![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ross, Thanks for your note and your offer to send me a
spreadsheet. Hopefully I'll be able to figure out the math principles behind the formulas. Based on the number of responses, there is hope for what is needed. I'll have a close look at the posts when I get home. My email to you bounced as well. I guess no one uses real email addresses anymore. Try this one, it'll be valid for a couple of days: jwasikusa "@" dublinhills "dot" com. Thanks. Ross Richardson wrote in message ... Send me your correct e-mail address and I will send you the spreadsheet I developed for my C-172F. It even has the graphic and a "*" to show you where you are in the envelop. I do not have access to post is anywhere and I cannot attach to this message. I tried to reply to the address in your post and it bounced back. Joe Wasik wrote: Hello, I put together a quick Excel spreadsheet that calculates total weight and total moment for a Cessna 172. However, to check the CG, I still have to take these calculated values and place them onto the diagram called "Center of Gravity Moment Envelope". Does anyone know if this lookup can be performed via a calculation? Knowing this would be very helpful. Thank you. Ross N7905U 180hp |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Excel uses only an IF statement. I have used it in an unrelated large
scale water flow situation, but found it messy to use. I was thinking that a series of them could be used to end up with a yes (OK) or no answer, but I like your concept better of showing where you are on the actual CG/GW range. In addition you could show the effect of burning off fuel as a line. I don't think any 172s will present a problem in this area, but some others like Bonanzas can. My experience is that it is hard to exceed the CG range of a 172, but easy to exceed the gross weight. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote in message
om... Excel uses only an IF statement. I have used it in an unrelated large scale water flow situation, but found it messy to use. Most likely because you are not sufficiently familiar with Excel. The fact that you think that "Excel uses only an IF statement" supports this likelihood. It has hundreds of worksheet functions, not counting all of the add-ins that provide even more functionality. I don't know what calculations are involved in a "large scale water flow situation", but I doubt it really required exclusive use of nested IF statements. [...] In addition you could show the effect of burning off fuel as a line. I don't think any 172s will present a problem in this area, but some others like Bonanzas can. You could draw a line, but why bother? All you really need are the two end-points. I've never seen a W&B graph that had a convex curve, which would be required to allow the takeoff and landing weights to fall inside the envelope, while still having an intermediate state outside the envelope. Pete |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
172S Weight and Balance Question | David J | Piloting | 9 | March 23rd 04 01:08 AM |
Weight and Balance | JP | Piloting | 2 | January 13th 04 10:54 AM |
Weight & Balance Question | Harry Gordon | Piloting | 28 | December 30th 03 01:51 AM |
RV-7a baggage area | David Smith | Home Built | 32 | December 15th 03 04:08 AM |
Weight and balance question. | Wayne | Piloting | 5 | November 28th 03 06:45 PM |