A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Diamona DA-20 Katana Review (not for the tall!)



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
Old October 17th 03, 01:53 AM
noah
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Diamona DA-20 Katana Review (not for the tall!)

Hi,
So I didn't find many reviews of the Katana prior to my 'checkout'
flight 'attempt' in one. This afternoon I took a 1.2 hr checkout
flight with a CFI from Diamond Air (www.ksql.com) at San Carlos
airport (KSQL).

Summing up my opinion: If you're over 5'8", or have a long torso,
forget about the Katana. I'm 5'11" and it wasn't too good.

Specific gripes:

My back is killing me! - my head was partially tilted to the
center, and this was using a loaned headset (my lightspeed wouldn't
let us close the canopy!

The rudder pedals are of poor design - making it difficult to
differentiate between 'rudder' and 'rudder+brake' - without enough
space above the pedals for a normal size 10 shoe to effectively
modulate the brake/rudder seperately.

The stick forces required for 'the maneuvers' were much higher
than I expected at speed (around 100kts). At low speeds this wasn't an
issue.

Slips don't help nearly as much as in a C172/152 for losing
altitude (due to small cross section fuse.)

The big round ball of fire called The Sun. It was blinding just
going anywhere near West - even at our 2:30pm departure from SQL.
There are no sunvisors - so you find yourself leaning back beneath the
painted section of canopy.

Space - my standard kneeboard (student vfr style) barely allowed
for full control movement - and blocked easy access to the throttle
and prop controls. This is *not* an xc machine, and definitely not a
machine for light travel for two... for that I think you'll need
something else.

Good stuff:

The canopy and excellent view. I really liked the low wing
visibility for scanning for traffic. I can't say (haven't flown yet)
about the pipers, but I think having the wing a good few feet below
your eyes allows for a much smaller blindspot - had an easy time
spotting traffic.

The view, view, and more view.

Constant speed prop - this was the first time I flew a plane with
a CS prop - and it was nice. I think this contributed to the smooth
and quiet experience, although this could also be the transition from
25 year old cessnas to a 5yr old composite plane



Overall - I'm glad soo many people on these newsgroups recommended
'try before you buy' - or in my case: 'try before day dreaming!' I'll
go and try a Piper low wing in a week or so and think I'll like it
much more than the Cessna fleet.

blue skies...
Noah
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Sheppard AFB review team findings announced Otis Willie Military Aviation 0 February 27th 04 02:52 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:54 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.