A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Greetings from your friendly, neighborhood, TERRORIST!



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #181  
Old October 12th 04, 02:07 AM
Paul
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Does anyone remember Bob Edwards on the morning show on NPR?

I used to listen to the guy years ago. Seemed like a real likeable
person and seemed to have a balanced view. Every Friday he would
interview Red Barber, the retired baseball announcer, did it till Red
passed on. Both were the epitomy gentlemenliness. At least it seemed
so to me.

In any event, I believe it was last year, I tuned into Dr. Laura while
driving and Mr. Edwards was on being interviewed about his new book or
some such. I believe the conversation turned to partial birth
abortion and Mr. Edwards expressed a negative view toward the
procedure.

I recall that shortly thereafter Mr. Edwards'
air time was reduced, and within
a very brief period of time he was out on the pretext that they wanted
to bring some fresh "perspectives" to the program. And now, of
course, he is on XM radio
and me being a Sirius subscriber, I no longer hear him.

I think he expressed an opinion that was anathemae to some groups with
influence over at NPR and he was pushed!

So much for freedom of expression and toleration of other views. I
think its
call PC.


Paul D. Hilsenrath

(Jay Masino) wrote in message ...
Jay Honeck wrote:
Was ANY of this reported on CBS/ABC/NBC or my local, Gannett-owned
newspaper? Nope.
Which is why I listen to NPR. It may be liberal in many ways, but they
report the WHOLE truth.


I'm pretty sure I heard the same thing that NPR reported, on several
different CBS/ABC/NBC stations in the DC area.

  #182  
Old October 12th 04, 03:21 AM
G.R. Patterson III
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Ace Pilot wrote:

From "A Measure of Media Bias":

"Our results show a very significant liberal bias....."


This month's "Atlantic" contained an article which touched on why. The author pointed
out that almost all members of the media are well educated and paid well above the
middle class. In addition, the industry is centered around the East Coast. As
individuals, they have the liberal bias prevalent in their class of people, and this
shows in their work.

George Patterson
If a man gets into a fight 3,000 miles away from home, he *had* to have
been looking for it.
  #183  
Old October 12th 04, 03:21 AM
G.R. Patterson III
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Ace Pilot wrote:

From "A Measure of Media Bias":

"Our results show a very significant liberal bias....."


This month's "Atlantic" contained an article which touched on why. The author pointed
out that almost all members of the media are well educated and paid well above the
middle class. In addition, the industry is centered around the East Coast. As
individuals, they have the liberal bias prevalent in their class of people, and this
shows in their work.

George Patterson
If a man gets into a fight 3,000 miles away from home, he *had* to have
been looking for it.
  #184  
Old October 12th 04, 05:30 AM
Jay Honeck
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Mr. Edwards was on being interviewed about his new book or
some such. I believe the conversation turned to partial birth
abortion and Mr. Edwards expressed a negative view toward the
procedure.

I recall that shortly thereafter Mr. Edwards'
air time was reduced, and within
a very brief period of time he was out on the pretext that they wanted
to bring some fresh "perspectives" to the program.


I badly miss Bob Edwards, and have never heard this story before.

The whole concept of his being replaced to appeal to a younger demographic
always seemed trumped up to me, but I just figured that he, like so many
others before him, had simply peed in somebody's Wheaties, and had been
shown the door.

It would be truly disappointing if he was fired for expressing an unpopular
(within the liberal community) viewpoint.
--
Jay Honeck
Iowa City, IA
Pathfinder N56993
www.AlexisParkInn.com
"Your Aviation Destination"


  #185  
Old October 12th 04, 05:30 AM
Jay Honeck
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Mr. Edwards was on being interviewed about his new book or
some such. I believe the conversation turned to partial birth
abortion and Mr. Edwards expressed a negative view toward the
procedure.

I recall that shortly thereafter Mr. Edwards'
air time was reduced, and within
a very brief period of time he was out on the pretext that they wanted
to bring some fresh "perspectives" to the program.


I badly miss Bob Edwards, and have never heard this story before.

The whole concept of his being replaced to appeal to a younger demographic
always seemed trumped up to me, but I just figured that he, like so many
others before him, had simply peed in somebody's Wheaties, and had been
shown the door.

It would be truly disappointing if he was fired for expressing an unpopular
(within the liberal community) viewpoint.
--
Jay Honeck
Iowa City, IA
Pathfinder N56993
www.AlexisParkInn.com
"Your Aviation Destination"


  #186  
Old October 12th 04, 05:37 AM
Jim Rosinski
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"John Harlow" wrote

There is a "statistical center" of political views that the Yale study
most likely used to determine their results. This has nothing to do with
what you or I believe, if it's done properly.


All this does is show a statistical center of an opinion, which by
definition is not necessarily correct.


Hmmm. A statistical center of opinion "by definition is not
necessarily correct". Right up there with "There are absolutely no
absolutes". Monkeys at typewriters could produce more logical
coherency than most of what's been posted in this thread by the left.

Jim Rosinski

"If God is all-powerful, does that mean that He can make a boulder so
heavy that even He couldn't lift it?"
  #187  
Old October 12th 04, 05:37 AM
Jim Rosinski
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"John Harlow" wrote

There is a "statistical center" of political views that the Yale study
most likely used to determine their results. This has nothing to do with
what you or I believe, if it's done properly.


All this does is show a statistical center of an opinion, which by
definition is not necessarily correct.


Hmmm. A statistical center of opinion "by definition is not
necessarily correct". Right up there with "There are absolutely no
absolutes". Monkeys at typewriters could produce more logical
coherency than most of what's been posted in this thread by the left.

Jim Rosinski

"If God is all-powerful, does that mean that He can make a boulder so
heavy that even He couldn't lift it?"
  #188  
Old October 12th 04, 10:46 AM
Stefan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Jim Rosinski wrote:

Hmmm. A statistical center of opinion "by definition is not
necessarily correct".


I didn't write that, but anyway: If you read it as "A statistical center
of *opinion* by definition is not necessarily correct (i.e. does not
necessarily reflect the *facts* correctly)", then it makes a lot of sense.

Right up there with "There are absolutely no absolutes".


I wrote this one (actually, I wrote it somewhat differently). Only a
very small and very simple world can be coherent. As soon as you accept
the the world is a little more complex, you'll have to live with
incoherency. I tell you this as a physicist.

Too many people confound simplicity with simplification.

Stefan

  #189  
Old October 12th 04, 10:46 AM
Stefan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Jim Rosinski wrote:

Hmmm. A statistical center of opinion "by definition is not
necessarily correct".


I didn't write that, but anyway: If you read it as "A statistical center
of *opinion* by definition is not necessarily correct (i.e. does not
necessarily reflect the *facts* correctly)", then it makes a lot of sense.

Right up there with "There are absolutely no absolutes".


I wrote this one (actually, I wrote it somewhat differently). Only a
very small and very simple world can be coherent. As soon as you accept
the the world is a little more complex, you'll have to live with
incoherency. I tell you this as a physicist.

Too many people confound simplicity with simplification.

Stefan

  #190  
Old October 12th 04, 01:56 PM
John Harlow
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

There is a "statistical center" of political views that the Yale
study most likely used to determine their results. This has
nothing to do with what you or I believe, if it's done properly.


All this does is show a statistical center of an opinion, which by
definition is not necessarily correct.


Hmmm. A statistical center of opinion "by definition is not
necessarily correct". Right up there with "There are absolutely no
absolutes". Monkeys at typewriters could produce more logical
coherency than most of what's been posted in this thread by the left.


What I treid to point out is all the study "discovered" was the compilation
of the personal opinions of the interviewees. "Opinions" are simply that;
not "facts".

Here's another way to think about it:

As most people believe in Christianity, does that make it the "correct"
religion?

(source: http://www.straightdope.com/mailbag/mreligio.html )


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
"Friendly fire" Mike Naval Aviation 3 April 6th 04 06:07 PM
"Friendly fire" Mike Military Aviation 0 March 19th 04 02:36 PM
B-52 crew blamed for friendly fire death Paul Hirose Military Aviation 0 March 16th 04 12:49 AM
U.S. won't have to reveal other friendly fire events: Schmidt's lawyers hoped to use other incidents to help their case Otis Willie Military Aviation 0 December 18th 03 08:44 PM
12 Dec 2003 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News Otis Willie Naval Aviation 0 December 12th 03 11:01 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:55 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.