Errors accessing FAA's Pilotweb

It's been tried multiple times- as PT Barnum said, there's a sucker born
every minute, and Anthony preys on the willingness of other people offering
him honest advice.

On Feb 5, 11:46*am, "Darkwing" theducksmail"AT"yahoo.com wrote:
"Mxsmanic" wrote in message

...

Jon writes:

It's the difference between actually having the access to the
information. I work with the folks at NAIMES, I've done actual work on
some of their systems. They are hard working folks with integrity.

So why are these Web pages secured with SSL,

To keep the Logic algorithm spinning in an infinite loop wondering
why, of course.

and why are they secured by a
certificate that isn't included in many browsers?

The certificates are self-signed.

Name a few of the people with whom you're working, and their job titles..

The Manic Mechanic claimed to be in-the-loop earlier in the thread
with:

" If it's the person I'm thinking of, he has had at least a year to
fix the problem, and yet it's still there."

You first, since you were so kind to inform us of how plugged in you
are. Shouldn't require too much careful thinking.

Asshole.

Certainly expects things from others, doesn't he/it? Reminds me of a
child before it learns to grow up.

On Feb 5, 4:48*pm, "Viperdoc" wrote:
It's been tried multiple times- as PT Barnum said, there's a sucker born
every minute, and Anthony preys on the willingness of other people offering
him honest advice.

No, he preys on the NEW people that may wander into the group not
knowing his history.

His words in this very thread...

MX wrote
I didn't expect any useful answers
here but I figured it wouldn't hurt to try, as there are always new pilots
visiting who aren't members of the treehouse club.

Ironically, this is the first time that I have seen that nobody new
has chimed in AND he did not get an answer to his question.

Just maybe there is hope????

"Darkwing" theducksmail"AT"yahoo.com writes:

Asshole.

There are lots of people by that name. Can you be more specific?

Jon writes:

The certificates are self-signed.

Most keys are self-signed. But it's not the self-signature that makes them
secure, it's a signature by some other entity that is trusted. If they are at
the top of the hierarchy, as in this case, then they must be explicitly
trusted--which, in a browser, means that they must be in the browser's
database of trusted certificates. The certificate under discussion is not in
that database, and thus an exception occurs when the certificate is used or
referenced to establish SSL sessions.

On Feb 6, 10:16*am, Mxsmanic wrote:
Jon writes:
The certificates are self-signed.

Most keys are self-signed. *But it's not the self-signature that makes them
secure, it's a signature by some other entity that is trusted. *If they are at
the top of the hierarchy, as in this case, then they must be explicitly
trusted--which, in a browser, means that they must be in the browser's
database of trusted certificates. *The certificate under discussion is not in
that database, and thus an exception occurs when the certificate is used or
referenced to establish SSL sessions.

The certifcate is self-signed.

Mxsmanic wrote:
Jon writes:

The certificates are self-signed.

Most keys are self-signed. But it's not the self-signature that makes them
secure, it's a signature by some other entity that is trusted. If they are at
the top of the hierarchy, as in this case, then they must be explicitly
trusted--which, in a browser, means that they must be in the browser's
database of trusted certificates. The certificate under discussion is not in
that database, and thus an exception occurs when the certificate is used or
referenced to establish SSL sessions.

Babbling, arm-waving nonsense.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-signed_certificate

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Certificate_authority


--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

writes:

Babbling, arm-waving nonsense.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-signed_certificate

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Certificate_authority

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Root_certificate

Mxsmanic wrote:
writes:

Babbling, arm-waving nonsense.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-signed_certificate

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Certificate_authority

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Root_certificate

No ****?

Did you read and understand it?

Obviously not.


--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

Viperdoc schrieb:
The moron averages nearly 18 full time weeks a year playing his game. If he
worked half of that time he could have an instrument rating and his own
plane by now.

sorry, but it seems that you have to much time on your hand as you are
still feeding this guy. It is one thing beeing an idiot, but I don't
know if it is better arguing with one.

so save your breath, killfile him.

#m