![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Dave" wrote in message
m... my implication was that if you're flying "hard IFR", you're in IMC on an IFR flight plan, and would thus be subject to 91.21. 91.21 applies to all flight. If you think that WxWorx with a laptop is not legal for "hard IFR" (which most of us call "hard IMC") based on 91.21, then you think it is not legal under any circumstances. Do you really think that? Pete |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Peter Duniho" wrote in message ...
"Dave" wrote in message m... my implication was that if you're flying "hard IFR", you're in IMC on an IFR flight plan, and would thus be subject to 91.21. 91.21 applies to all flight. If you think that WxWorx with a laptop is not legal for "hard IFR" (which most of us call "hard IMC") based on 91.21, then you think it is not legal under any circumstances. Do you really think that? Pete I, and many pilots I know, interpret this rule to mean that flying under part 91 on an IFR flight plan, it is illegal to use any portable electronics not FAA-approved. This rule says nothing about VFR operations. I think the issue at hand is if you are in the soup and using an 'unapproved' piece of electronic equipment that you really don't know for certain will or won't cause interferenec with your equipment, then you shouldn't be using it. Another idea may be that if you are fiddling with a laptop sitting in your lap, right seat or even a pedistal between seats, that's time that you're not focused on the instruments. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Dave" wrote in message
om... I, and many pilots I know, interpret this rule to mean that flying under part 91 on an IFR flight plan, it is illegal to use any portable electronics not FAA-approved. Sounds like you've changed your tune. Before, you were claiming the regulation prohibited use of electronics when flying "hard IFR". Now you've apparently figured out that only the flight rules under which the flight is made matter, and that the meteorological conditions are irrelevant. Glad you came around... |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Perhaps I should clarify rather than change my tune. Hard IFR would
imply to me that you are flying under IFR. When the FAA says "under IFR", I take that to mean you are filed - regardless of whether the conditions warrant it. But an being on an IFR flight plan would not necessarily imply that the conditions are IMC. So, yeah - you could be flying an IFR plan(i.e. "under IFR") with perfectly good VFR conditions. The reg would indicate that *any*time you are on an IFR plan (i.e. "under IFR"), regardless of the weather, you can't use portable electronics. My original comment about not being able to use the laptop while in "hard IFR" implied that you are flying on an IFR plan (i.e. "under IFR"), hence under IFR regs and could not therefore legally use it. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Dave" wrote in message
m... [...] My original comment about not being able to use the laptop while in "hard IFR" implied that you are flying on an IFR plan (i.e. "under IFR"), hence under IFR regs and could not therefore legally use it. Suppose I told you "it's illegal to fly an airplane IFR without a current annual inspection". Suppose you didn't already know that annual inspections are required for ALL flight in Normal category aircraft (among others), whether IFR or not. Do you feel that my statement would be useful? That is, that it would tell you what you need to know? Even given that you know annuals are required for VFR flight, do you think what I said was -- even though completely true -- a useful contribution to a discussion? The use of "hard IFR" in your original statement implied (without actually saying so) that the regulation applies *only* to "hard IFR" flight. It is this misleading nature of your original statement that Dan (and subsequently I) was taking issue with. Pete |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My definition of "hard" IFR is solid clouds, moderate turbulence,
up/down drafts, and no autopilot for say, 3 hours straight. Then a landing to minimums. I believe the distinction you were shooting for was "IMC" vs. "VMC" on an IFR flight plan. A clarification on one point. You say you cannot "use" portable devices on an IFR flight. Maybe you made this distinction in an earlier post to this thread, but I don't believe there are any regs that say you cannot "use" portable, non installed, or non approved electronics at any time (VFR or IFR). They cannot be relied upon as "primary" sources of navigation (information). They also cannot "interfere" with those primary instruments/electronics. Having an IPAQ hooked up to an inertial unit to display pitch and bank, and having a portable moving map running while on an IFR flight is, I believe, perfectly legal. However, to make the IFR flight "legally", you must have approved instruments and navigational gear running as your "primary" sources of flight information. Now, if you have an accident (and live), there is always the possibility you could be dinged by the FAA or the insurance company for having that stuff "in the way" or "causing a distraction" that led to the accident. I believe this would fit in the FAA's "careless and reckless" operation category. I have to dust off the regs and check. It has been a few years since I had to take the test. Mike Dave wrote: Perhaps I should clarify rather than change my tune. Hard IFR would imply to me that you are flying under IFR. When the FAA says "under IFR", I take that to mean you are filed - regardless of whether the conditions warrant it. But an being on an IFR flight plan would not necessarily imply that the conditions are IMC. So, yeah - you could be flying an IFR plan(i.e. "under IFR") with perfectly good VFR conditions. The reg would indicate that *any*time you are on an IFR plan (i.e. "under IFR"), regardless of the weather, you can't use portable electronics. My original comment about not being able to use the laptop while in "hard IFR" implied that you are flying on an IFR plan (i.e. "under IFR"), hence under IFR regs and could not therefore legally use it. __________________________________________________ ____________________ Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - FAST UNLIMITED DOWNLOAD - http://www.uncensored-news.com The Worlds Uncensored News Source |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
WxWorx flight test | Dan Luke | Instrument Flight Rules | 22 | October 12th 03 02:54 PM |
WxWorx continued | Dan Luke | Instrument Flight Rules | 8 | September 27th 03 01:05 PM |
WxWorx is shipping, looking for first feedback | Mark T. Mueller | Instrument Flight Rules | 15 | September 13th 03 02:01 PM |
(long) WxWorx arrived...(and NavAero) | Lenny Sawyer | Instrument Flight Rules | 1 | September 10th 03 12:39 AM |
Small Blue Planet Toys goes Postal !! Economy Shipping Options now availalble | Small Blue Planet Toys | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | July 11th 03 04:00 PM |