unfolded/creaseless charts

"Kyler Laird" wrote in message
...
http://aviationtoolbox.org/raw_data/...onals/current/

Wow...it only took three tries to get *actual* useful information out of
you. A Usenet record!

My point, since you still don't seem to get it, is that replies like "get a
local shop to print a fresh one for you", and posting a link to Kinko's web
site are not useful at all to anyone who actually is requesting the
information being requested.

If the question had been "I've got a TIFF file of a sectional, and I want it
printed on a big piece of paper", then what you wrote would have been
perfectly appropriate. But that's not the question that was asked.

If you really are serious about helping, try being a little more helpful
next time.

Pete

On Fri, 17 Sep 2004 15:27:13 -0700, "Peter Duniho"
wrote:

http://groups.google.com/groups?q=g:...wls.lairds.org

http://groups.google.com/groups?num=... &btnG=Search

Any questions now?

My guess is Mr. Laird has spent more time being "serious about
helping" than you've spent "whining like a bitch" on Usenet.

"My point, since you still don't seem to get it, is that" your
personal signal-to-noise ratio isn't anything to brag about.

TC


"Kyler Laird" wrote in message
...
http://aviationtoolbox.org/raw_data/...onals/current/

Wow...it only took three tries to get *actual* useful information out of
you. A Usenet record!

My point, since you still don't seem to get it, is that replies like "get a
local shop to print a fresh one for you", and posting a link to Kinko's web
site are not useful at all to anyone who actually is requesting the
information being requested.

If the question had been "I've got a TIFF file of a sectional, and I want it
printed on a big piece of paper", then what you wrote would have been
perfectly appropriate. But that's not the question that was asked.

If you really are serious about helping, try being a little more helpful
next time.

Pete

wrote in message
...
My guess is Mr. Laird has spent more time being "serious about
helping" than you've spent "whining like a bitch" on Usenet.

Still sore, Mr. I Post Behind A Fake Name?

Give it a rest. You'll be able to sit down, eventually.

On Fri, 17 Sep 2004 21:11:04 GMT, Kyler Laird
wrote:

It's difficult for me to believe that you've never seen the FAA sectional
images nor were you able to find them, but...
http://aviationtoolbox.org/raw_data/...onals/current/


Thanks for the link! I never knew you could get these files off the
web!

z

On Fri, 17 Sep 2004 17:17:36 -0700, "Peter Duniho"
wrote:

wrote in message
.. .
My guess is Mr. Laird has spent more time being "serious about
helping" than you've spent "whining like a bitch" on Usenet.

Still sore, Mr. I Post Behind A Fake Name?

Give it a rest. You'll be able to sit down, eventually.


Snappy comeback.

Totally avoids the fact that you screwed the pooch by slamming Mr.
Laird, plus a precious wittle baby flame for me.

BTW don't worry about my posterior, I've developed hard calluses from
years of dealing with dicks just like you.

TC

In article ,
wrote:

BTW don't worry about my posterior, I've developed hard calluses from
years of dealing with dicks just like you.

Heh, ehm, uh, do you want to rephrase that??

--
Ben Jackson

http://www.ben.com/

Kyler Laird wrote:

http://aviationtoolbox.org/raw_data/...onals/current/

Has anyone ever tried to trim the borders and cut and past all of these
together into one gigantic map? I have access to a 44" wide inkjet
printer, I wonder how it would look with the lower 48 states printed out
44" tall by however long that would be. If someone does a good job
putting all the maps together I might be persuaded to make that ONE
person ONE printout too.

--
Chris W

Bring Back the HP 15C
http://hp15c.org

Not getting the gifts you want? The Wish Zone can help.
http://thewishzone.com

"Chris W" wrote in message
news:9GQ2d.57765$mu.20977@okepread07...
Kyler Laird wrote:

http://aviationtoolbox.org/raw_data/...onals/current/

Has anyone ever tried to trim the borders and cut and past all of these
together into one gigantic map? I have access to a 44" wide inkjet
printer, I wonder how it would look with the lower 48 states printed out
44" tall by however long that would be. If someone does a good job
putting all the maps together I might be persuaded to make that ONE
person ONE printout too.

A better proposition would be to get a high-density digital version and
print it at the "size to page" setting.

On Sat, 18 Sep 2004 03:56:59 -0700, "Tom S." wrote:


"Chris W" wrote in message
news:9GQ2d.57765$mu.20977@okepread07...
Kyler Laird wrote:

http://aviationtoolbox.org/raw_data/...onals/current/

Has anyone ever tried to trim the borders and cut and past all of these
together into one gigantic map? I have access to a 44" wide inkjet
printer, I wonder how it would look with the lower 48 states printed out
44" tall by however long that would be. If someone does a good job
putting all the maps together I might be persuaded to make that ONE
person ONE printout too.

A better proposition would be to get a high-density digital version and
print it at the "size to page" setting.


They won't fit together at the borders perfectly, as each is an
independent Lambert conformation, which distorts them to provide the
best two-dimensional map.

Jay Somerset wrote, "[Sectionals] won't fit together at the borders
perfectly, as each is an
independent Lambert conformation, which distorts them to provide the best
two-dimensional map"

At Oshkosh a couple years ago, I asked one of the moving map guys how they
handled the edge of map problem. He said they digitally reverse the Lambert
projection to create a virtual ellipsoidal image (or maybe spherical is good
enough -- I'm not certain if he was that specific) then create a Lambert
projection suitable to the new location.

Jon