![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Peter R. wrote
Thank you for the warning. I was going to start with the American Bonanza Society to see if this group would be able to point me in the right direction. Best bet, IMO. They will also hook you up with an instructor. However, you have me thinking: Is there a characteristic of the Baron dual yoke that a non-Beech experienced person like me would be able to spot to expose such a scandal? Yes, but not easily. It looks the same, except that the part that mounts on the shaft is subtly different. You can make it work, but it's crooked and will either be hitting your knees or blocking the lower part of the panel. BTW - be careful in regards to the checkout. The Bo is EXTREMELY easy to land - easier than anything I have ever flown, including the C-172. In fact, when you transition from a C-172 or equivalent, you can complete a day-VFR checkout in an hour or two, no problem. The same plane will eat your lunch night-IFR. A reasonable checkout for a pilot who is already instrument proficient in a C-172 or similar and wishes to fly something like a Bo IFR is 10 hours. Michael |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Michael ) wrote:
The same plane will eat your lunch night-IFR. A reasonable checkout for a pilot who is already instrument proficient in a C-172 or similar and wishes to fly something like a Bo IFR is 10 hours. Good point, Michael. I am going to be even more conservative than that. Despite 550 hours in a C172, I've lowered my expectation to at least 25 hours to check out in the Bo, most due to IMC/night IMC challenges in an aircraft that can over-speed in an unusual attitude in seconds. -- Peter R. ----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups ---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Michael" wrote in message
om... BTW - be careful in regards to the checkout. The Bo is EXTREMELY easy to land - easier than anything I have ever flown, including the C-172. I found an Apache easier to land than a 172. Paul |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Peter R. wrote
Good point, Michael. I am going to be even more conservative than that. Despite 550 hours in a C172, I've lowered my expectation to at least 25 hours to check out in the Bo, most due to IMC/night IMC challenges in an aircraft that can over-speed in an unusual attitude in seconds. Actually, any fast and efficient airplane can overspeed in an unusual attitude in seconds. The Bo is no more prone to it than other airplanes that offer similarly efficient cruise. There's no magic to it - if you want to go fast and not burn a ton of gas, you have to make the plane slippery. Slippery planes accelerate quickly when the nose comes down. The difference between the Bo and other airplanes in its class is the landing qualities. The plane is so easy to land that it will lull you into a false sense of security if you let it. It's no more difficult in night/IMC than other planes in its class. I think a 25 hour minimum is excessive. With 550 hours and an instrument rating, you could transition into a twin (and I mean a real twin like a C-310, not a trainer like a Seminole) and do it safely in 25 hours given good instruction. The Bo shouldn't take more than half that. I suspect your insurance company is going to want 10-15 hours, and with quality instruction that should be plenty. The key is getting good quality instruction. Your open pilot warranty is probably going to require 800-1500TT, 200-500 retract, and 25 in make and model. First off, I suggest you NOT ask the insurance company to name someone who doesn't meet that. Second, I suggest you look for someone who has lots of experience flying and teaching in that class of airplane. Bonanza time is best, and your top choice would be someone who owns his own Bo, but time in similarly performing airplanes is almost as good. Baron or TravelAir, Comanche (single or twin), Cessna 210 or 310, Bellance 14-19 or Viking, that kind of thing. Stay away from the guy with 40 hours of Bonanza time picked up while getting someone an instrument rating and lots of retract time in Arrows, Seminoles, C-172RG's, Duchesses, and other retracts that are purpose-built as trainers. They are not the same class of airplane, and thus your transition training will take longer and be of lower quality. Michael |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Michael" wrote in message
om... BTW - be careful in regards to the checkout. The Bo is EXTREMELY easy to land - easier than anything I have ever flown, including the C-172. Have you got any time on the Duchess? I guess the Bo (which I've never flown) must be similar in its landing characteristics, despite the difference in empennage. I just spent a week upgrading my IR from SE to ME, which necessitated flying the Duchess. Having spent most of my hours landing the Mooney 201 and the Twin Com, it's a very different experience, which flatters even my handling skills. You don't so much "land" it as drive it into the general vicinity of the runway in a vaguely sensible attitude and let the awesome trailing-link gear do the rest. ;-) If it didn't have carbs, it would be a nice aircraft. Julian Scarfe |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
(B. Salmon ) wrote:
Peter, your thinking on the ABS is on target they can point you in the right direction for a dual yoke. I also recommend you attend a BPPP (Baron/Bonanza Pilot Proficiency Program) after you have 25 hours or so in the aircraft. The BPPP can teach you how to get the most out of the plane and show you things most instructors don't teach. They can also save your life with the techniques they teach. I will do that. Thank's for the advice. snip I would also caution you not to be complacent on the transition, this is not as simple an aircraft to move up to as you may have been led to believe. You have my word that I am taking this very seriously. -- Peter ----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups ---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Peter R." wrote in message ... (B. Salmon ) wrote: Peter, your thinking on the ABS is on target they can point you in the right direction for a dual yoke. I also recommend you attend a BPPP (Baron/Bonanza Pilot Proficiency Program) after you have 25 hours or so in the aircraft. The BPPP can teach you how to get the most out of the plane and show you things most instructors don't teach. They can also save your life with the techniques they teach. I will do that. Thank's for the advice. Are you referring to a V-35 or an F33A? I've trying to nail down a deal on an F33A, so let us know how yours goes. Tom -- "The road to hell is paved with good intentions". |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Michael" wrote in message om... Peter R. wrote Good point, Michael. I am going to be even more conservative than that. Despite 550 hours in a C172, I've lowered my expectation to at least 25 hours to check out in the Bo, most due to IMC/night IMC challenges in an aircraft that can over-speed in an unusual attitude in seconds. Actually, any fast and efficient airplane can overspeed in an unusual attitude in seconds. The Bo is no more prone to it than other airplanes that offer similarly efficient cruise. There's no magic to it - if you want to go fast and not burn a ton of gas, you have to make the plane slippery. Slippery planes accelerate quickly when the nose comes down. The difference between the Bo and other airplanes in its class is the landing qualities. The plane is so easy to land that it will lull you into a false sense of security if you let it. It's no more difficult in night/IMC than other planes in its class. V model or F33? I gots to know! I've about this " " close to concluding a deal on an F33A...then I'm going to dress it out. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tom Sixkiller wrote:
Are you referring to a V-35 or an F33A? I've trying to nail down a deal on an F33A, so let us know how yours goes. '73 V35-B with turbo-normalizer and TKS, among other upgrades. -- Peter ----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups ---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Elite and CH Flight Sim Yoke - USB | tscottme | Instrument Flight Rules | 3 | December 21st 10 11:34 PM |
Beech dual yoke w/rams horns/color preference | Dan Karshin | Aviation Marketplace | 1 | March 28th 04 05:04 PM |
Throw over yokes | Steve P | Piloting | 7 | January 13th 04 06:21 PM |
CH Product Yoke with IP Trainer 6.5 | Sanjay Kumar | Instrument Flight Rules | 2 | October 10th 03 07:47 AM |
Early Bonanza or Apache? | Brinks | Owning | 11 | July 16th 03 06:01 PM |