![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#161
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ron Wanttaja" wrote in message ... On Wed, 10 Sep 2003 01:06:19 GMT, "C.D. Damron" wrote: It's interesting to note that Dr. Barton Pakull, the FAA chief psychiatrist involved in the Hoover case, also testified against Campbell in 1980. A very nice post, Ron. Considering that this thread is reaching 200 posts, I have three more words to add: GAME, SET, MATCH! (we now return you to your regularly scheduled programming, in progress) |
#162
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Ron Wanttaja says...
Oh, I don't know. There might be other reasons he refused to endorse it. A more telling situation is in Hoover's OWN book. In the chapter where he discusses his FAA problems, he thanks, by name, about two dozen people for their help in regaining his medical. He doesn't mention Jim Campbell. Hmmmm I wonder why? could it be that Hoover didn't think zoom was as important as zoom thinks he is? Credibility it's about credibility. When it comes down to it zoom always falls short. Note Campbell's claim regarding Hoover's reaction when he got his medical back: http://makeashorterlink.com/?C27721AD5 If Bob Hoover was so grateful for Campbell's help that he called Jim first, why did Hoover shun Zoom when he wrote his own book? That's what a lot of us would like to know .Well not really because those of us who know zoom didn't believe Hoover called zoom in the first place . So Hoover's non acknowledgement of zoom is proof positive that zoom lied about the importance of his involvement. Credibility it's about credibility. zoom is a phony and those who believe him are fools or are being fooled. IMHO Chuck S RAH-15/1 ret 'credibility it was always about credibility" chuck s |
#163
|
|||
|
|||
![]() On 09 Sep 2003 05:33 PM, Ron Wanttaja posted the following: It's interesting to note that Dr. Barton Pakull, the FAA chief psychiatrist involved in the Hoover case, also testified against Campbell in 1980. One wonders how much Campbell's efforts in the Hoover case were due to the wish to help right the wrongs against Hoover vs. the chance to get revenge against the one of the men who destroyed Campbell's chance at an airline career. snip This just gets better and better. Del Rawlins- ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Wherre the hell is juan when you really need him? g Barnyard BOb -- |
#164
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Now you know that Juan will claim an "out" on that last serve, to
prolong the game! "C.D. Damron" wrote: "Ron Wanttaja" wrote in message ... On Wed, 10 Sep 2003 01:06:19 GMT, "C.D. Damron" wrote: It's interesting to note that Dr. Barton Pakull, the FAA chief psychiatrist involved in the Hoover case, also testified against Campbell in 1980. A very nice post, Ron. Considering that this thread is reaching 200 posts, I have three more words to add: GAME, SET, MATCH! (we now return you to your regularly scheduled programming, in progress) |
#165
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Barnyard BOb -- wrote: On 09 Sep 2003 05:33 PM, Ron Wanttaja posted the following: It's interesting to note that Dr. Barton Pakull, the FAA chief psychiatrist involved in the Hoover case, also testified against Campbell in 1980. One wonders how much Campbell's efforts in the Hoover case were due to the wish to help right the wrongs against Hoover vs. the chance to get revenge against the one of the men who destroyed Campbell's chance at an airline career. snip This just gets better and better. Del Rawlins- ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Wherre the hell is juan when you really need him? g Barnyard BOb -- Most likely gathering his rebuttal ammunition. You don't suppose he is checking with his hero now do you? Nah, that would be too easy, and he probably would become one of the zoomed if he did. Warren |
#166
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Warren & Nancy says...
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Wherre the hell is juan when you really need him? g Barnyard BOb -- Most likely gathering his rebuttal ammunition. You don't suppose he is checking with his hero now do you? Nah, that would be too easy, and he probably would become one of the zoomed if he did. He ran as usual when the facts fly in his face. Probably zoomy told him to shut up before I started posting all the "sucessfully sued" lawsuits in zooms past. Boys and Girls club etc..... He's good for smart alec remarks but he's the kind of guy that the girls in my old neighborood would beat up for being a sniviling weasel. See ya Chuck S RAH-15/1 ret "credibility it was always about credibility" chuck s |
#167
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Eric Miller" wrote in message . net... I didn't contradict myself. Where motorcycles and flying machines are concerned the USER must accept more responsibility. That's why we preflight. No, that's why -you- preflight. The fact that the designer and builder have _equal_ responsibility is evidenced by the 18 years of liability that are attached to anything they design and build. You don't have to go to trial to make an issue of something, but you don't have to raise all issus before the trial. Round and round you go... Especially where the account is provided a) by a lawyer b) in support of advertising services. Except the account provided by the defense is purely factual. The account provided by the plaintiff relies purely on faith and a gaggle of brownnosers. Can you agree that settlements can happen without merit (which is different from frivilous) and issues can be raised in trial that don't come up pre-trial? Say yes and I can stop posting! Sometimes. Doesn't look like it in this case. ![]() Juan |
#168
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "ChuckSlusarczyk" wrote in message ... I admitted no such thing your like your hero zoom playing word games and twisting the factsand telling the lie so often that you believe it. If that's the case looks like you two must be twins separated at birth. # LK-989-3 I believe that's the Morgan Case which I located today, after I read it over to refresh my memory I'll comment on it here ,in public .I will also comment on the Florida case you mentioned .But if you were as good at digging up dirt as you think you are you should have known the George Conn subject has been talked about quite a bit in this public forum. Ask Kevin O'Brien about the paperwork I showed him concerning the George Conn situation. Once again I got nothing to hide . Sure, now that I have proven that neither I nor Jim was lying, there is in fact nothing to hide, is there. More to the point, there is nothing you can hide now. In fact Conn and I have a case pending right now and as soon as we get it over with if anyone wants to know how it comes out I'll tell them . As I said before I got nothing to hide unlike your hero zoom. I already knew that. ![]() Next time, think twice before posting messages implying I am lying about you. |
#169
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "ChuckSlusarczyk" wrote in message ... Frankly Bill if I had my druthers I would rather that 9 years ago zoom just would have left me alone. Perhaps you should have followed your own advice. You would have saved yourself the problems. |
#170
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
ChuckSlusarczyk wrote in message ...
In article , Larry Smith says... Well, I'd say Campbell is more bad than good but exposing Fetters was a contribution, nonetheless. And didn't Campbell take up Bob Hoover's cross? I say you've got to acknowledge him even if he is a *******. Course, I haven't been sued by Campbell so I guess I can't get as bitter at him as some of you. But, yeah, he's an ass. Actually I've heard some accounts that zooms involvement in the Hoover issue was actually a hinderence not a help. zooms diatribes against the FAA only hardened their resolve. I heard Hoover didn't even endorse zooms book about the case. One would think that if Hoover was so indebted to zoom for his help he would have endorsed it.IMHO See ya Chuck S RAH-15/1 ret "a jerk and his master are still jerks" chuck s ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Hey Chuck; Remember when we conspired to steal zooms chicken, Hoover was hiding between some vehicles behind the tent.Cause that's where we found zoomy sucking up to Hoover when we wanted to thank him for the chicken. Back then we thought Hoover was ashamed to be seen in public with the mooz.I know that you haven't forgot about him wanting to have you arrested for poultry pilfering. Frank M.Hitlaw, Executive Assistant to El Pollo Loco (Far East Division) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Latest Pipistrel Motorglider Newsletter Uploaded | Michael Coates | Home Built | 1 | September 16th 03 06:04 PM |
so what is the latest word on Sport Pilot ??? | Gilan | Home Built | 12 | September 7th 03 11:14 PM |
Latest Ripon & Fisk (OSH) Updates | Jim Weir | Home Built | 4 | July 20th 03 10:59 PM |
Latest Newsletter | Michael Coates | Home Built | 3 | July 15th 03 10:04 PM |