![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#181
|
|||
|
|||
|
Mike V. wrote:
"Chuck" wrote in message om... In another reply, I have defended my 3 luxuries, so I wont do it again here, but I have reason for those 3. Chuck, do not give these people a platform by letting them question your actions. Many folks who never had money problems and cannot understand what you are talking about either had the backing or were born with a silver spoon in their mouth. I meet these assholes all the time. Ivy league schools, mommy and daddy have money, inheritance, parents had money to send them to good and connected schools, etc. A small boost goes a long way when starting out in life - it makes all the difference and none of the people earned it themselves. Many handle the privelege admirably, but many also know in their hearts they never really achieved anything on their own steam, and they like to make themselved feel better by looking down on folks like you. I don't know about the others here, but you couldn't be more wrong in my case. I grew up in mobile homes and worked after high school for two years to save enough money for college. I got through by using my savings, working the maximum hours per week in work-study (20 hours on top of an engineering curriculum)and working every break (thanksgiving, Christmas, spring and summer). I got no support from my parents as they couldn't afford it, yet they made just enough so that I got basically zilch in grants ($300 a year as I recall). Sure, some folks are both into wealth, but you'll also find that most of them can't manage money to save their lives. The folks I've met who really know how to manage money are the one's who grew up with none and have had to learn to make do with what they have. I'm very fortunate that I now make a decent living, but I've always spent less than I earned whether I earned $10,000 a year or $100,000. And every car I've ever bought was paid for with cash saved in advance. Sure, I had to wait a few years after college before buying a new car, unlike my classmates who went out and got big loans for BMWs, but I'm not far better off that almost all of them. As for looking down on folks, I didn't make the original comment about idiots and suckers, however, the essence of the message is correct even if the word choice offends those with thin skin. It isn't a question of looking down on anyone, it is simply stating that fact that money spent on finance charges and interest is money no longer available for other things. That isn't a value judgement, it is a simple fact. I personally have no problem at all if people want to enrich the same corporations that they denouce as ruining America. That is their decision. Personally, I think that is nuts, but to each his own. Matt |
|
#182
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Matt Whiting" wrote in message ... What about when the A/C goes out in the house? (This is one of the times that I am glad that I rent) Refrigerator goes out? That is the purpose of saving up a small cash emergency fund. You are right, you can't predict when things like this will happen, but you can predict that they will happen so you have to plan and prepare in advance for them. Let me try to explain this to you even though you are clearly too damn stupid to understand: some people do not have enough money to get by, let alone some extra cash to set aside for emergencies. GET IT?? |
|
#183
|
|||
|
|||
|
Chuck wrote:
"Mike V." wrote in message news:hU0qd.105841$5K2.41539@attbi_s03... "Chuck" wrote in message .com... In another reply, I have defended my 3 luxuries, so I wont do it again here, but I have reason for those 3. Chuck, do not give these people a platform by letting them question your actions. Many folks who never had money problems and cannot understand what you are talking about either had the backing or were born with a silver spoon in their mouth. I meet these assholes all the time. Ivy league schools, mommy and daddy have money, inheritance, parents had money to send them to good and connected schools, etc. A small boost goes a long way when starting out in life - it makes all the difference and none of the people earned it themselves. Many handle the privelege admirably, but many also know in their hearts they never really achieved anything on their own steam, and they like to make themselved feel better by looking down on folks like you. Yea.. I think that I am done with this thread... I have tried my hardest to explain to people that I understand what they are saying and that I agree with them, but unfortunately, they can't understand that some people are not able to have cash laying around and in an EMERGENCY have no other choice but to use a credit card. I understand that very well. That is why I suggest that people start saving even a small amount each month towards building an emergency cash fund. But you are right, I think there are 2 or maybe 3 people here than understand what I am trying to say and then you have the jerks that have never experienced money problems and treat anyone that doesn't drive a Mercedes and belong to the country club, keep their Barron at their house at the airpark and go to the Playboy Mansion for parties like crap. These guys just don't get it... You are talking about that which you have no knowledge. I don't know if you consider me in the two or three, but I'm guessing you probably do. My daily driver is a 96 minivan with 160K miles. I have a 10 year-old pickup I use for plowing my driveway, hauling firewood, etc. I did get a 2003 minivan for my wife to drive as the 96 was getting to the point I didn't trust it with her and the kids. However, I bought a stripped down Chrysler program vehicle and paid only $13K for it. I've never owned a luxury car and probably never will as I much prefer my pickup. Likewise for the country club. I don't own an airplane because I built a new house four years ago and couldn't afford that and an airplane without going way into debt. So I sold the airplane to partially finance the house. I didn't buy my airplane until my first house was paid for. I hope to buy an airplane again, but won't until my current house is paid for. Sorry to burst your bubble. Matt |
|
#184
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Matt Whiting" wrote in message ... Welcome to the new America. I hope you like it. It is still the best country on earth warts and all. I don't like many things about it, but for the most part I like it pretty well. There are several hundred other countries available for those who don't like this one. Basically. Go screw youself. You and your big spending corporate protectionist conservative friends do not own the country. If I do not like what I see I get on my soap box and start speaking my mind. Which is exactly what I am doing. |
|
#185
|
|||
|
|||
|
Mike V. wrote:
"Matt Whiting" wrote in message ... What about when the A/C goes out in the house? (This is one of the times that I am glad that I rent) Refrigerator goes out? That is the purpose of saving up a small cash emergency fund. You are right, you can't predict when things like this will happen, but you can predict that they will happen so you have to plan and prepare in advance for them. Let me try to explain this to you even though you are clearly too damn stupid to understand: some people do not have enough money to get by, let alone some extra cash to set aside for emergencies. And how does spending even more money on interest and finance charges make this situation any better? If they don't have the money to set aside in advance, where do they get the money to pay the credit card bill after the fact? Yes, I really don't get it. Actually I do, but it embarrasses people when you point it out. Matt |
|
#186
|
|||
|
|||
|
Mike V. wrote:
"Matt Whiting" wrote in message ... Welcome to the new America. I hope you like it. It is still the best country on earth warts and all. I don't like many things about it, but for the most part I like it pretty well. There are several hundred other countries available for those who don't like this one. Basically. Go screw youself. You and your big spending corporate protectionist conservative friends do not own the country. If I do not like what I see I get on my soap box and start speaking my mind. Which is exactly what I am doing. I never said I owned it. You are really a bitter person. This isn't good for you. Matt |
|
#187
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Chuck" wrote in message . com... Are buying school clothes an luxury? No. What's your point? Are buying tools for work a luxury? No. You've already said you spend money on luxuries you clearly cannot afford. |
|
#188
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Mike V." wrote in message news d1qd.675986$8_6.344569@attbi_s04...Let me try to explain this to you even though you are clearly too damn stupid to understand: some people do not have enough money to get by, let alone some extra cash to set aside for emergencies. GET IT?? I get it. And there are people who are in poor financial situations because they've made poor decisions. Do you get that? |
|
#189
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Chuck" wrote in message m... Well, what if my transmission falls out of my truck or the engine blows? Both could be a reality with my truck since it has almost 200,000 miles on it. In this case, I would have to "spend money that I don't have". We do not have public transportation here to speak of and I work night shift anyways. Don't think that I could afford $40 for a cab every day... What about when the A/C goes out in the house? (This is one of the times that I am glad that I rent) Refrigerator goes out? Chuck, someday, hopefully, you'll get in the position of a set aside or reserve for those contingencies. Just as I suspect a number of folks here have. I'll bet more than one lurker is applying all this verbosity to themselves. How does the saying go? "....you are not alone...." Maybe you could start by putting away $20 a month, even if you have to cut back on something to do it. Take offense if you want, but unless you have the fortitude to leave that tiny fund alone, go get someone to help. Help in this case by you setting up an account that requires two signatures for withdrawal. If you go to church, ask your pastor, for example. In any case it has to be someone you can't bully into caving in. Relatives and pals are poor choices. The agreement you set with them is that the money is for legitimate emergencies, only. If you lie to beat the setup, you shouldn't cry about it. $20 doesn't sound like much, but you have to start somewhere. You have the misfortune at this point of opening yourself the the world with all the stuff you've presented. I think the thread was opened by somebody else. You've just become a focus. |
|
#190
|
|||
|
|||
|
Matt Whiting wrote in
: Because there is a lag time for these large attacks due to the planning involved. It is well documented that the worst attack on Americal soil was conceived, planned, and partially executed under Clinton. I haven't tried to count, but what is your data to claim more attacks on US soil under Bush than under Clinton? I can't think off-hand of any that have been conceived, planned and executed since Bush was in office. Matt 1) It was planned under Clinton, but executed under Bush. What part of 9/11, exactly, was executed under Clinton? Where is your data? 2) http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0884893.html provides a list of Al-Qaeda sponsored terrorist attacks since 1993. You are correct, though. In my second post I misspoke - these attacks were not on American soil, but they were on American targets. I don't think either of us will be swayed in this dispute... You seem to believe that the lack of another 9/11 type attack is due largely to the merit of Bush's policies, and do not consider the lag time for such a large attack in the equation, even while you use the same lag time to blame Clinton for the attacks in the first place. You have been fooled into feeling safe, and want to thank Bush for that, even though in reality, you are not much more or less safe than you were in 1993 or 2001. You go on with your life, happy to be protected by your wonderful, all- powerful Government. I, on the other hand, believe that Enemies of Freedom and of Western Civilization will continue to attack Americans and their Allies in whatever way they can, as indicated by the rise in terrorist attacks on American and Allied targets. I believe a better way to stop this than unilaterally taking down an Arab country or two is to get more of our powerful Allies to work with us against the problem. The Bush approach alienates many allies so that they sit idly by as we increase our size on the dartboard. I don't feel safer than I did in 2001 or 1993. But then, I am also not so afraid of another attack that I stop shopping at WalMart. I go on with my life, being a bit more suspicious and attentive, but mostly just happy to still be free, despite the best attempts of my all-powerful Government. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 03:26 PM |
| AOPA credit card --- WARNING. | RS | Owning | 340 | December 9th 04 06:04 AM |
| AOPA VISA card fraud via XM Radio? | Dan Luke | Piloting | 5 | July 5th 04 07:38 PM |
| AOPA and ATC Privatization | Chip Jones | Piloting | 133 | November 12th 03 09:26 PM |
| AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 02:27 PM |