A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Self-launch two-seater



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 6th 10, 05:02 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
sisu1a
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 569
Default Self-launch two-seater

I was a bit scared because Taurus being UL. How good speed-gliding
performance you can realistically get from relatively light glider?
Does anyone have experience how this bird behaves in thermals?


In USA it is not even close to an Ultralight, but can be registered
Light Sport (1000lb difference), and of courser one can also register
it as a normal motorglider as well. It's not light per se', just not
as heavy as most 2 seaters since it only has 15m of wing. The fuselage
shape contributes lift to make up for lack of wing area. I read a
review sometime back that spoke very favorably in it's flight
characteristics, including thermaling.

-Paul
  #2  
Old August 6th 10, 06:07 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
nimbus
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 66
Default Self-launch two-seater

There is also the LAK-20 M....
  #3  
Old August 6th 10, 10:22 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Kevin
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 7
Default Self-launch two-seater

The Taurus is "ultralight" in the sense of meeting certain European
licensing classifications. I believe that 4 of the 5 now in the US
are licensed as experimental and the 5th one as an LSA glider. I
understand that the factory is preparing a new manual for countries
like US, in which the gross weight and max payload will be
substantially greater than for the ships licensed in Europe. Empty
weight on my ship is 309 kg / 618 lbs. (including the engine &
ballistic parachute).

The informal consensus seems to be that it has a real world L/D in the
high 30s, which is consistent with my experience.

Thermals nicely. Relatively short wings make for very nice handling,
but of course, you're losing the benefits of longer wings in pure L/D.

I've been very happy with mine so far, other than not flying it
enough....

- Kevin

On Aug 6, 11:02*am, sisu1a wrote:
I was a bit scared because Taurus being UL. How good speed-gliding
performance you can realistically get from relatively light glider?
Does anyone have experience how this bird behaves in thermals?


In USA it is not even close to an Ultralight, but can be registered
Light Sport (1000lb difference), and of courser one can also register
it as a normal motorglider as well. It's not light per se', just not
as heavy as most 2 seaters since it only has 15m of wing. The fuselage
shape contributes lift to make up for lack of wing area. I read a
review sometime back that spoke very favorably in it's flight
characteristics, including thermaling.

-Paul


  #4  
Old August 7th 10, 12:57 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
brianDG303[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 161
Default Self-launch two-seater

On Aug 6, 2:22*pm, Kevin wrote:
The Taurus is "ultralight" in the sense of meeting certain European
licensing classifications. *I believe that 4 of the 5 now in the US
are licensed as experimental and the 5th one as an LSA glider. *I
understand that the factory is preparing a new manual for countries
like US, in which the gross weight and max payload will be
substantially greater than for the ships licensed in Europe. *Empty
weight on my ship is 309 kg / 618 lbs. (including the engine &
ballistic parachute).

The informal consensus seems to be that it has a real world L/D in the
high 30s, which is consistent with my experience.

Thermals nicely. *Relatively short wings make for very nice handling,
but of course, you're losing the benefits of longer wings in pure L/D.

I've been very happy with mine so far, other than not flying it
enough....

- Kevin

On Aug 6, 11:02*am, sisu1a wrote:

I was a bit scared because Taurus being UL. How good speed-gliding
performance you can realistically get from relatively light glider?
Does anyone have experience how this bird behaves in thermals?


In USA it is not even close to an Ultralight, but can be registered
Light Sport (1000lb difference), and of courser one can also register
it as a normal motorglider as well. It's not light per se', just not
as heavy as most 2 seaters since it only has 15m of wing. The fuselage
shape contributes lift to make up for lack of wing area. I read a
review sometime back that spoke very favorably in it's flight
characteristics, including thermaling.


-Paul


Here is an write-up of the Taurus-

http://flightlog.seven-alpha.com/taurus.html

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
F-16 Two Seater Canuck[_2_] Aviation Photos 0 September 3rd 08 03:40 PM
two seater BD5 Philippe Vessaire Home Built 6 October 28th 07 05:28 PM
WTB 2 seater L/S Nav Sleigh Soaring 0 June 11th 06 06:50 PM
WTB L/S Nav 2 Seater Sleigh Soaring 0 May 20th 06 08:28 PM
4-seater Nyal Williams Soaring 54 November 29th 04 10:53 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:12 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.