![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Alan Minyard" wrote in message ... On Sun, 30 May 2004 21:36:23 -0400, "Kyle Boatright" wrote: "Bob Urz" wrote in message ... I know similar scenarios were made into a movie. But, if on Dec 1941 you had two strike eagles. Only two. Your sortie arrived at the Japanese fleet about the time 1/2 of the first wave was launched. Question 1# given the choice of any weaponry available for the F15, (even some that may not be normally used) what would your weapon load be? This is using all available hard points and taking fuel out of the equation. Question #2 Given the choice of weapons above, what would your tactics be to maximize damage to the carrier fleet and prevent as many planes as possible from reaching Pearl. (while saving your own butt) Now there would have to be a balance between destroying the carriers from future use and destroying the attacking planes that have already left the carrier. Have it it. Hang as much on the plane as you can. But when your out of munitions, what other tactics could you use? Bob I carry 4x cluster bombs per aircraft (just in case I miss with one or two), and all the sidewinders and 20mm the F-15 will haul. I'm hitting the carriers with cluster bombs, which ought to do a number on any aircraft and people on deck. The secondaries from the Japanese munitions will finish the job on the carriers. Once the carriers are lit up like the 4th of July, I take out bombers and torpedo planes until I exhaust my supply of sidewinders. Following that, I go plinking with 20 mm. I don't waste my time shooting up Zero's unless there is nothing else to shoot at. KB AIM 9s at recips?? I doubt if you would ever get a tone. Al Minyard If they can get head on shots at jets based on airframe heating, I presume they can see hot exhaust stacks and other hot spots on recips. I don't claim to be particularly knowledgable about IR missiles (or any missiles, for that matter), so it would be great if someone more knowledgable could jump in... KB |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , Alan Minyard
writes AIM 9s at recips?? I doubt if you would ever get a tone. Certainly would. Even the original seeker (uncooled lead sulphide, really basic) would track a flashlight or a lit cigarette, and the exhausts and propellers of 900hp recips are *hot*. By the time you're up to AIM-9L or thereabouts, you should be able to get a workable acquisition on a reciprocating engine unless the background clutter's hateful (and this would be over ocean, in good weather, with the attacker choosing altitude and aspect at leisure) -- He thinks too much: such men are dangerous. Julius Caesar I:2 Paul J. Adam MainBoxatjrwlynch[dot]demon{dot}co(.)uk |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bob Urz" wrote in message ... I know similar scenarios were made into a movie. But, if on Dec 1941 you had two strike eagles. Only two. Your sortie arrived at the Japanese fleet about the time 1/2 of the first wave was launched. Question 1# given the choice of any weaponry available for the F15, (even some that may not be normally used) what would your weapon load be? This is using all available hard points and taking fuel out of the equation. B61's, and as many AIM-9/AIM-120's we could carry. Question #2 Given the choice of weapons above, what would your tactics be to maximize damage to the carrier fleet and prevent as many planes as possible from reaching Pearl. (while saving your own butt) Vaporize the carriers, then chase down and destroy as many of the already launched planes as we have missiles/20MM for. Now there would have to be a balance between destroying the carriers from future use and destroying the attacking planes that have already left the carrier. Have it it. Hang as much on the plane as you can. But when your out of munitions, what other tactics could you use? Full AB to Pearl, land, taxi to the HQ building. A couple of full AB runups should get the duty officers attention. Pete |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Pete wrote: "Bob Urz" wrote in message ... I know similar scenarios were made into a movie. But, if on Dec 1941 you had two strike eagles. Only two. Your sortie arrived at the Japanese fleet about the time 1/2 of the first wave was launched. Question 1# given the choice of any weaponry available for the F15, (even some that may not be normally used) what would your weapon load be? This is using all available hard points and taking fuel out of the equation. B61's, and as many AIM-9/AIM-120's we could carry. Question #2 Given the choice of weapons above, what would your tactics be to maximize damage to the carrier fleet and prevent as many planes as possible from reaching Pearl. (while saving your own butt) Vaporize the carriers, then chase down and destroy as many of the already launched planes as we have missiles/20MM for. Now there would have to be a balance between destroying the carriers from future use and destroying the attacking planes that have already left the carrier. Have it it. Hang as much on the plane as you can. But when your out of munitions, what other tactics could you use? Full AB to Pearl, land, taxi to the HQ building. A couple of full AB runups should get the duty officers attention. Pete Although i agree the nukes are a "finisher", i was thinking more along the lines of conventional weapons to make it more interesting. Would a agm-65 be usable in this situation? laser guided bombs certainly would. Someone suggested a cluster bomb, but how would you target it on a moving target? And i believe the gun has 450 rounds capacity? That would not allow much of a squirt per zero. And given the zero has superior low speed maneuverability, how would you approach the gun shots? Bob -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bob Urz" wrote Although i agree the nukes are a "finisher", i was thinking more along the lines of conventional weapons to make it more interesting. Would a agm-65 be usable in this situation? laser guided bombs certainly would. At this point, all we need to do is kill the flight deck, and disable as many unlaunched planes as we can. AGM-65 is probably too small to be effective. F-15E can carry 8x500 lb (GBU-12 or MK-82). Use those. 2 ea holes in the flight deck would take it out of action. Someone suggested a cluster bomb, but how would you target it on a moving target? It's not moving that fast. Targeting wouldn't be that hard (lead it a little) The bomblets would be enough to disable some/most of the aircraft on deck, but maybe not enough to take the flight deck out of operation. And i believe the gun has 450 rounds capacity? That would not allow much of a squirt per zero. And given the zero has superior low speed maneuverability, how would you approach the gun shots? From behind. Pick them off one by one. If you're lucky, you'll get a few before the guys in front notice. Once they DO notice, leave and call the cavalry. You're vastly outnumbered. Notification is more important than trying to get "just one more". Pete Knowing what we know now, I still maintain that with an unrestricted weapons load, B61 is the only way to go. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Pete" wrote in message ... "Bob Urz" wrote Although i agree the nukes are a "finisher", i was thinking more along the lines of conventional weapons to make it more interesting. Would a agm-65 be usable in this situation? laser guided bombs certainly would. At this point, all we need to do is kill the flight deck, and disable as many unlaunched planes as we can. AGM-65 is probably too small to be effective. F-15E can carry 8x500 lb (GBU-12 or MK-82). Use those. 2 ea holes in the flight deck would take it out of action. Much too short sighted. You want to kill all of the Japanese CVs. Otherwise, a few hours later, the deck is patched and they're back in operation. At the worst, all six would be back in business for the battles of 1942. Since the Japanese CVs weren't armored to speak of, a GBU-10 with a Mk-84 warhead should be the basic CV ship-killer. Two F-15Es should nail all six CVs with one bomb per and an extra pair as backup and coup d'gras. I'd nail all CVs and then pull back to maximum endurance loiter and observe Japanese damage control efforts. At Bingo, either donate the remaining ordnance to the CVs in best shape or retire to one of the undamaged fields on Oahu and try and talk the duty officer out of twenty thousand pounds of kerosene to go back and finish the job. But that wouldn't be likely to succeed. This is tough, because a single bomb is really marginal against a large ship. If the magazines were the aimpoint (with Google handy so that the WSO could look it up for each ship) then the chances of sinking with a single bomb goes up. Otherwise, a hit aft could put all four screws and possibly rudders out of service. The ships killed at Midway were caught with all manner of munitions and avgas available to help things along because of the conflict between finishing off the Midway garrison and killing the US carriers. It's unlikely that the Pearl Harbor strike would be that sloppy. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 31 May 2004 17:15:50 -0400, "Paul F Austin"
wrote: This is tough, because a single bomb is really marginal against a large ship. If the magazines were the aimpoint (with Google handy so that the WSO could look it up for each ship) then the chances of sinking with a single bomb goes up. Otherwise, a hit aft could put all four screws and possibly rudders out of service. The ships killed at Midway were caught with all manner of munitions and avgas available to help things along because of the conflict between finishing off the Midway garrison and killing the US carriers. It's unlikely that the Pearl Harbor strike would be that sloppy. I'd put the initial LGB hit aft, so that it takes out the landing area - almost as good as killing the CVs would be killing most of the Kido Butai. After all the Japanese were distinctly average after their seasoned pilots were lost. Peter Kemp |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Paul F Austin" wrote Much too short sighted. You want to kill all of the Japanese CVs. Otherwise, a few hours later, the deck is patched and they're back in operation. A few hours later, you have gone to Pearl, and notified HQ of the deal. At the worst, all six would be back in business for the battles of 1942. Since the Japanese CVs weren't armored to speak of, a GBU-10 with a Mk-84 warhead should be the basic CV ship-killer. Two F-15Es should nail all six CVs with one bomb per and an extra pair as backup and coup d'gras. I'd nail all CVs and then pull back to maximum endurance loiter and observe Japanese damage control efforts. Remember, 1/2 the attack force is already on the way. You need to slow them down as much as possible. At Bingo, either donate the remaining ordnance to the CVs in best shape or retire to one of the undamaged fields on Oahu and try and talk the duty officer out of twenty thousand pounds of kerosene to go back and finish the job. But that wouldn't be likely to succeed. This is tough, because a single bomb is really marginal against a large ship. Which is why I thought 16 MK-82 vs 8 MK-84. Smaller warhead, yes, but more hits. The real question is, can 2 Strike Eagles sink all 6 carriers? Maybe, maybe not. There are only two of you, with limited ordnance. Slow them down as much as possible until you can shake things up at Pearl. Pete |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Paul F Austin" wrote in message .. . At Bingo, either donate the remaining ordnance to the CVs in best shape or retire to one of the undamaged fields on Oahu and try and talk the duty officer out of twenty thousand pounds of kerosene to go back and finish the job. But that wouldn't be likely to succeed. Would a 1941-era fuel truck be able to get gas into a F-15E? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|