![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Follow-up: yesterday I did my first x/c with the Oudie/SYM + SN10. (An
AST!!!) SeeYou Mobile is *much* happier with the air data from the SN10. The combination worked great. I would go so far as to say that SYM's thermal assistant is next to useless without the air data (which I would expect), while very effective with. tuN7o |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 4, 7:25*am, Tuno wrote:
Follow-up: yesterday I did my first x/c with the Oudie/SYM + SN10. (An AST!!!) SeeYou Mobile is *much* happier with the air data from the SN10. The combination worked great. I would go so far as to say that SYM's thermal assistant is next to useless without the air data (which I would expect), while very effective with. tuN7o But is it the airdata that made it better or the external GPS position source? The HP310 internal GPS makes the LK8000 thermal assistant useless but it may well work better with an external GPS. It seems to work quite quite well in replay mode using 2 second flight logs from the 302. Also with internal GPS the 310/LK8000 circling wind estimates are sometimes hazardously misleading. I don't know anything about the charactersitics of the Oudie internal GPS but I doubt it was optimized for aviation. Was it? Andy |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Good question wrt the GPS quality. How is a receiver optimized for
aviation? But I do think the air data makes a huge difference in wind and glide calculations. Without it, SYM and the SN10 provided varying answers on the steering to target; with the airdata, they always matched. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 4, 10:21*am, Tuno wrote:
Good question wrt the GPS quality. How is a receiver optimized for aviation? But I do think the air data makes a huge difference in wind and glide calculations. Without it, SYM and the SN10 provided varying answers on the steering to target; with the airdata, they always matched. I'd be convinced if you disabled the SN10 GPS feed and saw the same results. Or are you saying the SN-10 is feeding only airdata to the Oudie and not GPS position data. PNA GPS receivers are typically optimized for car navigation. One result is that they like to say they are going straight even if the host vehicle is turning. Ok it's not the GPS receiver itself but the associated data processing and in some devices, such as the HP310, no one has yet found a way to hack it so it works properly. Andy |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 4, 10:37*am, Andy wrote:
On Apr 4, 10:21*am, Tuno wrote: Good question wrt the GPS quality. How is a receiver optimized for aviation? But I do think the air data makes a huge difference in wind and glide calculations. Without it, SYM and the SN10 provided varying answers on the steering to target; with the airdata, they always matched. I'd be convinced if you disabled the SN10 GPS feed and saw the same results. Or are you saying the SN-10 is feeding only airdata to the Oudie and not GPS position data. PNA GPS receivers are typically optimized for car navigation. *One result is that they like to say they are going straight even if the host vehicle is turning. *Ok it's not the GPS receiver itself but the associated data processing and in some devices, such as the HP310, no one has yet found a way to hack it so it works properly. Andy Andy, do I read you correctly that you are assuming that the Oudie suffers from the same issue as the HP310? It seem possible that the Oudie was hacked in such a way as to prevent that, or didn't have the problem in the first place. It would be interesting to know about that. I've got two flights on a MiniMap and the wind information is a lot more believable that what the HP310 was giving me. Brian |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 4, 10:37*am, Andy wrote:
On Apr 4, 10:21*am, Tuno wrote: Good question wrt the GPS quality. How is a receiver optimized for aviation? But I do think the air data makes a huge difference in wind and glide calculations. Without it, SYM and the SN10 provided varying answers on the steering to target; with the airdata, they always matched. I'd be convinced if you disabled the SN10 GPS feed and saw the same results. Or are you saying the SN-10 is feeding only airdata to the Oudie and not GPS position data. PNA GPS receivers are typically optimized for car navigation. *One result is that they like to say they are going straight even if the host vehicle is turning. *Ok it's not the GPS receiver itself but the associated data processing and in some devices, such as the HP310, no one has yet found a way to hack it so it works properly. Andy Andy, I've been told, and I hope it's correct, that sending a GPS signal to the 310 will give better results. I will be using a Powerflarm to send the 310 data and by-pass the internal GPS. It is a simple setting in the LK8000 software for a com port and baud rate setting. Brad |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
@Andy: I saw a large difference before and after connecting the SN10,
that's good enough for me. One of the things I checked after connecting the SN10 was the data stream using SYM's terminal feature. Observed all the normal NMEA sentences plus the SN10's $PILC sentences. Andres will have to answer to whether/how the Oudie's GPS is optimized for aviation, it's immaterial at this point. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Oudie Pilot Reports? | AY | Soaring | 6 | December 12th 10 11:51 PM |
Oudie - ConnectMe question | [email protected] | Soaring | 9 | August 9th 10 04:18 PM |
Oudie with a LX 5000 | Randy[_2_] | Soaring | 2 | May 24th 10 10:48 AM |
New Oudie Photos | Paul Remde | Soaring | 3 | April 30th 10 04:17 PM |