![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 16, 5:32 pm, "Vaughn Simon"
wrote: wrote in message ups.com... Just wondering how similar these two ships are to fly. Performance numbers seem to be in the same neighborhood. I've been flying our club's 1-34 and have gotten comfortable with it. What should I expect if I were to step into the 2-32? In certain respects, particularly energy management in the pattern, the 1-34 and the 2-32 are very similar. To me, flying a 2-32 is much like driving around in a big 'ole 1969 Caddy. It can be a comfortable experience, you have plenty of room in the cockpit, you have a cushy ride, you have that 1960's ambience, but don't expect it to handle like a sports car because that ain't what it is. On final the 2-32 can be really fun, pull the spoilers all the way out and you suddenly have about the same L/D as a real 1969 Caddy. Growing up in the 'burbs in the 70's, we had a name for something like a 1969 Caddy. The term was "road sofa." In some respects, that's how I view the 2-32. I especially love the trim wheel; if there were a throttle I'd swear I was in a light twin :-) Someone else mentioned the divebrakes. That's also a real hoot. I watched the local ride pilot turn short final at about 800 feet this past Sunday into a 20kt headwind. Popped out the boards and pushed the nose over to about 80kts indicated. L/D approximates a set of car keys. Down and stopped on the runway in a couple hundred feet. Can't really do that in an LS1. P3 |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Our pilots who are competent in the K21 have no problem transitioning to
the 102 or the LS4, with a proper briefing. Be sure you are briefed by a CFIG who flies a CG hook equipped glider on aerotow. The K21s have a CG hook but it is possible to burn the rope in two by the nosewheel--we tried it a few times and gave up! Having flown the 1-34, SGS 2-32, Grob 103 and LS4. I would not think the 2-32 to be a good transition trainer. If your option is the K-21.. then yes.. a far better choice. We use our club G103 to transition our pilots to our LS4. The pilots must be Grob 103 PIC qualified with consistent landings before transition to single seat glass. We put the single seat glass candidate in the back seat and use the CG hook. We carefully brief the tendency to "catch the rope twix tire and pavement" if the nose is allowed to drop once picked up. We have never burned a rope, but that does not mean we won't. Slack line recoveries really feel different with the CG hook, and the point is well made to get the nose pointed at tow before the rope comes taught. Also pilots are not used to seeing the rope off to the side.. so we go left and right "across the top of the box" to let them see that.. also dropping down one side of the "box" to really see the rope impresses the "pay attention and stay put on tow". 2-33s, 2-32s, 1-34s and even the Grob 103 require the nose to be picked up early in the take off, counter productive for "tail wheel glass" single seaters.. the hardest part is getting the new LS pilot to "relax" back pressure on take off to allow the tail to rise and let the LS "fly off".. holding the stick back causes the LS to JUMP into the air at too slow a speed, and then the pilot is PIO to keep from over ballooning while waiting for the tow to lift off. BT CFIG and TOW |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 16, 6:13 pm, "Bill Daniels" bildan@comcast-dot-net wrote:
"Ralph Jones" wrote in message ... On Mon, 16 Jul 2007 10:41:47 -0700, wrote: Your responses are interesting. The reason I posted this question is because it was recommended (by a CFIG and former LS1f owner) that the 2-32 would be a good ship to use for transitioning to my new (to me) LS1f. It doesn't sound like it will handle much like the LS1f. I've spoken to many current and former LS1f drivers, and they all tell the same story regarding it's handling. Light, responsive, excellent control harmony, docile and a joy to fly. This doesn't sound like your descriptions of how the 2-32 flies. The things I'm most concerned about climbing into the LS1f is the CG tow hook (take-offs) and energy management during the landing phase. My own approach to transition was to get some time in a G103 or an ASK21. What do you guys think? 2-32, or something glass like the 103 or 21? Thanks. OK, that puts a different perspective on it. As I said, the transition to a 2-32 is easy -- too easy if glass is your destination. Better to go to a Grob 103. I didn't know there were any 2-32's left in rental/club service...last I heard, a chain of tourist ride operations had bought up the whole 2-32 fleet. Lots of clubs, including mine, skinned them pretty good on the price...;-) rj None of the Schweizers are a good transition trainers to an LS-3. In fact, they may introduce habits that would be counterproductive. If you plan to fly glass, avoid them. The LS-3 is a docile, pleasant handling glider with plenty of performance. If you can fly any of the glass 2-seaters comfortably, you will not likely have any problems. The CG hook and flaps are the only complications. If you have been trained from the beginning on aero-tow, you may not notice the CG hook but be careful to stay in position behind the tug - if you get seriously out of position, you WILL notice the CG hook. The flaps just make the glider more pleasant to fly. Get a good briefing from someone who had flown the glider and go have fun. Bill Daniels A pilot here in Colorado recently bought an LS-3 that had been based in Moriarty. When I brought him the tow rope, I found it had been fitted with an Applebay Zuni 'chin' hook. Nice addition to a glider that will be frequently flown from sites that frequently get some squirrelly crosswinds. Frank Whiteley |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
(snip)A pilot here in Colorado recently bought an LS-3 that had been based
in Moriarty. When I brought him the tow rope, I found it had been fitted with an Applebay Zuni 'chin' hook. Nice addition to a glider that will be frequently flown from sites that frequently get some squirrelly crosswinds. Frank Whiteley (snip) What is a chin hook? Thanks, Bagger |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks to all for your input. I am now in the process of scheduling
time in an ASK21. If that doesn't work out, then it's on to a G103 as a "plan b". Dave |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 17, 3:39 am, bagmaker
wrote: (snip)A pilot here in Colorado recently bought an LS-3 that had been based in Moriarty. When I brought him the tow rope, I found it had been fitted with an Applebay Zuni 'chin' hook. Nice addition to a glider that will be frequently flown from sites that frequently get some squirrelly crosswinds. Frank Whiteley (snip) What is a chin hook? Thanks, Bagger -- bagmaker Just a term to differentiate the position from a true nose hook, like on a Grob, Kestrel, and many others. Usually fitted about 18-36 inches back under the nose, depending on the glider. On my LAK-12, the forward hook is just ahead of the panel pedestal, more a chin than nose position. On the LS-3 in question, the Applebay hook was about 24" back from the nose. Last time I checked they were much less expensive than a TOST refit and some number of western US based gliders have them. Plus they fit flush after release. I've been told the Applebay hook is very similar to the Schreder hook on most of the HP series. Frank Whiteley |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi all. Just thought I'd post an update. I went to another operation
to fly their G103 in an effort to help me transition to my LS1f. I was fortunate enough to fly with Judy Ruprecht. She was very helpful with some ground instruction and descriptions of what I should expect when in the air. I really enjoyed flying with her. I think this will help make my upcoming check-ride much less nerve-racking now that I know her a little. Anyway, it turns out the G103 is a rather benign and forgiving ship. After a few minutes, I was pretty comfortable with it. We did some slow-speed/stall work in straight and turning flight and the stall characteristics are pretty docile. Did a little soaring with it too, and without audio. All I had was the mechanical vario, and I was able to scratch back up to release altitude with it. I've never flown without audio before. Flying at a new location for the first time was the only real challenge, but that wasn't all that bad. About the only thing that really stands out in my mind from yesterday is the feel of more mass on landing. I had no problem on approach and landing other than not holding off quite enough to get the two-point touch. I pretty much greased the landing, but it was on the main wheel. Judy made a couple of pattern adjustment suggestions mostly due to my unfamiliarity with the field. The one bit of handling advice I got was to watch my speed in the pattern. I slowed just a bit on base while looking outside at my angles. She was more concerned about flaring too slow and landing hard and made a comment about not slowing down any further. But I easily picked up the pace a bit before we were finished with base and the rest of the landing went well. Oh yeah, there's a damned tree just to the right of the approach end of runway 7 that seems really close. My instinct was to stay away from it, but that would have had me aligned with runway lights under the left wing tip (we were landing on 7R, grass). So after a quick suggestion from Judy, I moved over towards the tree anyway rather than waiting until I got by it. As I said, I had more problems with the strange field than I did with the ship. Anyhow, the 103 really is an easy ship to fly. I had myself psyched about nothing. Dave |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Wanted - Borgelt B50, Ilec SB-8 or similar | [email protected] | Soaring | 1 | August 19th 05 03:20 PM |
BD-5 or similar? | Mark Zivley | Home Built | 6 | May 11th 05 02:06 PM |
in case you have seen similar versions of this use this one its safe | vamuse | Home Built | 1 | February 12th 05 01:54 AM |
IAF F-16 equipped with LANTIRN or similar ? | John S. Shinal | Military Aviation | 4 | September 25th 04 02:26 AM |
Tossing factory EGT, replacing with JPI or similar | Ben Jackson | Owning | 28 | April 8th 04 02:44 PM |