A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Looking for Transciever suggestions



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 4th 04, 08:16 AM
Lockrdg
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

You do get to use the equipment again, right? g\

Most importantly, no one got hurt.

How bad is the plane?


Yes - when it is fixed (I'm a partner)

True - I had a passenger who is very happy to be on the ground.

Not too bad. The expected bent prop and potential engine/gear work, and of
course, the much thinner belly of the plane. What everyone remarked (fire and
police) was how little debris there was off the plane. I would like to believe
that it was my skill, though more likely luck, but I set the sucker down
straight as an arrow and nestled it down directly on the middle of the
fuselage. The bottom beacon was untouched.

Will be quite a while before it flies again though. Guess I should just
concentrate on building my multi time g.
  #2  
Old July 3rd 04, 11:22 AM
Cub Driver
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


The small Vertex, formerly Yaseu. I have one as my only radio and like
it fine. The rechargable battery is a big plus for me.

Earlier I had a Sporty's and didn't care for it. It ate batteries and
was harder to use than the Yaseu.



On 03 Jul 2004 01:46:42 GMT, (Lockrdg) wrote:

Having experienced and successfully survived my first complete electrical
failure, hence no radios (at night mind you), I am looking for suggestions as
to which hand-held transcievers I might looking into buying.

All suggestions are welcome...

Thanks in advance.


all the best -- Dan Ford
email:
(put Cubdriver in subject line)

The Warbird's Forum
www.warbirdforum.com
The Piper Cub Forum www.pipercubforum.com
Viva Bush! weblog www.vivabush.org
  #3  
Old July 3rd 04, 12:18 PM
Viperdoc
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

The important thing isn't so much the radio as the antenna. The rubber duck
simply won't work as well as hooking the handheld directly into your
comm/nav antenna.

Most avionics shops can install a small jack where you can plug your
handheld that will utilize the plane's antennas. The range and clarity
difference is dramatic. You can then also plug your headset into the
handheld and work directly through the portable.

The comm portion works great, but I haven't tried this with the nav.


  #4  
Old July 3rd 04, 04:55 PM
Thomas Borchert
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Lockrdg,

Yaesu/Vertex and Icom are the main contenders, I would say. Rather than
getting a VOR-NAV function built-in, I'd og for a separate handheld GPS

--
Thomas Borchert (EDDH)

  #5  
Old July 3rd 04, 06:43 PM
Jay Smith
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Thomas Borchert wrote:
Lockrdg,

Yaesu/Vertex and Icom are the main contenders, I would say. Rather than
getting a VOR-NAV function built-in, I'd og for a separate handheld GPS


Except that here in the USA, it is sometimes necessary to talk to FSS on
a comm frequency and listen on the VOR frequency. This is referred to
as working splits. The ICOM has this capability included using the
function button to select it. The receiver is tuned to the VOR frequency
to listen and when you depress the PTT, it switches to the COMM
frequency to transmit. Release the PTT and it switches back to the VOR
frequency.

  #6  
Old July 3rd 04, 07:18 PM
Jim Weir
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

When was the last time you did this for real?

Jim


Jay Smith
shared these priceless pearls of wisdom:


-Except that here in the USA, it is sometimes necessary to talk to FSS on
- a comm frequency and listen on the VOR frequency.



Jim Weir (A&P/IA, CFI, & other good alphabet soup)
VP Eng RST Pres. Cyberchapter EAA Tech. Counselor
http://www.rst-engr.com
  #7  
Old July 3rd 04, 09:37 PM
COUGARNFW
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Yaesu/Vertex and Icom

I agree with Jim re whether one can ever contact a ground station anymore using
the split frequency...nobody at home??

With respect to the handhelds, you have received some good information, the
external antenna being by far the best. When using an external antenna, it
seems the radio was never told that it should shun horizontally oriented
signals and works just fine on both com and nav. The distances it will receive
and send are amazing.

Jim just had a string about the little box or antenna bypass.

Ask again about the nav function on the Yaesu/Vertex. A friend purchased a
unit 3? months ago and all works well, great features, nice lighting, but the
nav has yet to work. The unit has been more in the shop at the main
Yaesu/Vertex plant in LA than in his hands.

A couple nights ago, after he got it back the third? time, we did a comparison
against an Icom 21 and a Narco 830 (no Narco is recommended for anything...I
have the 830) and both of them performed better than the Yaesu/Vertex.

He has had to chase the radio, with no feedback by Yaesu/Vertex and they must
be goaded for each transaction/followup. That was not always true,and one
wonders if it is because of the Vertex change.

External antenna, however it is done

Plug-in for 12 V power so as to not deplete the battery. (What Icom never
tells you...some of their portables WILL NOT work when plugged into 12V, just
the opposite of what one wants in time of need..ask the question and test each
one that way)

The headset adapter which includes provisons for a pust to talk switch or a
switch itself.

Good luck and come back and tell us what you decide. It helps others.

Neal


  #9  
Old July 4th 04, 10:11 PM
john smith
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Jim Weir wrote:
When was the last time you did this for real?


Had to do it to pick up an IFR clearance while on the ground last year.

  #10  
Old July 7th 04, 10:44 PM
Robert M. Gary
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Last time I opened a VFR flight plan.

Jim Weir wrote in message . ..
When was the last time you did this for real?

-Except that here in the USA, it is sometimes necessary to talk to FSS on
- a comm frequency and listen on the VOR frequency.

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Destination Suggestions Matt Young Piloting 9 July 5th 04 03:17 AM
Spousal checkride -- any suggestions? Eric Ross Piloting 41 June 21st 04 06:58 PM
Bend, OR (S07) to OSH route suggestions Jack Allison Piloting 4 April 12th 04 09:19 PM
Portable oxygen system suggestions... hnelson Owning 3 August 11th 03 08:39 AM
Demo Flight Suggestions Ben Jackson Owning 6 July 12th 03 01:16 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:57 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.