Jim Pennino or...Jim Pinheado?

On Wed, 15 Sep 2010 17:13:21 -0000, wrote:

Mark wrote:
On Sep 15, 12:21*pm, wrote:
Mark wrote:
There is a poster here called Jim Pennino,

Only thing you've got totally correct so far.

So, are you still planning to modify a LSA to increase the cruise speed,
which will invalidate the airworthiness certificate as well as violate the
rules on who can perform maintenance on a manufactured aircraft?

--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

It depends on what country I'm living in.

LSA is a FAA definition ergo they only exist in the US.

The airplanes may exist outside of the US, but they aren't LSA.

So, are you still planning to modify a LSA to increase the cruise speed,
which will invalidate the airworthiness certificate as well as violate the
rules on who can perform maintenance on a manufactured aircraft?

*larf*
--
A fireside chat not with Ari!
http://tr.im/holj
Motto: Live To Spooge It!

On Sep 15, 1:13*pm, wrote:
Mark wrote:
On Sep 15, 12:21*pm, wrote:
Mark wrote:
There is a poster here called Jim Pennino,

Only thing you've got totally correct so far.

So, are you still planning to modify a LSA to increase the cruise speed,
which will invalidate the airworthiness certificate as well as violate the
rules on who can perform maintenance on a manufactured aircraft?

--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

It depends on what country I'm living in.

LSA is a FAA definition ergo they only exist in the US.

The airplanes may exist outside of the US, but they aren't LSA.

So, are you still planning to modify a LSA to increase the cruise speed,
which will invalidate the airworthiness certificate as well as violate the
rules on who can perform maintenance on a manufactured aircraft?

--
Jim Pennino


There is a poster here called Jim Pennino, but in
actuality he's Jim Pinheado. His tiny little level of
character development leads him to follow new posters
around and make obnoxious incorrect statements.
He will take everything you say and dispute it.

EVERYTHING. When you prove him wrong, he will
do his pinhead dance. He will misquote himself to try
and wiggle out of previous positions. Or he will try and
redefine what he previously said. Upon losing, he will
then SEPERATE OUT a single sentence which wasn't
the original topic, and then try and make this the new
top in order to change the subject.


1) I've made the assertion that airplanes are today
unavailable to the numbers of people interested in
flying as compared to the same in 1970. Not only
have people come forth to share their stories of
confirmation on this, I've even provided income data
and price comparison to prove this. But Pinhead
Pennino argued the ratio hasn't changed. Then
he claimed he didn't say it, and...you guessed it,
changed the arguement to what the definition of
buying power is. Arguement for the sake of arguement.


2) I said that used Piper Sport Airplanes are on the
market. By this...I meant that the Czech sportcruiser
which we are all familiar with ( except pinhead ) are
available. You see, often these planes get new names,
and for a time we call them by their old names, or
we use the new name, but everyone knows them as
the same plane under their old name.
Example: For a couple of years anytime I mentioned
the Cessna 350 or Cessna 400, no old timers knew
what I was talking about. This is because they were
previously, and still commonly thought of as the
Columbia 350 or Columbia 400. For all intents and
purposes it was the same plane with a new name.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Columbia_Aircraft.


In the case of my arguement with Pinheado, it's amply
clear that he didn't even know where the hell the
Piper Sport came from. After I corrected him, he googled
the info and tried to build a dishonest defense to his
mistake. Even today he won't take the word of the
President of Piper!! He argues for the sake of arguement,
oh...and insults you every step of the way, and tells folks
that the person disagreeing with him must be a "troll",
or a "retard".


3) Pinheado made the claim that pretty much ALL LSA's
go 138mph. (then he lied and changed his "fact" to
a range of 130mph - 138mph) Still wrong. You see,
he didn't have a clue as to which planes were in this
category. So, he googled...and saw the thousands of
ultralights are also LSA's which couldn't possibly even
go 90mph. How did Pinheado react to yet another one
of his wrong statements? You guessed it. He changed
the subject to his new argument for the sake of arguement,
which was..."Which website advertises more planes?"
Then he singled out one model of plane for comparison
to try and prove his point. How anal. Really, who knows
or gives a flying **** which website is the winner? The
fact is, we're talking thousands and thousands by
barnstormers, and that isn't the original debate anyway.
My original point is that all LSA's don't go 138mph.


This is just a sampling of the behaviour you may expect from
Pinheado. Is this an attempt at cyberbullying? Of course it
is. Why would he do this? Answer: Because he's...
Jim Pinheado, the anal pinhead who argues for the sake of
arguement, so he won't let anyone take his little corner
away from him.


---
Reporting from the front:


Mark

On Wed, 15 Sep 2010 10:44:41 -0700 (PDT), Mark wrote:

Reporting from the front:
Coming in from the rear
Mark - Reach arounds given

oooooooooK

Mark wrote:
On Sep 15, 1:13Â*pm, wrote:
Mark wrote:
On Sep 15, 12:21Â*pm, wrote:
Mark wrote:
There is a poster here called Jim Pennino,

Only thing you've got totally correct so far.

So, are you still planning to modify a LSA to increase the cruise speed,
which will invalidate the airworthiness certificate as well as violate the
rules on who can perform maintenance on a manufactured aircraft?

--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

It depends on what country I'm living in.

LSA is a FAA definition ergo they only exist in the US.

The airplanes may exist outside of the US, but they aren't LSA.

So, are you still planning to modify a LSA to increase the cruise speed,
which will invalidate the airworthiness certificate as well as violate the
rules on who can perform maintenance on a manufactured aircraft?

--
Jim Pennino


There is a poster here called Jim Pennino,

To whom you stated you were planning to modify a LSA to increase the cruise
speed, which will invalidate the airworthiness certificate as well as
violate the rules on who can perform maintenance on a manufactured aircraft.

Are you still planning to do that?


--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

On Sep 15, 1:13*pm, wrote:

It depends on what country I'm living in.

LSA is a FAA definition ergo they only exist in the US.

I think you mean "AN" FAA definition, and...Wrong again. A
plane manufactured under the definition of LSA in the United
States is given that identity. They are also flown all over the
world and recognized as such, irrespective of any municipal
jurisdiction. The identity crosses borders. This is common
knowledge in the international community.


The airplanes may exist outside of the US, but they aren't LSA.

Wrong.

So, are you still planning to modify a LSA to increase the cruise speed,
which will invalidate the airworthiness certificate

Wrong. I can perform specific modifications to my LSA and it will
not invalidate the airworthiness certificate.

Question:
"What about repairing and modifying my LSA? That’s legal just as with
experimental aircraft, isn’t it?"

Answer:
"Yes and no, it depends on the type of LSA. If you build your own
experimental LSA (E-LSA), then you are the de facto A&P and can do
repairs and mods."

http://www.planeandpilotmag.com/pilo...&print=1&page=


...as well as violate the
rules on who can perform maintenance on a manufactured aircraft?

WRONG. I can also also perform minimal maintenance on a manufactured
aircraft.

"However, if you buy a prebuilt “special” LSA (S-LSA), then you can
only do minimal preventative maintenance. (For a list, see FAR Part
43, Appendix A.) To make your own annual inspection, you must take a
16-hour maintenance course. But the 16-hour course only lets you
inspect your airplane for defects. You still can’t do significant
maintenance on it."
http://www.planeandpilotmag.com/pilo...&print=1&page=

But then, I never said I was committed to buying AN (S-LSA). The
best route is thru builder assist take-over. It's cheaper and the
owner
upon completion may become the A & P. ( then you get yourself
in a community of like owners for full time expertise and advice )
You may now perform mods, repairs, and full maintainence of a
plane as sophisticated as the Arion Lightning.

---
Mark

--
Jim Pennino

Mark wrote:
On Sep 15, 1:13Â*pm, wrote:

It depends on what country I'm living in.

LSA is a FAA definition ergo they only exist in the US.

I think you mean "AN" FAA definition, and...Wrong again. A
plane manufactured under the definition of LSA in the United
States is given that identity. They are also flown all over the
world and recognized as such, irrespective of any municipal
jurisdiction. The identity crosses borders. This is common
knowledge in the international community.

No, since "FAA" begins with a consonant, a FAA...

No, LSA is a type of aircraft that only exists in the US and LSA's can
not be flown outside of the US.

The plane models registered in the US as LSA may be registered in other
countries under some designation specific to that country, but it is not LSA.

The airplanes may exist outside of the US, but they aren't LSA.

Wrong.

Right since no country other than the US has a type called LSA.

So, are you still planning to modify a LSA to increase the cruise speed,
which will invalidate the airworthiness certificate

Wrong. I can perform specific modifications to my LSA and it will
not invalidate the airworthiness certificate.

Wrong, no one can perform modifications to a LSA.

To maintain LSA status, the airplane has to conform to the manufactures
specifications.

A modification under the FAA definition is a change outside of the
manufacturers specifications.

Question:
"What about repairing and modifying my LSA? That’s legal just as with
experimental aircraft, isn’t it?"

Answer:
"Yes and no, it depends on the type of LSA. If you build your own
experimental LSA (E-LSA), then you are the de facto A&P and can do
repairs and mods."

http://www.planeandpilotmag.com/pilo...&print=1&page=

Nope, not for a LSA.

It has to always conform to the manufacturers specifications, even if it
is a kit or just a set of plans.

...as well as violate the
rules on who can perform maintenance on a manufactured aircraft?

WRONG. I can also also perform minimal maintenance on a manufactured
aircraft.

I never said you couldn't, but you can not change props on a manufactured
aircraft of any kind without the proper certificates.

"However, if you buy a prebuilt “special� LSA (S-LSA), then you can
only do minimal preventative maintenance. (For a list, see FAR Part
43, Appendix A.) To make your own annual inspection, you must take a
16-hour maintenance course. But the 16-hour course only lets you
inspect your airplane for defects. You still can’t do significant
maintenance on it."

Yeah, so what?

Any pilot can do the maintenance on any airplane they fly under the limits
of Part 43.

Removing and replacing props isn't allowed under that, much less changing
props.

http://www.planeandpilotmag.com/pilo...&print=1&page=

But then, I never said I was committed to buying AN (S-LSA). The
best route is thru builder assist take-over. It's cheaper and the
owner
upon completion may become the A & P. ( then you get yourself
in a community of like owners for full time expertise and advice )
You may now perform mods, repairs, and full maintainence of a
plane as sophisticated as the Arion Lightning.

No, you can never do any modifications to any LSA; it always has to conform
to the manufacturers, kit or pre-built, specifications.


--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

On Thu, 16 Sep 2010 19:26:44 -0700 (PDT), Mark wrote:

I think you mean "AN" FAA definition, and...Wrong again. A
plane manufactured under the definition of LSA in the United
States is given that identity. They are also flown all over the
world and recognized as such, irrespective of any municipal
jurisdiction. The identity crosses borders. This is common
knowledge in the international community.

*NYUKLES EXPONENTIAL*
--
A fireside chat not with Ari!
http://tr.im/holj
Motto: Live To Spooge It!