![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dude" wrote in message ... Much as I hate to say it, Garmin looks pretty far ahead of the alternatives You are listing their successes and saying they are not making any mistakes. That doesn't hold any water. The mistakes they make today could easily be their downfall in the future, and the big one is pride. Pride didn't stop Microsoft from gaining their position and they never met a release date they didn't blow. The only things that will hurt Garmin are (a) deterioration of their market or (b) competition. Garmin is well-positioned for the swings of the GA market because the G1000 spans such a broad swathe of the aviation market. Avidyne, OTOH, is nearly 100% tied to new shipments of piston singles, which is the most cyclical segment of the market. As to competition, who? The barriers to entry are substantial- designing and certifying a G1000 competitor would probably cost well into the tens of millions. Even Avidyne hasn't done this, if you consider that the Entegra system gets its navigation and communication capabilities from *Garmin* radios. We're probably talking on the order of fifty million or more. That's a major chunk of change. Now, how big is the GA avionics market, really? Let's say that Cessna, Piper, Cirrus, and Diamond ship about 4,000 new planes per year, and adding everybody else gets us to 5,000. Assuming every single one of these gets a full glass flight deck at the value of $30k per plane, you're looking at $150 million per year. That's not profit, either, just revenue. I suspect there is more money in those little packets of salt and ketchup you get at McDonald's, with a lot fewer difficulties. Adding all this together, it looks pretty unlikely that anyone new is going to enter this market. The best hope that's out there is for King and Avidyne to get together and come up with a real G1000 alternative, but I wouldn't bet on it. In fact, my portfolio is betting that Garmin will continue cleaning up, as they have been doing for some time now. -cwk. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Avidyne is already working on this, as is Honeywell.
Avidyne already is working with one of the speculative microjet players, and Honeywell could move down - though not likely. I believe the barriers to entry are not all that large anymore. Also, this market attracts people with big money and who seemingly are not all that worried about big profits (or they are serious dreamers). Either the market is profitable enough that it makes sense to enter, or its low margins in which case a spotless image is even more important to keep up volumes. "C Kingsbury" wrote in message ink.net... "Dude" wrote in message ... Much as I hate to say it, Garmin looks pretty far ahead of the alternatives You are listing their successes and saying they are not making any mistakes. That doesn't hold any water. The mistakes they make today could easily be their downfall in the future, and the big one is pride. Pride didn't stop Microsoft from gaining their position and they never met a release date they didn't blow. The only things that will hurt Garmin are (a) deterioration of their market or (b) competition. Garmin is well-positioned for the swings of the GA market because the G1000 spans such a broad swathe of the aviation market. Avidyne, OTOH, is nearly 100% tied to new shipments of piston singles, which is the most cyclical segment of the market. As to competition, who? The barriers to entry are substantial- designing and certifying a G1000 competitor would probably cost well into the tens of millions. Even Avidyne hasn't done this, if you consider that the Entegra system gets its navigation and communication capabilities from *Garmin* radios. We're probably talking on the order of fifty million or more. That's a major chunk of change. Now, how big is the GA avionics market, really? Let's say that Cessna, Piper, Cirrus, and Diamond ship about 4,000 new planes per year, and adding everybody else gets us to 5,000. Assuming every single one of these gets a full glass flight deck at the value of $30k per plane, you're looking at $150 million per year. That's not profit, either, just revenue. I suspect there is more money in those little packets of salt and ketchup you get at McDonald's, with a lot fewer difficulties. Adding all this together, it looks pretty unlikely that anyone new is going to enter this market. The best hope that's out there is for King and Avidyne to get together and come up with a real G1000 alternative, but I wouldn't bet on it. In fact, my portfolio is betting that Garmin will continue cleaning up, as they have been doing for some time now. -cwk. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions List (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 40 | October 3rd 08 03:13 PM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | October 1st 04 02:31 PM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions List (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | September 2nd 04 05:15 AM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 2 | February 2nd 04 11:41 PM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently-Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | July 4th 03 04:50 PM |