![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Our club has been operating on the grass immediately adjacent to the
paved runway for about 20 or 25 years now at KHRJ, Harnett County Airport, North Carolina. We take off from the paved runway and the towplane will land on the paved runway while the gliders will usually land on the grass. If there is no power traffic around, the glider may elect to land on the pavement. We try not to interfere with power traffic operation. All power traffic flies a standard left-hand pattern while gliders make right traffic. Seems to work quite well. Our club also pays to have the grass cut for the portion of grass we use. The county cuts the grass, too, but only about four times per year. We cut it every other week. Some conventional-geared airplanes make use of our grass "runways." I don't know of a written letter of agreement; just a "gentleman's agreement" between the club and the FBO. Ray Lovinggood Carrboro, North Carolina, USA |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 14, 8:40*am, wrote:
I'm posting this to see if we can help a friend. *If you can please drop her a line at WalkerCL at AOL.com If you received this email from me then you are a friend to me and/or a general aviation and soaring. I am asking you to help me, please. * I have been and am presently fighting a battle for glider operations at Midway Regional (JWY) a Class E Airport. I have an appointment to speak to the Director of the Southwest Region, Airports Division. He is the person in charge of making a ruling on this matter. He has requested that I bring an example of a Letter of Agreement between any FSDO (Flight Standards District Office) and any operator having surface operations on other than the hard surface runway. Glider operations would be great, but balloon operations, ultralight, or parachute operations would be wonderful as well. Anything, as long as the ground operations are outside of the hard surface runway. I have researched on my computer until my eyes are bad. Please help me. Think of anywhere you know of where they are operating or staging within 250' of the runway. Do they have an LOA? Can we access that? * I would not ask for your help if there was any other way. Please see what you can find and help me with this. I am sorry to be asking for this, but I am grateful for your help. Yours, Carol The Smoky Mountain Soaring Association has been flying out of Downtown Island Airport (DKX in Knoxville, TN) for years. The gliders stage at one end of the paved runway on the grass, then push out and tow off the pavement when the power traffic is clear. We land on the grass between the runway and taxiways so as not to block the runway for the power traffic. The towplane drops the rope and lands on the grass right beside the paved runway, also. To my knowledge there is no "formal" written agreement with the airport management, nor with the FSDO in Nashville. As licensed pilots operating certificated aircraft out of an airport receiving federal funding, we probably must be allowed to fly off the runways, but we stay in the grass to avoid inconveniencing other aircraft. This argument has been successful in the past when a long-gone, heavy-iron FBO tried to get the airport authority to ban us with the ultralights. So far, common courtesy and common sense have prevailed. Don |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 14, 5:24*pm, "BT" wrote:
I do not believe that FSDO would get involved in this manner. It is more an agreement or arrangement between the airport operator (local civil owner) and the club. The FSDO "might" have some papers between them and that airport owner / operator. There are clubs in the Northeast that operate on grass next to a paved runway but I do not know the distances involved, surely it is less than 250ft. I find it interesting that you refer to the airport as a Class E airport. Are you referring to the "airspace designation" over the airport? I see where JWY is actually in Class G airspace with Class E beginning (proposed altitude at 700ft AGL) above the airport. There is a proposal to change the Class E airspace configuration to accommodate new SIAP into the airport. But the airport itself still remains in Class B airspace. Is the airport manager attempting to restrict your operations at the airport? Is there any reason you cannot operate from the paved surface? Local powered traffic too busy to accommodate a launch or recovery? Can you land on pavement and roll clear into the grass? BT wrote in message ... I'm posting this to see if we can help a friend. *If you can please drop her a line at WalkerCL at AOL.com If you received this email from me then you are a friend to me and/or a general aviation and soaring. I am asking you to help me, please. *I have been and am presently fighting a battle for glider operations at Midway Regional (JWY) a Class E Airport. I have an appointment to speak to the Director of the Southwest Region, Airports Division. He is the person in charge of making a ruling on this matter. He has requested that I bring an example of a Letter of Agreement between any FSDO (Flight Standards District Office) and any operator having surface operations on other than the hard surface runway. Glider operations would be great, but balloon operations, ultralight, or parachute operations would be wonderful as well. Anything, as long as the ground operations are outside of the hard surface runway. I have researched on my computer until my eyes are bad. Please help me. Think of anywhere you know of where they are operating or staging within 250' of the runway. Do they have an LOA? Can we access that? *I would not ask for your help if there was any other way. Please see what you can find and help me with this. I am sorry to be asking for this, but I am grateful for your help. Yours, Carol And of course if other operations don't have a letter of agreement but operate in such a manner and they are pointed out to the FAA then don't be shocked if that FAA representative asking for the LOA checks with his peers at those other airports to see what is up. I have nothing against the FAA enforcing rules, but just remember where volunteering information or asking the wrong questions might get you (Mmm Pegasus 3,000 hour limit, FCC radio fines in Texas, for starters). Darryl |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 15, 2:19*pm, Darryl Ramm wrote:
On Oct 14, 5:24*pm, "BT" wrote: I do not believe that FSDO would get involved in this manner. It is more an agreement or arrangement between the airport operator (local civil owner) and the club. The FSDO "might" have some papers between them and that airport owner / operator. There are clubs in the Northeast that operate on grass next to a paved runway but I do not know the distances involved, surely it is less than 250ft. I find it interesting that you refer to the airport as a Class E airport. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
From the posts I see hear it sounds to me like the appropriate
response is "from my research there is no such thing as a LOA for glider operations at airports., Why do you think there is such a thing?" It would seem that it should be the persin requesting it's responsibilty to provide and example of it and where it is used. It seems very common in aviation circles for people to try to make up requirements that don't exist, just because they think it would be a good idea. Brian |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 14, 8:12*am, Tony wrote:
On Oct 14, 7:40*am, wrote: I'm posting this to see if we can help a friend. *If you can please drop her a line at WalkerCL at AOL.com If you received this email from me then you are a friend to me and/or a general aviation and soaring. I am asking you to help me, please. * I have been and am presently fighting a battle for glider operations at Midway Regional (JWY) a Class E Airport. I have an appointment to speak to the Director of the Southwest Region, Airports Division. He is the person in charge of making a ruling on this matter. He has requested that I bring an example of a Letter of Agreement between any FSDO (Flight Standards District Office) and any operator having surface operations on other than the hard surface runway. Glider operations would be great, but balloon operations, ultralight, or parachute operations would be wonderful as well. Anything, as long as the ground operations are outside of the hard surface runway. I have researched on my computer until my eyes are bad. Please help me. Think of anywhere you know of where they are operating or staging within 250' of the runway. Do they have an LOA? Can we access that? * I would not ask for your help if there was any other way. Please see what you can find and help me with this. I am sorry to be asking for this, but I am grateful for your help. Yours, Carol I know of glider operations that routinely land and sometimes takeoff using grassy areas next to runways. *I've never heard of anyone needing to get a Letter of Agreement with the FAA for these types of ops. *I guess to me it was always common sense. *The glider clubs use that area more or less at their own risk but they know the condition and it keeps gliders out of the way of power traffic. *I guess we always figured you didn't need an LOA for common sense...sorry that you've gotten to this point. The following is from the public records. The airport board was willing to assist the glider operations, special meeting May 2009. "Glider Operations: Andy Biery had a two hour discussion with the Board concerning glider operations at the Airport. The issue was stationary objects in the runway safety area while other airplanes take off and land. Andy read the Board some information from the FAA’s Guide to Sponsor Obligations for Airport Compliance, Assurances for Airport Sponsors and the Airport’s Rules and Regulations which relate to the subject discussed. Bill Gunn from TxDOT presented the Board with some relevant information on the situation. After lengthy deliberation over the issue, the Board was in agreement that operating off of the grass is a safer option for right now opposed to operating off of the asphalt runway. The intent of the Board is to fix the Object Free Area by having culverts placed in the drainage ditch on the east side of the runway so that the gliders and the equipment can be moved past the Object Free Area. The Board agreed this should be done during the runway construction phase because it will save money by using the dirt from the runway expansion project as fill for the culvert project. As suggested by Bill Gunn, Carol Walker volunteered to contact Frank Fortmann with the San Antonio FSDO, to see if she can get a copy of the written agreement that they had come up with for glider operations at Castroville. Also, it was suggested that other Airports in a similar situation be contacted to see if they might provide a copy of the standing letter of agreement with the FAA. Even though the Board was aware that making the motion would be going against the Airport’s written rules and regulations and the obligations to the FAA, four out of the five members present were in agreement that it was best to bend the rules for safety reasons until a permanent fix can be made. Paula Baucum motioned to approve moving the glider operations back to the grassy area and readdress the issue at the next Board meeting. Also, any operation that will be occurring east of the runway, including glider operations, must provide written plans prior to beginning their operations. Those currently operating there, including the glider operations, will be given twenty-four hours to submit their plans: second by Aubrey Price and carried by a vote of 4-1 with Glynn Hall voting in opposition." http://www.mid-wayregional.com/board...pecialmins.pdf However, this appeared in the July board minutes. "Aubrey Price made a motion that in light of the email dated June 11, 2009 from Steven Cook, Program Manager of the Airport Division, FAA, to Bill Gunn, TxDOT, all aircraft operating out of Mid-Way Airport must comply with the FAA Order 5200.8 which says that the Airport must have the 250 feet clearance in the runway safety area; second by George Kent and carried by a vote of 5 members with Glynn Hall abstaining from a vote." http://www.mid-wayregional.com/board...July09mins.pdf FAA Southwest Region, including Texas ADO contacts and others are http://www.faa.gov/airports/southwest/about_airports/ Some RSA data points http://www.faa.gov/airports/resource...ion_5200_8.pdf http://www.faa.gov/airports/southern...a_brochure.pdf http://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/m...50_5300_13.pdf , page21. JWY doesn't appear to be certificated for any group or Part 139 use. As of 10/22/2009, the airport manager [Andy Biery] is listed as an interim appointment. I heard through Dave Newill 2-3 years ago that the FAA standard for hard and grass surfaces on a particular runway designation disappeared sometime in the 1980's. I wouldn't see anything wrong with this under current guidance as long as there's an RSA outside of the grass use area for staging and recovery. At JWY, the grass is 250ft from the hard surface to the drainage ditch. That's the rub I think. Looking at the airport from Google earth, improvements don't seem to indicate that the grass was part of the runway designation, but as Dave Newill suggests, check the records. I hope that the FAA ADO will agree to a pragmatic solution like a temporary waiver until the drainage project is completed and maybe a grass runway designation. As I understand it, it isn't the use of the grass as a runway that's objectional, but that the grass isn't wide enough to clear the RSA when staging and recovering. When you have both hard and grass surface runways, you can't be doing concurrent operations. Shoot, looks like they could have a 5500ft winch run with over 600ft of land back, if they could make best use of the grass surface. On the other hand, ambitious airport managers often make their bones through 'improvements' which may not be in the best interests of some tenants. Certainly happened at my local city/county airport, still uncontrolled but they sure think they need a tower. Airnav indicates as of 2007 there were four jets at JWY, and four gliders. I've heard from more than one location that jet drivers like straight in approaches and don't like to fly the standard patterns despite the uncontrolled status of the airport. Can't say for sure as I've no experience with such traffic mixed with gliding, but this isn't the first small airport to be on the 'jet center' map. Frank Whiteley |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|