![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have always wondered that if the the U.S. and Russia were really
serious about MAD why were boomers ever deployed to the opean seas? Think about it. The Great Lakes are very large and deep, some over 1,000 feet deep. There is no reasonable way I can think of to attack a boomber once out on a patrol in Lake Superior. I mean are the Russians going to smuggle an attack sub in there? No. Use a ship with smuggled in sonar gear and torps? Yeah maybe in a dream. Doing this would probably make boomers far less expensive to design and operate as you probably would not need all the systems a sea going boomer would need. You could probably save on missile design by being able to launch from the surface... Just wondering what some opinions are. JK |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Approaching Deep Stall | Fred the Red Shirt | Piloting | 44 | September 8th 07 01:06 PM |
Car and Deep Cycle Battery FAQ | Bill Darden | Home Built | 0 | May 28th 07 11:57 AM |
Boomers and 40K tailwinds! | Doug Vetter | Piloting | 3 | May 20th 04 02:22 AM |
deep hole | Randall Robertson | Simulators | 9 | April 22nd 04 07:51 PM |
German AUV "Deep C" | robert arndt | Military Aviation | 0 | November 25th 03 04:07 PM |