![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 21, 8:30*am, johngalloway wrote:
On Oct 20, 3:59*pm, Richard wrote: On Oct 18, 12:35*pm, johngalloway wrote: Does anyone know whether the LCD display for this unit is transflective or transmissive? Thanks, John Galloway John, Sunlight readabiltiy of a display does not have that much to do with Transflective or Transmissive. The key items a Touchscreen *- extremely bad for *sunlight readabiltiy *produces glare *you can see this on most PDA and or phones. *To see the displays better you have to tilt them to get the correct light on the screen. Coatings on the Screen - coatings depending on the type significantly reduce sunlight glare. * 2 different coatings *are required to have good sunlight readability. Contrast ratio - 11 to 1 Brightness - 1000 -1800 nits (cd/m2) *this backlight will produce a very readable screen. Richardwww.craggyaero.com Richard, *I like SeeYou Mobile and I like much about the Ultimate so if it was smaller, cheaper and I lived in the US I would probably buy one. Why I asked the original question is that most references to the Ipaq 31* series that I have read describe the display as "transmissive" although there are some that describe it as transflective which is how the 4700 display is always described. *I own both types and the displays are clearly different in natu The 4700 display shows up (rather dimly because the observer's pupils are shut down) under direct sunlight and it makes virtually no difference whether the backlight is on or off. *It clearly works in a reflective way. *With the 310 the backlight must be on maximum to be visible at all with the sun on the screen - and reflections mean that the screen is unuseable in that scenario. (Fortunately it is easy to angle the 310 in flight so that condition is rare) On the other hand the 4700 has poorer full backlight brightness than the 310 series and the latter has better visibility in indirect bright sunlight. The AV80R is just about affordable, a familiar size, seems to be brighter than both of the above, runs SYM, *and has the right connectors for integrateing with glider instruments so if it has a transflective screen (as seems likely) then I think it might be worth considering. *Pity about the low resolution however. John Galloway- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Hi John Transmissive / Transflective check it out at http://www.pcmag.com/encyclopedia_te...i=55801,00.asp Bruno |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Bendix/King survey | Jim Burns | Owning | 1 | May 9th 06 03:11 AM |
value of Bendix / King klx100 | mah | Aviation Marketplace | 1 | December 19th 03 03:19 AM |
WTB: Garmin GPSCOM 190 or Bendix/King KLX-100 | Derrick | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | November 27th 03 01:17 PM |
Bendix King GPS Updates | Matthew Waugh | Instrument Flight Rules | 1 | August 5th 03 06:11 PM |
Bendix King GPS Updates | Matthew Waugh | Owning | 1 | August 5th 03 06:11 PM |