XM question for Garmin 396/496 owers

Jay Honeck wrote:
(presumably, Stella wrote, but Jay snipped the credit, so all bets are off)
Not counting the McCain donors who've been pretending to be converted
Hilary supporters, the real former Hilary supporters don't plan to
vote against Obama, a man, by casting their vote for McCain, another
man whose politics are all the opposite of the party they support.
Even if he trots out a woman whose foreign policy expertise consists
of being located somewhere right across the ocean from Russia.

Another interesting aspect of Palin's choice as Veep is that the Obama
people *can't* criticize Palin's lack of experience without the
spotlight reflecting right back on their candidate's woeful lack of
testing.

That cuts both ways. Not only did McCain pull the rug out from under his own
argument, but Palin is completely "untested" with no national-level
experience at all.

Bottom line: Palin has more experience (and, more importantly, more
*executive* experience running a state government) than Obama has in
the Senate.

Well, only the shallow thinkers would conclude that without any details.
There are many office holders that are "experienced" in ways that we would
not want to suffer. I'll wait for the vetting process to decide about Palin.

BTW: Your choice of language -- and bias -- is telling, Stella.
Imagine, a man "trotting out" a woman, like this is some sort of
equestrian event?

It's better than McCain's attitude as reflected in his offering up Cindy as
a porno contestant at Sturgis. Or, did you miss that one?

Neil

Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
"Neil Gould" wrote in
Jay Honeck wrote:

BTW: Your choice of language -- and bias -- is telling, Stella.
Imagine, a man "trotting out" a woman, like this is some sort of
equestrian event?

It's better than McCain's attitude as reflected in his offering up
Cindy as a porno contestant at Sturgis. Or, did you miss that one?



Well I sure did! They're sounding beter al the time!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N4X6XqNeF1o

Morgans schrieb:
it already is ... boring.

So Martin, since you live in what, Austria, and have no stake in the
election of a USA president, and you obviously think much less of the US,
why don't you....

well, the outcome of the election has many effects on how the world
(economy, politics, etc.) will work for the next years. So IMHO it is
not the worst idea to be informed, even when living outside of your
country and not being allowed to vote (it is your election).

#m

John Smith wrote in news:jsmith-64DB42.11042401092008
@nntp.aioe.org:

In article ,
Bertie the Bunyip wrote:

Why would they do that?

Why would who do what?

Exactly.

Exactly who would do what?

Of course.

Why, I don't know?

That's my point.


Bertie

Shirl wrote in
:

"Jay Honeck" wrote:
BTW: Your choice of language -- and bias -- is telling, Stella.
Imagine, a man "trotting out" a woman, like this is some sort of
equestrian event? Wow, if I had used that turn of phrase, you'd have
crucified me. Given your known political stance, however,
(somewhere to the left of Hugo Chavez) it adds up -- but it's still
somewhat shocking to see such a partisan technique used by a woman
against a woman candidate.

Oh, but describing McCain's choice as "genius" just because he picked
a FEMALE running mate -- nevermind the fact that he'd known her for 6
months and met with her TWICE before the announcement -- even so much
as stating that he'll pick up the former Hillary supporters now,
regardless of Palin's politics, **simply because she's a woman** is
okay

You're talking to someone who watches Fox news here.....
and not for it's comedic value..

Bertie

"Kadaitcha Man" wrote in news:ijlh2y$otm$1
@alt.education.yeasty-viado.org.romania:

Bertie the Bunyip, ye unmuzzled king-of-urinals, I desire that we be
better strangers, ye pecked:

"Kadaitcha Man" wrote in news:d7m4yb$r36
:

Bertie the Bunyip, ye pot-bellied thin-skin, sit there, the lyingest
knave in Christendom, ye scrawled:

"Kadaitcha Man" wrote in news:7w5fi0$jg8
:

Bertie the Bunyip, ye cockered very weak monster, your bum is the
greatest thing about you, so that, in the beastliest sense, you
are
Pomey the Great, ye averred:

John Smith wrote in news:jsmith-
B9FB33.08492901092008
@nntp.aioe.org:

In article ,
Bertie the Bunyip wrote:

Why would they do that?

Why would who do what?


Exactly.


Exactly who would do what?


Of course.


indicates up
Mister ****ing Ed.

That's the answer I'd endorse


one handed applause


The torch of doubt and chaos, this is how the sage navigates.



Bertie

"Kadaitcha Man" wrote in news:4kbs4q$d19
:

Bertie the Bunyip, ye obscene clownish fool, live in the rank sweat of
an enseamed bed, strewed in corruption, honeying and making love over a
nasty sty, ye pattered:

"Zebulon" @###@.^net wrote in :


"Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message
...


So, no wyou have a messiah complex?


Bertie

No, you have clearly cornered the market on that one.


I have returned to set my k00ks free.

Hillary? Is that you?


Mrs clinton or George's labrador?


Bertie

on 8/31/2008 8:41 PM Jay Honeck said the following:
Only an idiot like you could consider her well-educated.

Gosh, Rich, you really know how to forward a conversation.

And you really know how to duck and jive when presented with facts
contrary to your moronic, ill-informed views.

on 8/31/2008 7:14 PM Ramsey said the following:
"Rich Ahrens" wrote in message
ouse.com...

Who cares what you think, your a known dumb ass, just like MX.

Isn't it about time you morphed again, Maxie?

on 9/1/2008 9:30 AM Neil Gould said the following:
Jay Honeck wrote:
(presumably, Stella wrote, but Jay snipped the credit, so all bets are off)
Not counting the McCain donors who've been pretending to be converted
Hilary supporters, the real former Hilary supporters don't plan to
vote against Obama, a man, by casting their vote for McCain, another
man whose politics are all the opposite of the party they support.
Even if he trots out a woman whose foreign policy expertise consists
of being located somewhere right across the ocean from Russia.
Another interesting aspect of Palin's choice as Veep is that the Obama
people *can't* criticize Palin's lack of experience without the
spotlight reflecting right back on their candidate's woeful lack of
testing.

That cuts both ways. Not only did McCain pull the rug out from under his own
argument, but Palin is completely "untested" with no national-level
experience at all.

Bottom line: Palin has more experience (and, more importantly, more
*executive* experience running a state government) than Obama has in
the Senate.

Well, only the shallow thinkers would conclude that without any details.
There are many office holders that are "experienced" in ways that we would
not want to suffer. I'll wait for the vetting process to decide about Palin.

BTW: Your choice of language -- and bias -- is telling, Stella.
Imagine, a man "trotting out" a woman, like this is some sort of
equestrian event?

It's better than McCain's attitude as reflected in his offering up Cindy as
a porno contestant at Sturgis. Or, did you miss that one?

And don't forget his calling her Bertie's old term of endearment (starts
with a "c", ends with a "t", and has a "u" and an "n" in the middle) in
public on a campaign stop back in the 90s. How any woman could vote for
someone like that is stunning...