![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Not to second guess the driver, but if I had just touched down on the deck, and on centerline, but not able to stop - with a soft marsh at the end of the strip..... I'd have just gone along for the ride & NOT bailed out .... had this happen once on an old Lear 35, (lost hydraulics) - but on centerline - the option to bail obviously was missing, but it wasn't "that" dangerous since we knew it was just a grassy field at the end of the runway we'd over run into & not a building or rising terrain. Anyone know why the pilot chose to bail out ? (as opposed to just jettisoning the canopy once they had ditched into the marsh/water). What's the official vs. unwritten understanding among the community regarding the "macho factor" of when to bail out of a jet vs. staying in the jet ? There was an Israeli Air Force Pilot several years ago flying an F-15 (forget what version), during an aerial training exercise, there was a midair collision. His F-15 lost control, he told his rear seater to stand by to eject- then decided to see if he could regain control of the aircraft - by going full throttle, light AB's. He got control of the aircraft back and managed to land it... although at a substantially higher Vref. McDonnell Douglas sent reps out after they saw pictures of the aircraft - and the pilot said during interviews, if he had been aware of the damage he would have bailed out - the entire right wing of that F-15 had been sheared off. What factors would make a Hornet driver, already on the deck, on centerline, knowing a soft marsh was up ahead at the end of the runway, decide to pull that handle ? (vs. just riding it out, and open , or jettison the canopy once stopped). |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/1/04 4:28 PM, in article
, "Allen Epps" wrote: SNIP At least a year ago when I left VAQ-209 (we shared a hangar) , 321 was flying A models so I would guess it just gets sent off to fire fighting school or something and they pull another one from the boneyeard or wherever A's went when the C's hit the fleet (and are now leaving the fleet) Pugs Pugs, I thought all of the USMCR Hornets got ECP-583 A+ upgrades. Were the Hell's Angels the exception? By the way, the Hornet community's mishap rate this year seems to be in the toilet. Anybody got any comparative numbers? --Woody |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/1/04 11:20 PM, in article , "Doug
"Woody" and Erin Beal" wrote: On 10/1/04 4:28 PM, in article , "Allen Epps" wrote: SNIP At least a year ago when I left VAQ-209 (we shared a hangar) , 321 was flying A models so I would guess it just gets sent off to fire fighting school or something and they pull another one from the boneyeard or wherever A's went when the C's hit the fleet (and are now leaving the fleet) Pugs Pugs, I thought all of the USMCR Hornets got ECP-583 A+ upgrades. Were the Hell's Angels the exception? By the way, the Hornet community's mishap rate this year seems to be in the toilet. Anybody got any comparative numbers? --Woody Bad form replying to my own post, but it seems that the overall mishap rate according to the Safety Center (Class A Flight) was 1.13... Better than the last 5 years. Better than the goal, but behind next year's goal of .88. --Woody |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jet was going to Quantico to become a popsicle. Short runway (approx 4 K')
was likely a contributing factor. "Allen Epps" wrote in message et... In article , Ogden Johnson III wrote: Greasy Rider wrote: "Thomas Schoene" proclaimed: http://fredericksburg.com/News/FLS/2...004/1095702046 If that is a photo of a "minor" incident then I'd hate to see some serious damage to an aircraft. The aircraft ran off the runway into a marshy area, at least as the article describes. By NavAir standards, that probably will be classed as a "minor" mishap [not incident] based on the $$ amount required to repair the aircraft. What can be seen of the fuselage/wings doesn't show extensive damage, and the nose end /may/ not have much damage if it also impacted wet lands rather than the embankment it is obscured by. It will certainly make a trip to NARF [or whatever they're calling them these days], before being returned to VMA-321. At least a year ago when I left VAQ-209 (we shared a hangar) , 321 was flying A models so I would guess it just gets sent off to fire fighting school or something and they pull another one from the boneyeard or wherever A's went when the C's hit the fleet (and are now leaving the fleet) Pugs |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Doug \"Woody\" and
Erin Beal wrote: On 10/1/04 4:28 PM, in article , "Allen Epps" wrote: SNIP At least a year ago when I left VAQ-209 (we shared a hangar) , 321 was flying A models so I would guess it just gets sent off to fire fighting school or something and they pull another one from the boneyeard or wherever A's went when the C's hit the fleet (and are now leaving the fleet) Pugs Pugs, I thought all of the USMCR Hornets got ECP-583 A+ upgrades. Were the Hell's Angels the exception? By the way, the Hornet community's mishap rate this year seems to be in the toilet. Anybody got any comparative numbers? --Woody Woody, You may well be right. I just saw next to the buno on their jets it still had F/A-18A. Was the A+ a field mod or depot level work? Pugs |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
When the jet gets sideways, it has a tendency to flip over. Folks don't
typically like to stick around in the cockpit to see what that's like. Su-22 killer Hank Kleeman bought the farm just like that... _____________ José Herculano |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/2/04 5:38 AM, in article
, "Allen Epps" wrote: Pugs, I thought all of the USMCR Hornets got ECP-583 A+ upgrades. Were the Hell's Angels the exception? By the way, the Hornet community's mishap rate this year seems to be in the toilet. Anybody got any comparative numbers? --Woody Woody, You may well be right. I just saw next to the buno on their jets it still had F/A-18A. Was the A+ a field mod or depot level work? Pugs The A+ comes in two flavors: ECP-560 and ECP-583. Both mods upgrade the Mission Computers to XN-8's (i.e. C model MC's) and Embedded GPS/INS (EGI). The result is an F/A-18C weapons system in an F/A-18A airframe--an F/A-18A+. The ECP-583 also comes with an APG-73 (Radar Upgrade or RUG) radar and the Combined Interrogator Transponder (CIT). All this is done at depot level. Long answer for a short question. --Woody |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 11:59:21 +0100, "José Herculano"
proclaimed: When the jet gets sideways, it has a tendency to flip over. Folks don't typically like to stick around in the cockpit to see what that's like. Su-22 killer Hank Kleeman bought the farm just like that... _____________ José Herculano I am proud to have his autograph. I bought him a drink at the O Club at Oceana when they returned from that cruise. He gave me the only Shoot Down patch outside of the squadron. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Doug "Woody" wrote in message ... There's no official "macho factor." I have no idea what you're talking about. Most pilots say: "Know when to go. Then GO." Understood, thanks for the response. Actually, reading another post answered the question in the anecdotal form that some pilots would rather die than "look" bad in front of their peers. I suppose the question then becomes one of what exactly is considered looking bad ? (that would make them ride it out to the end). |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Anyone have a link to video of the C-130 mishap in Minneapolis last week? | Steve R. | Military Aviation | 2 | May 7th 04 01:44 AM |
UH-2A mishap, USS Bon Homme Richard 9Dec62 | Krztalizer | Naval Aviation | 3 | January 31st 04 05:28 AM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |