![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 12 Dec 2016 18:50:25 -0000, wrote:
Again, are you saying the silly press release was written by the design engineers? Here's the performance statement from the engineers: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- http://lilium-aviation.com/about.html Lilium Aviation about the vision What if the way you thought about distances radically changed? Imagine, you could have breakfast in Munich, go shopping in Milano and enjoy dinner in Marseille. Imagine being able to bypass lines, jams, cancellations, and distances easily and fast. Imagine environmental pollution no longer being a concern because all transportation is electric. Imagine being safer than you’ve ever been in a vehicle. Imagine the freedom, the elegance, and the fun. In the future there will be a completely new way of commuting. People will move to rural areas while working in big cities, because long distances can be covered in a fraction of the traditional time. The aggressive rise of rent in city centers will be halted. Federal states will become metropolises. Concrete-covered landscapes will become green again; the costly maintenance of our current infrastructure will become obsolete. Commuters will use VTOL aircrafts to land directly on landing pads extending from their balconies, on rooftops and assigned landing areas. No need to wait for the bus, no need to conform with plane and train schedules. Go wherever you want, whenever you want - take the Lilium Jet! We are building it. about the product Take-off and landing: Vertically Number of passengers: 2 Number of electric fan engines: 36 Max. take-off weight: 600 kg Payload: 200 kg Estimated cruising velocity: 250 - 300 km/h / 160 - 190 mph Estimated range: 300 km / 190 mi Power: 320 kW / 435 hp About the team Founded in February 2015 by four visionary aerospace engineers and product designers from the Technical University of Munich, Lilium is now a thriving start up driven by the passion to revolutionize personal transportation. Financially secure thanks to reputable investors and supported by the European Space Agency (ESA), Lilium has flourished into a team of more than 35 world-class engineers, designers and pioneers. At Lilium, we are active pioneers of tomorrow´s technology. We excel at innovation and strive for perfection. And we want to be the first and the best in electric VTOL aviation. Funding and supporting partners BIC Climate-KIC U-TUM Contact Lilium Lilium GmbH, Friedrichshafener Strasse 1, 82205 Gilching, Germany ================================================== =========================== |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 13 Dec 2016 15:22:51 +1300, george152 wrote:
The bit that I don't get is the jet claim. And helicopters difficult to fly ????? Really.... And the claimed airspeed --- in a helicopter ????? Reminds me of the 'plane in every garage' 30's mantra... And look how successful that wasn't It reminds me of the Moller Skycar M400: http://www.moller.com/ Video: https://youtu.be/FY85eExk7Zo https://youtu.be/gOR_SzLW2Ns Six air-cars: https://youtu.be/WygPLO_-8-8 |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Larry Dighera wrote:
On Mon, 12 Dec 2016 18:50:25 -0000, wrote: Again, are you saying the silly press release was written by the design engineers? Here's the performance statement from the engineers: That is wonderful but misses the point and ignores what I said. It is the language of the press release that is silly. It is full of arm waving, speculation, innuendo, half truths, and flat out lies. snip silly prose now repeated several times - take the Lilium Jet! We are building it. It is NOT a jet. about the product Take-off and landing: Vertically Number of passengers: 2 Number of electric fan engines: 36 Max. take-off weight: 600 kg Payload: 200 kg Estimated cruising velocity: 250 - 300 km/h / 160 - 190 mph Estimated range: 300 km / 190 mi Power: 320 kW / 435 hp Whoopee!! snip more silly prose now repeated several times -- Jim Pennino |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 15 Dec 2016 08:32:00 +0100, Gerhard Strangar wrote:
Larry Dighera wrote: Lilium GmbH, Friedrichshafener Strasse 1, 82205 Gilching, Germany Now it all makes sense, that's right at the end of a (unsually inactive) runway. That runway was used by the Dornier GmbH (now part of the Airbus group), which tested the VTOL cargo plane Do 31. They built prototypes and then cancelled the program when it no longer met the NATO requirements. Looks like a second attempt. Interesting. I recall seeing a small runway next to a full sized runway in one of the videos on their web site. Their latest )Dec 2016) video is he https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DjqnTYKYMwM . Jim will get a kick out of the use of the term 'jet' used in this promotional piece. Apparently they have designed a new electric motor that resembles a turbine, shown in the video. Here's another innovator discussing a VTOL supersonic electric "jet": https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=erjdYiwoYAo |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Larry Dighera wrote:
On Thu, 15 Dec 2016 08:32:00 +0100, Gerhard Strangar wrote: Larry Dighera wrote: Lilium GmbH, Friedrichshafener Strasse 1, 82205 Gilching, Germany Now it all makes sense, that's right at the end of a (unsually inactive) runway. That runway was used by the Dornier GmbH (now part of the Airbus group), which tested the VTOL cargo plane Do 31. They built prototypes and then cancelled the program when it no longer met the NATO requirements. Looks like a second attempt. Interesting. I recall seeing a small runway next to a full sized runway in one of the videos on their web site. Their latest )Dec 2016) video is he https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DjqnTYKYMwM . Jim will get a kick out of the use of the term 'jet' used in this promotional piece. Apparently they have designed a new electric motor that resembles a turbine, shown in the video. Here's another innovator discussing a VTOL supersonic electric "jet": https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=erjdYiwoYAo Who would like to fly in an airplane designed by someone ignorant of basic aviation terminology? -- Jim Pennino |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Larry Dighera wrote:
On Thu, 15 Dec 2016 08:32:00 +0100, Gerhard Strangar wrote: Larry Dighera wrote: Lilium GmbH, Friedrichshafener Strasse 1, 82205 Gilching, Germany Now it all makes sense, that's right at the end of a (unsually inactive) runway. That runway was used by the Dornier GmbH (now part of the Airbus group), which tested the VTOL cargo plane Do 31. They built prototypes and then cancelled the program when it no longer met the NATO requirements. Looks like a second attempt. Interesting. I recall seeing a small runway next to a full sized runway in one of the videos on their web site. Their latest )Dec 2016) video is he https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DjqnTYKYMwM . Jim will get a kick out of the use of the term 'jet' used in this promotional piece. Apparently they have designed a new electric motor that resembles a turbine, shown in the video. There is a cat that hangs out in my back yard that resembles a cow. Does that make it a cow? The video starts off with two claims: they will eliminate cars and infrastructure. As for the first claim, it is just too ridiculous to bother further comment. As for the second claim, a large, clear flat area IS infrastructure and would be new infrastructure. -- Jim Pennino |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 15 Dec 2016 18:39:55 -0000, wrote:
Larry Dighera wrote: On Thu, 15 Dec 2016 08:32:00 +0100, Gerhard Strangar wrote: Larry Dighera wrote: Lilium GmbH, Friedrichshafener Strasse 1, 82205 Gilching, Germany Now it all makes sense, that's right at the end of a (unsually inactive) runway. That runway was used by the Dornier GmbH (now part of the Airbus group), which tested the VTOL cargo plane Do 31. They built prototypes and then cancelled the program when it no longer met the NATO requirements. Looks like a second attempt. Interesting. I recall seeing a small runway next to a full sized runway in one of the videos on their web site. Their latest )Dec 2016) video is he https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DjqnTYKYMwM . Jim will get a kick out of the use of the term 'jet' used in this promotional piece. Apparently they have designed a new electric motor that resembles a turbine, shown in the video. There is a cat that hangs out in my back yard that resembles a cow. Does that make it a cow? What is your definition of a jet? Was the Nazi V1 powered by a jet engine? http://www.dictionary.com/browse/jet?s=t jet noun 1. a stream of a liquid, gas, or small solid particles forcefully shooting forth from a nozzle, orifice, etc. 2. something that issues in such a stream, as water or gas. 3. a spout or nozzle for emitting liquid or gas: a gas jet. ------------- http://www.dictionary.com/browse/jet-engine jet engine noun 1. an engine, as an aircraft engine, that produces forward motion by the rearward exhaust of a jet of fluid or heated air and gases. ------------- There's a clue he http://www.technovelgy.com/ct/Scienc...p?NewsNum=2712 https://web.archive.org/web/20111011...ngoC_2AP01.pdf Of course, there's always the possible issue of language (mis)translation... The video starts off with two claims: they will eliminate cars and infrastructure. As for the first claim, it is just too ridiculous to bother further comment. Granted the elimination of automobiles is a fanciful notion in Los Angeles, but in Europe, perhaps not so much. As for the second claim, a large, clear flat area IS infrastructure and would be new infrastructure. It's difficult to argue against your opinion. However, a flat spot need not have lighting, radio aids to navigation, paving, structures, etc, so it could be very minimal infrastructure compared to an FAA certified airport or heliport. Don't get me wrong. I'm not defending the Lilium marketing puffery, and am indeed skeptical of the performance claims. Given the information below, the most difficult claim for me to swallow, is a 435 HP FAA certified Light Sport Aircraft. Perhaps there is a European class to which the Lilium may reasonably be expected to conform, or such a revolutionary design may warrant creation of an entirely class. After all, regulations shouldn't stifle innovation, but provide safe and orderly rules so it may flourish. At any rate, the Lilium project has generated significant venture capital, but until a full-sized aircraft flies, and empirically substantiates the claimed performance figures, the Lilium just another Molleresque vaporware dream, IMNSHO. But where would technology be without its dreamers who's visionary pursuits have led to radical improvements in the human condition? ================================================== =========================== https://www.eaa.org/en/eaa/aviation-...ort-pilot-rule FAA SPORT PILOT RULE This is a synopsis of the definition of a light sport aircraft category, the requirements to obtain a sport pilot certificate, and requirements to obtain a repairman certificate with a maintenance or inspection rating. View the complete FAA regulation The Light Sport Aircraft Rule: The FAA defines a light sport aircraft as an aircraft, other than a helicopter or powered-lift that, since its original certification, has continued to meet the following: Max. Gross Takeoff Weight: 1,320 lbs (1,430 lbs for seaplanes) Max. Stall Speed: 51 mph / 45 knots CAS Max. Speed in Level Flight (VH): 138 mph / 120 knots CAS Seats: Two (max.) Engines / Motors: One (max. if powered.) Propeller: Fixed-pitch or ground adjustable Cabin: Unpressurized Landing Gear: Fixed (except for seaplanes and gliders) In addition, light sport aircraft: Can be manufactured and sold ready-to-fly under a new Special Light Sport Aircraft certification category. Aircraft must meet industry consensus standards. Aircraft under this certification may be used for sport and recreation, flight training, and aircraft rental. Can be licensed Experimental Light Sport Aircraft (E-LSA) if kit- or plans-built. Aircraft under this certification may be used only for sport and recreation and flight instruction for the owner of the aircraft. Can be licensed Experimental Light Sport Aircraft (E-LSA) if the aircraft has previously been operated as an ultralight but does not meet the FAR Part 103 definition of an ultralight vehicle. These aircraft must have been transitioned to E-LSA category no later than January 31, 2008. Will have a standard FAA registration - N-number. Category and class includes: Airplane (Land/Sea), Gyroplane, Airship, Balloon, Weight-Shift-Control ("Trike", Land/Sea), Glider, and Powered Parachute. U.S. or foreign manufacture of light sport aircraft is authorized. Aircraft with a standard airworthiness certificate that meet above specifications may be flown by sport pilots. However, the aircraft must remain in standard category and cannot be changed to light sport aircraft category. May be operated at night if the aircraft is equipped per FAR 91.205, if such operations are allowed by the aircraft's operating limitations and the pilot holds at least a Private Pilot certificate and a minimum of a third-class medical. ================================================== ============== |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Larry Dighera wrote:
On Thu, 15 Dec 2016 18:39:55 -0000, wrote: Larry Dighera wrote: On Thu, 15 Dec 2016 08:32:00 +0100, Gerhard Strangar wrote: Larry Dighera wrote: Lilium GmbH, Friedrichshafener Strasse 1, 82205 Gilching, Germany Now it all makes sense, that's right at the end of a (unsually inactive) runway. That runway was used by the Dornier GmbH (now part of the Airbus group), which tested the VTOL cargo plane Do 31. They built prototypes and then cancelled the program when it no longer met the NATO requirements. Looks like a second attempt. Interesting. I recall seeing a small runway next to a full sized runway in one of the videos on their web site. Their latest )Dec 2016) video is he https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DjqnTYKYMwM . Jim will get a kick out of the use of the term 'jet' used in this promotional piece. Apparently they have designed a new electric motor that resembles a turbine, shown in the video. There is a cat that hangs out in my back yard that resembles a cow. Does that make it a cow? What is your definition of a jet? An internal combustion airbreathing engine that produces thrust via exhaust gases, like most people. Was the Nazi V1 powered by a jet engine? A ramjet, a subset of jet engines. snip Of course, there's always the possible issue of language (mis)translation... When the speaker is speaking English? The video starts off with two claims: they will eliminate cars and infrastructure. As for the first claim, it is just too ridiculous to bother further comment. Granted the elimination of automobiles is a fanciful notion in Los Angeles, but in Europe, perhaps not so much. More so in Europe. Land is at a premium in most of Europe and this thing takes about 3 times the area of a car to park plus a much wider taxi way to get from the heliport to the parking area. As for the second claim, a large, clear flat area IS infrastructure and would be new infrastructure. It's difficult to argue against your opinion. However, a flat spot need not have lighting, radio aids to navigation, paving, structures, etc, so it could be very minimal infrastructure compared to an FAA certified airport or heliport. First, do you really think the FAA or any other aviation governing agency in the world is going to allow these things to land and take off just anywhere? Look around you as you drive around; how many places would have the land required to provide a heliport, taxi ways, and parking areas for these things even it were just dirt? Don't get me wrong. I'm not defending the Lilium marketing puffery, and am indeed skeptical of the performance claims. Given the information below, the most difficult claim for me to swallow, is a 435 HP FAA certified Light Sport Aircraft. Perhaps there is a European class to which the Lilium may reasonably be expected to conform, or such a revolutionary design may warrant creation of an entirely class. After all, regulations shouldn't stifle innovation, but provide safe and orderly rules so it may flourish. There is already a class of aircraft that covers the Lilium; it is the same class as the Osprey. You are overlooking the fact that it is a retractable and supposedly goes 190 mph and both take it out of the Light Sport class. At any rate, the Lilium project has generated significant venture capital, but until a full-sized aircraft flies, and empirically substantiates the claimed performance figures, the Lilium just another Molleresque vaporware dream, IMNSHO. But where would technology be without its dreamers who's visionary pursuits have led to radical improvements in the human condition? I would feel better that the thing had a snowball's chance in Hell of success if the press releases weren't full of outright falsehoods, arm waving, and wild ass speculation. snip FAA SPORT PILOT RULE snip Max. Speed in Level Flight (VH): 138 mph / 120 knots CAS Fails here. Engines / Motors: One (max. if powered.) Fails here. snip Landing Gear: Fixed (except for seaplanes and gliders) Fails here. snip remainder of irrelevant stuff -- Jim Pennino |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
PowerFlarm: 2.7 Vertical Range | [email protected] | Soaring | 8 | April 9th 13 11:27 PM |
Vertical and Short Takeoff / Landing Fighters | Aviation | Naval Aviation | 7 | January 5th 04 08:49 PM |
Vertical and Short Takeoff / Landing Fighters | Aviation | Military Aviation | 6 | January 5th 04 01:18 PM |
Long-range Spitfires and daylight Bomber Command raids (was: #1 Jet of World War II) | ArtKramr | Military Aviation | 2 | August 27th 03 11:06 AM |
Long-range Spitfires and daylight Bomber Command raids (was: #1 Jet of World War II) | The Revolution Will Not Be Televised | Military Aviation | 20 | August 27th 03 09:14 AM |