you are a complete and
utter tit..

Bertie

On Mar 6, 10:43 pm, "Maxwell" luv^2^fly^99@^cox.^net wrote:


Yeah, I'm thinking the same thing Jim. I think the Air Force had "other"
reasons for passing on the sheep.

Now we just have to wonder if Dan really wanted them for mowing the grass.

I'm not from Iowa, where men are men and sheep are scared....