Clinton nobodies still interrupt air traffic

In article ,
Mxsmanic wrote:

Hatunen writes:

I suspect it's more to protect the planes and to protect the
guests from falling airplanes. Otherwise the sky will be filled
with paparazzi getting in each other's way.

Do paparazzi really care about Chelsea Clinton? Have you seen what she looks
like these days?

You obviously haven't seen the US news shows gushing over "The
closest we come to American Royalty" (and you though the British had a
low threshold for Royalty) and a couple have actually called this the
equivalent of Charles and Diana (with your comment above, I am assuming
that Chelsea in this case is playing the part of Charles- grin).
Besides it isn't about Chelsea, it is about Bill and Hill. THAT,
along with the likely guest list, would bring the paparazzi out in
force.

--
I want to find a voracious, small-minded predator
and name it after the IRS.
Robert Bakker, paleontologist

Kurt Ullman writes:

You obviously haven't seen the US news shows gushing over "The
closest we come to American Royalty" (and you though the British had a
low threshold for Royalty) and a couple have actually called this the
equivalent of Charles and Diana (with your comment above, I am assuming
that Chelsea in this case is playing the part of Charles- grin).

I only look at Web pages, but at least on the Web, CNN, USA Today, and Fox
News don't seem to be saying much, which is just as well.

Chelsea Clinton is proof that, if you're famous, many people will
automatically call you beautiful, no matter what you actually look like. I'm
not sure where she got the ugly genes from, but even at 2000 feet AGL she'd
crack a lens.

Besides it isn't about Chelsea, it is about Bill and Hill. THAT,
along with the likely guest list, would bring the paparazzi out in
force.

Times must be hard for paparazzi these days. How much does a photo of Hilary
bring?

Anyway, it's really hard to see why a TFR is required. Chelsea is not part of
the government. Neither is Bill. And Hilary is only in a minor Cabinet post.
If every Cabinet member needs a TFR whenever she attends a party ...

On Jul 29, 10:43*pm, Hatunen wrote:
On Thu, 29 Jul 2010 21:20:44 -0400, Brian

wrote:
On Thu, 29 Jul 2010 21:56:13 +0200, Mxsmanic
wrote:

Even thought Chelsea and Bill Clinton are of no importance to national
security and Hilary is too unimportant to matter, the FAA is still restricting
flights over the wedding site of what's-her-name:

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com...ffic-restricte....

Soros needs to be protected.

I suspect it's more to protect the planes and to protect the
guests from falling airplanes. Otherwise the sky will be filled
with paparazzi getting in each other's way.

--
* ************** DAVE HATUNEN ) *************
* ** * * * Tucson Arizona, out where the cacti grow * * * * *
* ** My typos & mispellings are intentional copyright traps *

I tend to agree that the FAA has recognized the airspace above this
wedding without the restrictions is apt to be congested. It would be
as appropriate to restrict airspace where ever there may a dangerous
condition.

The bad news is probably Old Rhinebeck Aerodrome will be closed down
-- are those wonderful airshows still there?