A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Help me clear up my brain fart



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 11th 03, 02:43 PM
Ron Natalie
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Ekim" wrote in message om...

Was all that preaching JUST to reduce the chance of invoking a deadly
spin in case the wings are accidentally stalled?


Yes, by an ignorant flight instructor. While keeping in coordinated flight
will certainly alleviate the chances of spinning, a slip doesn't mean you
necessarily will. Avoiding stalling is really important. You can't spin without
stalling and even stalls without spins on approach aren't a good idea.

It seems to all
contradict everything about slips on final and the famous
"low-wing-into-the-wind" crosswind landings?


You have to slip at some point in a crosswind unless you're going to
touch down in a crab which is bad for most aircraft.

In my mind, as long as I keep my airspeed sufficiently high and keep
the nose pointed down, (ie. keep my AOA under control) things like a
steeper banks and routine slip to landings should be relatively safe.
Right?


Well slips are ok. Steeper banks are still a problem. Remember your
accellerated stall drills.


  #2  
Old November 11th 03, 02:53 PM
Corky Scott
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On 11 Nov 2003 04:25:56 -0800, (Ekim) wrote:

"Never cross control!!!"
"Keep that ball centered!"
"Never use more than 20 degrees bank!"
"Too high on final - go around. Never slip unless its an emergency
landing."

These are things that were hammered in my head by my numerous CFIs
during pattern training as a student pilot. Now that I have my PPL,
you would think I should have this understood. Unfortunately, now this
is really twisted up in my head.

Was all that preaching JUST to reduce the chance of invoking a deadly
spin in case the wings are accidentally stalled? It seems to all
contradict everything about slips on final and the famous
"low-wing-into-the-wind" crosswind landings?

In my mind, as long as I keep my airspeed sufficiently high and keep
the nose pointed down, (ie. keep my AOA under control) things like a
steeper banks and routine slip to landings should be relatively safe.
Right?

Thanks,
Ekim


Ekim, my opinion (being a freshly minted pilot) is that the
information you were given may depend on the size and width of the
runway you train from as well as the attitude of the CFI's.

Where I trained, the runways are long and wide. The instructor was
constanty telling me to keep my speed up on final. All approaches
were made with 1500 rpm on the tachometer. This made for wide
patterns and necessitated the use of flaps on final. Why did he teach
this? Many reasons, but mostly for safety's sake. It's really hard
to stall/spin in the pattern if you keep your speed up. The other
reason involves a bit of conjecture on my part. The FBO is located at
the opposite end of both runnway's that are in most common use. If
you land short, and the C172 can land impressively short, you have a
long taxi back to the ramp. If you land hot and long, the taxi is
that much shorter.

At an airfield that has a short grass runway, the approach might
necessitate a steeper descent using some slipping.

Keeping some power on may be considered a method for preventing shock
cooling the engine, I don't know. But there are many methods for
landing including cutting the throttle completely and turning in
sooner to take advantage of the more rapid rate of descent.

Mike wrote:
Keep the ball centered in cruise and in turns, unless you're slipping in a
turn. A lot of times I throw in a little top rudder in the base to final
turn to bleed off excess altitude.


I used this technique just this weekend. I was on base and realised
that I'd turned in a bit early and was high. So as I turned on final,
I added a lot of top rudder and held the turn and kept the speed up
and spilled off most of the excess altitude in a cross controlled
turn.

I fly a lot with a friend who owns a Waco UPF-7 biplane. Like most
biplanes, it doesn't have flaps, so the approach is controlled by
slipping. Being a biplane and having all that drag, the Waco drops
like a rock once the approach speed is reached and the throttle is
chopped. Without slipping, the rate of descent reaches 2,000 fpm. We
always end up high on final, to make sure the runway can be reached,
whereupon the left wing goes way down and a LOT of right rudder is
applied and we come down like a broken elevator.

I once watched a video of a C-130 approaching to land at an airstrip
under hostile fire in Vietnam. It stayed high until I assumed it
wasn't going to land, then it lifted up a wing and kicked in opposite
rudder and dropped like it had been shot down. If I hadn't been
watching, I would have said it wasn't possible to handle that size an
airplane like that. But it worked.

Corky Scott


  #4  
Old November 11th 03, 06:17 PM
Peter Duniho
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Ekim" wrote in message
om...
In my mind, as long as I keep my airspeed sufficiently high and keep
the nose pointed down, (ie. keep my AOA under control) things like a
steeper banks and routine slip to landings should be relatively safe.
Right?


Right.

In fact, the admonition to never go beyond some arbitrarily low bank angle
while in the pattern is thought to be one of the common ways that
low-altitude stall/spin accidents happen. Pilot thinks steep bank angles
are bad, is overshooting final, tries to compensate without a steep bank
angle by using rudder to get the nose around, then stalls in the skidding
turn.

It's obviously much better if you can always fly a nice, easy pattern. But
when things don't go perfectly, the right thing to do is *fly the airplane*,
doing what's necessary to acheive your goals safely. Coordinated flight is
safe. Slips are safe. If the turn needs to be steeper in order to keep the
plane coordinated, so be it. If you need to slip to correct for extra
altitude on final, go right ahead.

There may well be situations in which the more prudent decision is to go
around and try again. You are expected to identify those situations and
take appropriate action when necessary. But there's nothing inherently
wrong with a steep turn or a slip that automatically requires such an
action.

Pete


  #6  
Old November 11th 03, 07:19 PM
Ron Natalie
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Malcolm Teas" wrote in message om...

At my school we were told "not more than 30 degrees of bank in the
pattern". I personally heard from my instructors to keep the ball
centered unless you were slipping.


All good advice.

We did practice slipping, it was
regarded as something you needed to know and show you could do it, but
not normal procedure.


It's essential to crosswind landings.

I also heard a lot of "more right rudder", but that was just me...


Standard flight instructor mantra.


  #7  
Old November 11th 03, 08:56 PM
Tom S.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Ron Natalie" wrote in message
. ..

"Malcolm Teas" wrote in message

om...

At my school we were told "not more than 30 degrees of bank in the
pattern". I personally heard from my instructors to keep the ball
centered unless you were slipping.


All good advice.

We did practice slipping, it was
regarded as something you needed to know and show you could do it, but
not normal procedure.


It's essential to crosswind landings.

I also heard a lot of "more right rudder", but that was just me...


Standard flight instructor mantra.

Okay...flame war time!

OWT: Power determines pitch, and pitch determines speed.


  #8  
Old November 11th 03, 09:53 PM
mike regish
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

power plus pitch equals performance

mike regish

"Tom S." wrote in message
...

"Ron Natalie" wrote in message
. ..

"Malcolm Teas" wrote in message

om...

At my school we were told "not more than 30 degrees of bank in the
pattern". I personally heard from my instructors to keep the ball
centered unless you were slipping.


All good advice.

We did practice slipping, it was
regarded as something you needed to know and show you could do it, but
not normal procedure.


It's essential to crosswind landings.

I also heard a lot of "more right rudder", but that was just me...


Standard flight instructor mantra.

Okay...flame war time!

OWT: Power determines pitch, and pitch determines speed.




  #10  
Old November 11th 03, 07:25 PM
David B. Cole
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Mike made a good point about the difference in stall characteristics
between a slip and a skid. Based on my reading and from really
thinking about the aerodynamics of both, a slip is more spin
'resistant' than a skid for several reasons. Notice I said resistant
and not proof. Probably the most important reason is that in a slip
the roll and yaw component have been decoupled. In other words the
direction of roll and yaw are opposite. This is one reason why the
wings return to level first in a stall from a slip. If you think
about what each control input is doing to the AOA on each wing in a
slip it should become clear that the high wing stall first. In a
skid, the opposite is true and both roll and yaw are in the same
direction, which is a bad thing. In a skid the lower wing stalls
first and as Mike said, you'll probably find yourself inverted
quickly.

Another benefit of a slip is that a large area of the elevator is
blanked by the vertical stabilizer because the relative wind is
coming more from the side. Therefore, because airflow is blocked over
a portion of the elevator, there may not be enough elevator authority
to stall the plane. The third point is that with the relative wind
coming from the side, the fuselage is also acting as a lifting
surface, just not an effective one. A few good books to read on the
subject would be Emergency Maneuver Training by Stowell, Stalls,
Spins, and Safety by Sammy Mason, and Aerodynamics for Naval Aviators
to name a few.

Dave
(Ekim) wrote in message . com...
"Never cross control!!!"
"Keep that ball centered!"
"Never use more than 20 degrees bank!"
"Too high on final - go around. Never slip unless its an emergency
landing."

These are things that were hammered in my head by my numerous CFIs
during pattern training as a student pilot. Now that I have my PPL,
you would think I should have this understood. Unfortunately, now this
is really twisted up in my head.

Was all that preaching JUST to reduce the chance of invoking a deadly
spin in case the wings are accidentally stalled? It seems to all
contradict everything about slips on final and the famous
"low-wing-into-the-wind" crosswind landings?

In my mind, as long as I keep my airspeed sufficiently high and keep
the nose pointed down, (ie. keep my AOA under control) things like a
steeper banks and routine slip to landings should be relatively safe.
Right?

Thanks,
Ekim

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Did the Germans have the Norden bombsight? Cub Driver Military Aviation 106 May 12th 04 07:18 AM
How 'bout a thread on the F-22 with no mud slinging, no axe grinding, no emotional diatribes, and just some clear, objective discussion? Scott Ferrin Military Aviation 23 January 8th 04 12:39 AM
This post will clear a lot of things up Jack White Military Aviation 0 September 14th 03 10:52 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:42 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.