![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() If we aren't to fight back, for fear of creating more terrorists, what are we to do? Sometimes "nothing" is the right answer. Sometimes, we must just accept that the price of freedom is risk. Sure, our nation is a colander. But to seal it up as tightly as would be necessary to stop terrorism would be to suffocate it. The war is not with people - it is with ideas. But ideas are what we claim to let free. Jose -- (for Email, make the obvious changes in my address) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You make several good points, Roger -- but I didn't seen any viable
alternatives in your post. If we aren't to fight back, for fear of creating more terrorists, what are we to do? To get an idea of what we're up against, i suggest reading the following link: http://www.nationalreview.com/commen...0407020030.asp They are not after us for what we do, but for what we are, and unless we are willing to put Brittany Spears in a Burka and bow toward Mecca 5 times a day, there isn[t going to be peace short of victory. -- Wm. Donald (Don) Tabor Jr., DDS PP-ASEL Chesapeake, VA - CPK, PVG |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 11 Jul 2004 12:40:13 GMT, Wdtabor wrote:
They are not after us for what we do, but for what we are, and unless we are willing to put Brittany Spears in a Burka If she does not stop singing then this will not help very much. :-) #m -- http://makeashorterlink.com/?Q1FE524C8 |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 11 Jul 2004 12:40:13 GMT, Wdtabor wrote:
They are not after us for what we do, but for what we are, and unless we are willing to put Brittany Spears in a Burka And the problem with this is...what? (*snicker*) |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Wdtabor" wrote in message ... You make several good points, Roger -- but I didn't seen any viable alternatives in your post. If we aren't to fight back, for fear of creating more terrorists, what are we to do? To get an idea of what we're up against, i suggest reading the following link: http://www.nationalreview.com/commen...0407020030.asp The problem is hugely more complicated that that. If you want to read something that is actually helful to this debate, try: http://www.nupi.no/IPS/filestore/Root_Causes_report.pdf This is a report from an international Conference on terrorisim in June 2003 in Oslo, and included American and Israeli particpants, among others. You need to read the whole thing, but the finding on "religion" as a basis of terrorism as quoted from the report: "Suicide terrorism is not caused by religion (or more specifically Islam) as such.... Many suicide terrorists around the world are secular, or belong to other religions than Islam. Suicide terrorists are motivated mainly by political goals – usually to end foreign occupation or domestic domination by a different ethnic group. Their “martyrdom” is, however, frequently legitimised and glorified with reference to religious ideas and values." |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article le.rogers.com,
"Icebound" writes: http://www.nationalreview.com/commen...0407020030.asp The problem is hugely more complicated that that. If you want to read something that is actually helful to this debate, try: http://www.nupi.no/IPS/filestore/Root_Causes_report.pdf This is a report from an international Conference on terrorisim in June 2003 in Oslo, and included American and Israeli particpants, among others. You need to read the whole thing, but the finding on "religion" as a basis of terrorism as quoted from the report: I read it. It is just the usual apologist, 'it has to be someone else's fault' claptrap. It can be reasonably argued that Islam, in and of itself, is not the cause of terrorism, but the religion is uniquely succeptable to being siezed upon by facist ideologues and used as the unifying identity that a fascist expansion requires. Muslim holy literature, particularly Sura 9:29, preaches a superiority, and worse, an entitlement, attached to believers. The Koran itself authorizes conversion by the sword for pagans and idolators and demands tribute from 'people of the book' (Christians and Jews) for living at peace within Muslim spheres of influence. Add to that the lack of a Muslim 'Pope' to settle religious questions, and any fascist ideologue can waive the Koran and call for Jihad against some presumed infidel offense and there is no one to state absolutley that he is wrong. Look around the world and point to a single place where a Muslim theocracy lives at peace with a weaker non-Muslim neighbor. You can't, there isn't one. The UN tracks over 130 trouble spots where recurring political violence is a problem. 6 do not involve Muslims. Are those all cases of discrimination against Muslims? Are the Phillipines subject to terrorism because they somehow interferred in Palestine? The West in general, and the US in particular, tends to introspection, and looks inward for the source of all wrong. We always ask "What did we do wrong to deserve their hatred?" Muslims never ask that question. In any dispute, they are right BECAUSE they have submitted to the will of Allah and we are wrong because we have not. Understand that one thing and you can understand our enemy. -- Wm. Donald (Don) Tabor Jr., DDS PP-ASEL Chesapeake, VA - CPK, PVG |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Very good points all. To answer Jay's question, we hit them with a resolve never before seen in war. Islam needs to be beaten back into the cave it slithered out of and kept there for the next 10,000 years. Islam is the enemy and we are in a war for civilization. Make no mistake about that. This war is a test of will. Theirs against ours. So far we're running it like a 5th Avenue PR campaign and they're running it like it should be run. We're applying Western values to this fight and that is the biggest mistake of all. We try to talk things out, we try to reason. Those tactics will not work this time. We have to fight them on their own terms. No quarter. No mercy. They all die. Anything less than total commitment is capitulation. Flame away boys and girls. It's the only way and in your heart of hearts you know it. BillC "Roger Long" wrote in message ... Why is this on topic for this forum? Face it, even if the next terrorist action is carried out with trained hamsters marching down 42 ND street with little explosive backpacks, shutting down general aviation will be a centerpiece of the response. and so on... You make several good points, Roger -- but I didn't seen any viable alternatives in your post. If we aren't to fight back, for fear of creating more terrorists, what are we to do? -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It's a war for civilization all right but the enemy is no more Islam than
Timothy McVeigh was a Christian patriot. This situation is only going to be resolved when the societies that produce the terrorists change so that there are no longer large numbers if the disaffected that see terror and fundamentalism as the only path. These are Islamic societies and nothing short of sterilizing the ground with nuclear bombs is going to change that. Terrorism is as abhorrent to true Islam as it is to Christianity. Unless we are prepared to kill millions to eliminate thousands of terrorists we will not solve this problem until the Islamic societies become our allies in the struggle. Your kind of thinking, and just about everything our government is doing, works directly against this. The distortions of culture, society, and government in the mideast that lead to this are largely of our (the West's) doing. The very borders of the nations were established by Britain and other powers of the time without regard to ethnic borders that would create stable nations. We threw the economies and cultures completely out of whack with oil money and tolerated and supported brutal dictatorships that would keep the oil flowing. Bin Laden and Sadam themselves are largely creations of the CIA supported struggle against Russia in Afghanistan and our meddling in the Iran / Iraq war. We need to accept that our decades of mistakes and meddling have created a situation in which terrorism is as inevitable as hurricanes. We don't go into a tizzy of breast beating, changing of society, and restriction of civil liberties when a hurricane does millions of dollars in damage and kills many. Hell, we even give the rich folks on the barrier beaches money to rebuild (until recently). Hurricanes and earthquakes are not manhood and virility challenges to our leaders so everyone shrugs and life goes on. Israel has proved that terrorism can not be eliminated by force even within a small geographic area where some of the toughest people in the world have enormous control and decades of understanding the situation on the ground and the culture they are dealing with. What chance do we have over a huge area at the end of a long logistical trail when the Pentagon can't even find enough translators? This is now an intractable and long term problem that is going to have to be managed. The solution will take decades and patience. Thinking of terrorism as something that has to be eliminated before the next election or we'll need a new president will make true solutions impossible to pursue or implement. Nothing constructive will happen until Islamic societies start to function properly in the modern world, leadership in them is supported by the population at large, and they see themselves as allies with us in the struggle against terror. Everything being done now is probably being cheered by Bin Laden. It's much like trying to glide to a landing spot after an engine out. Pull back on the yoke and you will land shorter or even stall and crash. Right now, all the passengers are screaming, "Pull up, pull up!" and big burly fellows are struggling to the front to try and grab the yoke to pull it back further. Kerry isn't going to do any better unless he can become the kind of leader who can calm the passengers and regain control. I don't have a lot of confidence that he can do that but I'd rather not have a pilot in this situation who clearly thinks that how hard he pulls back on the yoke is the test of his leadership. -- Roger Long |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Roger Long" wrote in message ... It's a war for civilization all right but the enemy is no more Islam than Timothy McVeigh was a Christian patriot. This situation is only going to be resolved when the societies that produce the terrorists change so that there are no longer large numbers if the disaffected that see terror and fundamentalism as the only path. These are Islamic societies and nothing short of sterilizing the ground with nuclear bombs is going to change that. Terrorism is as abhorrent to true Islam as it is to Christianity. There is considerable evidence to the contrary. It appears that Islam not only sponsors terrorism, it is a way of life. More than 90% of the world's wars are being fought in Islamic countries. That says a lot about Islam. All the so-called 'moderate' Islamic sects and countries provide enormous amounts of money as well as shelter and support to terrorists. Quite honestly, I think that nuclear sterilization is an option that should be explored. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 9 Jul 2004 12:01:05 -0700, C J Campbell wrote:
There is considerable evidence to the contrary. It appears that Islam not only sponsors terrorism, it is a way of life. More than 90% of the world's wars are being fought in Islamic countries. That says a lot about Islam. All the so-called 'moderate' Islamic sects and countries provide enormous amounts of money as well as shelter and support to terrorists. Quite honestly, I think that nuclear sterilization is an option that should be explored. and maybe this will be said to the kids in the middle east: ----------start There is considerable evidence to the contrary. It appears that the American idea not only sponsors Christianity, it is a way of life. More than 90% of the world's wars in the last 200 years are being fought direct or indirect with the support of America. That says a lot about America. All the so-called 'moderate' western countries and American allies provide enormous amounts of money as well as shelter and support the American idea. Quite honestly, I think that nuclear sterilization is an option that should be explored. ----------end you get the point? no? I'm not surprised. #m -- Michael Moo Fahrenheit 9/11: http://www.fahrenheit911.com/ |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Operation Cyanide and the USS Liberty (was: Navy crew remembers 1967 Israeli attack) | Issac Goldberg | Naval Aviation | 20 | July 12th 04 01:35 AM |
F15E's trounced by Eurofighters | John Cook | Military Aviation | 193 | April 11th 04 03:33 AM |
THOMAS MOORER, EX-JOINT CHIEFS CHAIR DIES | Ewe n0 who | Naval Aviation | 4 | February 21st 04 09:01 PM |
THOMAS MOORER, EX-JOINT CHIEFS CHAIR DIES | Ewe n0 who | Military Aviation | 2 | February 12th 04 12:52 AM |