![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Andrew Gideon" wrote in message
online.com... 150 went straight into an empty school That's going to cost us. Possibly. Especially when the evening news is putting up an aerial photo and pointing out all the stuff in the photo that the 150 "narrowly missed". Of course, they failed to point out that each object they circled was a very tiny target in a vast area of non-targets. Even in a relatively congested area where this accident happened, the odds of the 150 hitting a person were remarkably small. This was on the KIRO evening news, by the way. George commented that "that reporter seems to know his or her stuff". Since he didn't refer to a specific article, I don't know which reporter he's referring to; probably Rick Price though, and yes...he's their "aviation correspondent" and does have an above-average knowledge of things related to aviation. But that doesn't stop the rest of their crew from stupid reporting. And yes, I blame (at least in part) stupid reporting for some of general aviation's woes. Pete |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I would guess that an FAA-employed controller would be in a better position
to answer that question than I am. I do know that ground operations at Renton differ from what almost all student pilots are taught about operations at a controlled airport. Bob Gardner "Dan Foster" wrote in message ... In article , Bob Gardner wrote: Tower-controlled airport, BTW. A contract tower, not an FAA tower. I have to ask, just out of curiosity... does that make any particular difference or is of any noteworthy mention, other than what agency directly signs the employees' paychecks? -Dan |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Bob Gardner wrote: I would guess that an FAA-employed controller would be in a better position to answer that question than I am. Makes no difference whatsoever. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Peter Duniho wrote:
George commented that "that reporter seems to know his or her stuff". Sorry. I meant this one. http://www.kirotv.com/news/4813756/detail.html George Patterson Give a person a fish and you feed him for a day; teach a person to use the Internet and he won't bother you for weeks. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The AP report is very sensible.
This accident reminds me of last week's thread about spotting floatplanes over Lake Sammamish. In this case the Cessna was in the pattern for Renton and looking into the sun -- but the Beaver was in a separate pattern for Wiley Post, the seaplane base off the north end of the Renton runway. Both of these guys should have been talking to the tower and the tower should have been watching out for both of them. Seth N8100R "Bob Gardner" wrote in message ... Oh yeah. We had 0.7 inches of rain in July, and none since the first of August...the next week or ten days are forecast to be dry, too. Bob Gardner wrote in message ups.com... Oh, Boy and this is rainy Seattle. Makes the M..gs closure look sounder every day. Uncle Bobby RIP. And that was SPLAT into a SCHOOL BUILDING. Polarized sunglasses anyone? JG |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Seth Masia wrote:
This accident reminds me of last week's thread about spotting floatplanes over Lake Sammamish. In this case the Cessna was in the pattern for Renton and looking into the sun -- but the Beaver was in a separate pattern for Wiley Post, the seaplane base off the north end of the Renton runway. Both of these guys should have been talking to the tower and the tower should have been watching out for both of them. According to the TV link posted, both aircraft were talking to the tower. George Patterson Give a person a fish and you feed him for a day; teach a person to use the Internet and he won't bother you for weeks. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Makes the M..gs closure look sounder
every day. How? Why? Wait, don't bother. Oh, and tell me again how many people in the school were hurt. -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I do know that ground operations at
Renton differ from what almost all student pilots are taught about operations at a controlled airport. How so? I'm going to Renton in September. Jose -- Quantum Mechanics is like this: God =does= play dice with the universe, except there's no God, and there's no dice. And maybe there's no universe. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"George Patterson" wrote in message
news ![]() Sorry. I meant this one. http://www.kirotv.com/news/4813756/detail.html Hmmm...well, the only KIRO reported identified by name is indeed Rick Price. If it was his comments to which you referred, I'd have to agree. ![]() |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Seth Masia" wrote in message
... The AP report is very sensible. This accident reminds me of last week's thread about spotting floatplanes over Lake Sammamish. Was it that recent? Wow...time flies. ![]() In this case the Cessna was in the pattern for Renton and looking into the sun -- but the Beaver was in a separate pattern for Wiley Post, the seaplane base off the north end of the Renton runway. For what it's worth, IMHO this was much more like a "multiple planes at a point of congestion" (a towered airport, in this case) than it is like the previous thread about planes around Lake Sammamish. The towered airport specifically attracts planes to the same spot (even one like Renton where there are two landing surfaces), while in the case of operations over an urban lake like Sammamish, landplane traffic really ought to be above 1000' above the lake (especially when the lake itself is bordered by developed hills of 200-300'), while the seaplane traffic operating at the lake is likely to be 1000' or below. And of course, over an urban lake there is not nearly the same kind of predefined pattern that would attract to airplanes specifically to the same spot as one would find at an airport. Both of these guys should have been talking to the tower and the tower should have been watching out for both of them. Both of those guys were talking to the tower (according to the news report), and yes the tower should have been helping them avoid each other, but the tower's primary responsibility is to control use of the runway, not the air around the runway. It sounds as though the sun might have been a factor, but I also wonder whether either pilot had been paying attention to radio transmissions to or from the other aircraft, for the purpose of developing a good sense of awareness of other traffic in the vicinity. And of course, the sun should only have been a factor for one of the pilots at most. That said, reports as to what exactly happened are still conflicting. The evening news was reporting that the 150 was flying perpendicular to the flight path of the floatplane, while the web site's article appears to be saying that the flight paths were nearly parallel, in the same direction. It probably will be months (or a year) before the NTSB report comes out and gives us anything close to accurate information as to what actually happened. Pete |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Boeing Boondoggle | Larry Dighera | Military Aviation | 77 | September 15th 04 02:39 AM |
Parachute saves light plane's passengers | randall g | Piloting | 0 | April 9th 04 07:42 PM |
The light bulb | Greasy Rider | Military Aviation | 6 | March 2nd 04 12:07 PM |