A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Naval Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Russian Air Force may receive fifth-generation fighter in 2013



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 15th 08, 11:05 PM posted to rec.aviation.military,rec.aviation.military.naval,sci.military.naval
Vaughn Simon
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 735
Default Russian Air Force may receive fifth-generation fighter in 2013


"David E. Powell" wrote in message
...

Outspend em again?


That will probably never happen again. Russia is quickly becoming an
important oil exporter.

Vaughn


  #2  
Old July 18th 08, 07:50 AM posted to rec.aviation.military,rec.aviation.military.naval,sci.military.naval
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 5
Default Russian Air Force may receive fifth-generation fighter in 2013

Outspend em again
in general, term "expensive" does not mean the best one

we already have had G5 thing to try long time ago

see, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6R2lm2QzCp8

Kind russian regards,
Yuri

www.testpilots.ru
  #3  
Old July 18th 08, 01:15 PM posted to rec.aviation.military,rec.aviation.military.naval,sci.military.naval
Eunometic
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 65
Default Russian Air Force may receive fifth-generation fighter in 2013

On Jul 18, 4:50 pm, wrote:
Outspend em again


in general, term "expensive" does not mean the best one

we already have had G5 thing to try long time ago

see,http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6R2lm2QzCp8

Kind russian regards,
Yuri

www.testpilots.ru


Although I can respect the impressive engineering in the MiG 1.42, Su
27/37 series, S.47 I can not take them seriously as
5th generation fighters. They are barely 4th generation aircraft.
They are barely and improvement over the F-15.

The Americans have with the F22 produced an air superiority fighter
that is vastly superior to anything else in the
world whether that be French, European or CIS or Russian. By vastly
superior I mean that the kill ratio will be
in favour of the F-22 by a very large margin.

This is easy to understand, the F-22 will detect any opposing aircraft
first, it will then be able to fire a missile first and destroy the it
enemy in large numbers. Modern missiles are quite reliable.

The Russian officers and engineers who set out to produce the MiG 1.42
and S.47 and Su 37 set out to produce an aircraft better than the 35
year old F-15. They succeeded in producing a slightly better aircraft
in some areas.

The USAF strategists and engineers who created the F-22 produced a
completely new concept that makes irrelevant these old ideas.

What the Mikoyan and Sukhoi have succeeded in producing are aircraft
that have the same thrust to weight ratio as the F-15 and the same
armament levels but better instantaneous turn rates due to more
complicated aerodynamics, possibly they have smaller radar signatures
but only by a small amount (a reduction by a factor of 10 is
insignificant). These so called 5th generation aircraft are only
slightly better than the 35 year old F-15. When the F-15 is upgraded
with modern radar (eg AESA) and missiles there is little better about
the new Soviet fighters except better dog fighting though there climb
rates and acceleration is likely to be little better. I understand
that the Russian or CIS short range missiles have evolved exceptional
maneuverability. The F-22 is designed to destroy its opponents well
before a dogfight can occur. I'm sure if a dogfight does occur the
F-22 with its truly exceptional thrust to weight ratio and very high
cruise speed will do very well.

In seeking to produce their own stealth fighters the Russian air force
has acknowledged this.

Attempts to produce stealth defeating radars based in impulses or bi
static principles will loose much of their effectiveness in the
presence of simple noise jamming.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
New Russian fighter...wow! Ricky Piloting 25 March 21st 08 01:42 AM
New Russian Fighter? [email protected] Piloting 9 March 15th 08 01:13 PM
What is a nth Generation fighter? Tom Nealon Military Aviation 64 December 17th 03 10:18 PM
Russian Fighter Book Charles Talleyrand Military Aviation 11 September 13th 03 08:21 PM
Joint Russian-French 5th generation fighter? lihakirves Military Aviation 1 July 5th 03 01:36 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:34 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.